Literature DB >> 17029673

Sagittal curvature of total knee replacements predicts in vivo kinematics.

Oliver Kessler1, Lutz Dürselen, Scott Banks, Henrich Mannel, Frédéric Marin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is known that in vivo kinematics after total knee replacement is influenced by the design of the implant. The goal of this study was to show that the sagittal curvature of two different knee prostheses differing in geometric design predicts their in vivo motion behavior.
METHODS: Three-dimensional tibio-femoral displacements of two prosthesis designs (single radius vs. dual radius) were measured during knee extension under weight bearing conditions by in vivo video fluoroscopy. Finite helical axes were computed to represent the tibio-femoral motions. Angular deviation alpha and the spatial localization deviation delta were used to characterize the motions. Angular deviation is the angle between each incremental finite helical axis and the medio-lateral axis of the femoral component of the prosthesis. The spatial localization deviation is the distance between each finite helical axis and the center of the femoral component of the prosthesis. Statistical comparisons were performed using the median and the interquartile range of the angular deviation and the spatial localization deviation.
FINDINGS: The single-radius design showed finite helical axes concentrated at a single axis near to the medio-lateral axis of the femoral component. The angular and spatial localization deviation of the dual radius design were larger compared to the single radius design, exhibiting finite helical axes varying between two axes.
INTERPRETATION: Video fluoroscopy in combination with finite helical axis analysis proved to be suitable methods to evaluate the in vivo kinematical behavior of total knee arthroplasty, which can be useful for implant designers. Knowledge of in vivo kinematics can also provide surgeons with more background information about the total knee arthroplasty models they implant.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17029673     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  21 in total

1.  Knee functional flexion axis in osteoarthritic patients: comparison in vivo with transepicondylar axis using a navigation system.

Authors:  F Colle; S Bignozzi; N Lopomo; S Zaffagnini; L Sun; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony M J Bull; Oliver Kessler; Mahbub Alam; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The effect of geometric variations in posterior-stabilized knee designs on motion characteristics measured in a knee loading machine.

Authors:  Peter S Walker; Michael T Lowry; Anoop Kumar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Analysis of knee functional flexion axis in navigated TKA: identification and repeatability before and after implant positioning.

Authors:  Francesca Colle; Nicola Lopomo; Danilo Bruni; Andrea Visani; Francesco Iacono; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Change in collateral ligament length and tibiofemoral movement following joint line variation in TKA.

Authors:  Kun-Jhih Lin; Hung-Wen Wei; Chang-Hung Huang; Yu-Liang Liu; Wen-Chuan Chen; Colin Joseph McClean; Cheng-Kung Cheng
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Strong correlation between the morphology of the proximal femur and the geometry of the distal femoral trochlea.

Authors:  Samantha J Wright; Tim A E J Boymans; Bernd Grimm; Anthony W Miles; Oliver Kessler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No differences in functional results and quality of life after single-radius or multiradius TKA.

Authors:  Pedro Hinarejos; Lluis Puig-Verdie; Joan Leal; Xavier Pelfort; Raul Torres-Claramunt; Juan Sánchez-Soler; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Design and kinematics in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vitantonio Digennaro; Francesco Zambianchi; Andrea Marcovigi; Raffaele Mugnai; Francesco Fiacchi; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Three-dimensional motion analysis of the human knee joint: comparison between intra- and post-operative measurements.

Authors:  C Belvedere; S Tamarri; D P Notarangelo; A Ensini; A Feliciangeli; A Leardini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Can TKA design affect the clinical outcome? Comparison between two guided-motion systems.

Authors:  Raffaele Mugnai; Vitantonio Digennaro; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Fabio Catani
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.