| Literature DB >> 29299233 |
Corinna E Dreher1, Ariel Rodríguez1, Molly E Cummings2, Heike Pröhl1.
Abstract
Sexual signals are important for intraspecific communication and mate selection, but their evolution may be driven by both natural and sexual selection, and stochastic processes. Strawberry poison frogs (Oophaga pumilio) show strong color divergence among populations, but coloration also varies among individuals of the same population. The importance of coloration for female mate choice has been studied intensely, and sexual selection seems to affect color divergence in strawberry poison frogs. However, the effect of coloration on mating success under field conditions has received very little attention. Furthermore, few studies examined how phenotypic variation among individuals of the same color morph affects mate selection under natural conditions. We measured the spectral reflectance of courting and noncourting individuals and their background substrates in three geographically separated populations. In one population (Sarapiquí, Costa Rica), we found that naturally occurring courting pairs of males and females had significantly brighter dorsal coloration than individual males and females not engaged in courtship interactions. Our field observations suggest that, in the wild, females prefer brighter males while the reason for the higher courtship activity of brighter females remains unclear. Overall our results imply that brightness differences among individuals of the same color morph may actually affect reproductive success in some populations of strawberry poison frogs.Entities:
Keywords: brightness contrast; color divergence; dendrobatid frogs; mate choice; sexual selection; visual modeling
Year: 2017 PMID: 29299233 PMCID: PMC5743646 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3531
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Study sites and number of frogs (N) for behavioral observations and spectral measurements
| Study site | Geographical coordinates | Habitat | Courted/single males ( | Courted/single females ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarapiquí | 10°28.227′N; 84°0.553′W; 44 m.a.s.l. | Mix of young secondary forest with old cacao plantation | 9/10 | 10/10 |
| Hitoy Cerere | 9°37.819′N; 83°0.879′W; 270 m.a.s.l. | Mix of young secondary forest with old banana plantation, many palms | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Isla Colón | 9°23.170′N; 82°15.941′W; 35 m.a.s.l. | Old secondary forest, closed canopy, many | 13/13 | 13/13 |
Figure 1Mean reflectance spectra (in % reflection relative to white standard) including standard deviation of mated (red line) and unmated (blue line) individuals of Oophaga pumilio from three study populations. Male and female, as well as ventral and dorsal reflectances are shown in separate graphs. Mean reflectance curves average spectra of nine to 13 individuals (Sarapiquí males mated (dorsal and ventral): n = 9; for all Isla Colón spectra: n = 13, for all other spectra: n = 10). Reflectances over 100% emerge due to the brilliant surface of the frogs’ skin, while the used white standard has a dull surface. In order to verify accuracy of reflectance curves, all spectra were visually controlled for oversaturation
Figure 2Variation in spectral variables of 128 individuals of Oophaga pumilio derived from PCA of dorsal and ventral spectral measurements. Plots on the left show the individual scores of the first two components extracted from five dorsal (a) and five ventral (b) spectral variables with symbols and colors identifying the corresponding locality and observed mating condition; the percent of explained variance and most contributing variables (Pearson's r > .7) are indicated on the axes. Panels c and d illustrate the means (symbols) and 95% confidence intervals (whiskers) of dorsal (c) and ventral (d) PCs grouped by locality and mating condition. p‐values of pairwise Tukey tests are indicated next to horizontal lines (locality comparisons) or on top of locality symbols (mating condition comparisons). Only significant effects in univariate analyses were tested with post hoc comparisons, for graphic simplicity only significant results are shown (see Tables S1, S2, S3 for detailed results)