Literature DB >> 23594556

Warning signal brightness variation: sexual selection may work under the radar of natural selection in populations of a polytypic poison frog.

Laura R Crothers1, Molly E Cummings.   

Abstract

Though theory predicts consistency of warning signals in aposematic species to facilitate predator learning, variation in these signals often occurs in nature. The strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio is an exceptionally polytypic (populations are phenotypically distinct) aposematic frog exhibiting variation in warning color and brightness. In the Solarte population, males and females both respond differentially to male brightness variation. Here, we demonstrate through spectrophotometry and visual modeling that aposematic brightness variation within this population is likely visible to two putative predators (crabs, snakes) and conspecifics but not to the presumed major predator (birds). This study thus suggests that signal brightness within D. pumilio populations can be shaped by sexual selection, with limited opportunity for natural selection to influence this trait due to predator sensory constraints. Because signal brightness changes can ultimately lead to changes in hue, our findings at the within-population level can provide insights into understanding this polytypism at across-population scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23594556     DOI: 10.1086/670010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  9 in total

1.  An Analysis of Predator Selection to Affect Aposematic Coloration in a Poison Frog Species.

Authors:  Corinna E Dreher; Molly E Cummings; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Shaping communicative colour signals over evolutionary time.

Authors:  Alison G Ossip-Drahos; José R Oyola Morales; Cuauhcihuatl Vital-García; J Jaime Zúñiga-Vega; Diana K Hews; Emília P Martins
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.963

3.  Mating status correlates with dorsal brightness in some but not all poison frog populations.

Authors:  Corinna E Dreher; Ariel Rodríguez; Molly E Cummings; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Radiation of the polymorphic Little Devil poison frog (Oophaga sylvatica) in Ecuador.

Authors:  Alexandre B Roland; Juan C Santos; Bella C Carriker; Stephanie N Caty; Elicio E Tapia; Luis A Coloma; Lauren A O'Connell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Experimental evidence suggests that specular reflectance and glossy appearance help amplify warning signals.

Authors:  Samuel J Waldron; John A Endler; Janne K Valkonen; Atsushi Honma; Susanne Dobler; Johanna Mappes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Links between prey assemblages and poison frog toxins: A landscape ecology approach to assess how biotic interactions affect species phenotypes.

Authors:  Ivan Prates; Andrea Paz; Jason L Brown; Ana C Carnaval
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Only distance matters - non-choosy females in a poison frog population.

Authors:  Ivonne Meuche; Oscar Brusa; K Eduard Linsenmair; Alexander Keller; Heike Pröhl
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  The evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation: Body morphology and coloration differentiation among brook trout populations of varying size.

Authors:  Carol Zastavniouk; Laura K Weir; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The pervasive effects of lighting environments on sensory drive in bluefin killifish: an investigation into male/male competition, female choice, and predation.

Authors:  Lisa D Mitchem; Shannon Stanis; Nicholas M Sutton; Zachary Turner; Rebecca C Fuller
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.624

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.