Literature DB >> 29297078

Effect of Hydrolyzed Infant Formula vs Conventional Formula on Risk of Type 1 Diabetes: The TRIGR Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mikael Knip1,2, Hans K Åkerblom1, Eva Al Taji3, Dorothy Becker4, Jan Bruining5, Luis Castano6, Thomas Danne7, Carine de Beaufort8, Hans-Michael Dosch9, John Dupre10, William D Fraser11, Neville Howard12, Jorma Ilonen13, Daniel Konrad14, Olga Kordonouri7, Jeffrey P Krischer15, Margaret L Lawson16, Johnny Ludvigsson17, Laszlo Madacsy18, Jeffrey L Mahon10, Anne Ormisson19, Jerry P Palmer20, Paolo Pozzilli21, Erkki Savilahti1, Manuel Serrano-Rios22, Marco Songini23, Shayne Taback24, Outi Vaarala1,25, Neil H White26, Suvi M Virtanen27, Renata Wasikowa28.   

Abstract

Importance: Early exposure to complex dietary proteins may increase the risk of type 1 diabetes in children with genetic disease susceptibility. There are no intact proteins in extensively hydrolyzed formulas. Objective: To test the hypothesis that weaning to an extensively hydrolyzed formula decreases the cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes in young children. Design, Setting, and Participants: An international double-blind randomized clinical trial of 2159 infants with human leukocyte antigen-conferred disease susceptibility and a first-degree relative with type 1 diabetes recruited from May 2002 to January 2007 in 78 study centers in 15 countries; 1081 were randomized to be weaned to the extensively hydrolyzed casein formula and 1078 to a conventional formula. The follow-up of the participants ended on February 28, 2017. Interventions: The participants received either a casein hydrolysate or a conventional adapted cow's milk formula supplemented with 20% of the casein hydrolysate. The minimum duration of study formula exposure was 60 days by 6 to 8 months of age. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was type 1 diabetes diagnosed according to World Health Organization criteria. Secondary outcomes included age at diabetes diagnosis and safety (adverse events).
Results: Among 2159 newborn infants (1021 female [47.3%]) who were randomized, 1744 (80.8%) completed the trial. The participants were observed for a median of 11.5 years (quartile [Q] 1-Q3, 10.2-12.8). The absolute risk of type 1 diabetes was 8.4% among those randomized to the casein hydrolysate (n = 91) vs 7.6% among those randomized to the conventional formula (n = 82) (difference, 0.8% [95% CI, -1.6% to 3.2%]). The hazard ratio for type 1 diabetes adjusted for human leukocyte antigen risk group, duration of breastfeeding, duration of study formula consumption, sex, and region while treating study center as a random effect was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8 to 1.5; P = .46). The median age at diagnosis of type 1 diabetes was similar in the 2 groups (6.0 years [Q1-Q3, 3.1-8.9] vs 5.8 years [Q1-Q3, 2.6-9.1]; difference, 0.2 years [95% CI, -0.9 to 1.2]). Upper respiratory infections were the most common adverse event reported (frequency, 0.48 events/year in the hydrolysate group and 0.50 events/year in the control group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among infants at risk for type 1 diabetes, weaning to a hydrolyzed formula compared with a conventional formula did not reduce the cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes after median follow-up for 11.5 years. These findings do not support a need to revise the dietary recommendations for infants at risk for type 1 diabetes. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00179777.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29297078      PMCID: PMC5833549          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.19826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

Review 1.  Can we predict type 1 diabetes in the general population?

Authors:  Mikael Knip
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes in childhood - estimation of HLA class II associated disease risk and class II effect in various phases of islet autoimmunity.

Authors:  J Ilonen; M Kiviniemi; J Lempainen; O Simell; J Toppari; R Veijola; M Knip
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.866

3.  Infant feeding in Finnish children less than 7 yr of age with newly diagnosed IDDM. Childhood Diabetes in Finland Study Group.

Authors:  S M Virtanen; L Räsänen; A Aro; J Lindström; H Sippola; R Lounamaa; L Toivanen; J Tuomilehto; H K Akerblom
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Infant feeding and the risk of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Mikael Knip; Suvi M Virtanen; Hans K Akerblom
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Age at introduction of new foods and advanced beta cell autoimmunity in young children with HLA-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S M Virtanen; M G Kenward; M Erkkola; S Kautiainen; C Kronberg-Kippilä; T Hakulinen; S Ahonen; L Uusitalo; S Niinistö; R Veijola; O Simell; J Ilonen; M Knip
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Autoantibody appearance and risk for development of childhood diabetes in offspring of parents with type 1 diabetes: the 2-year analysis of the German BABYDIAB Study.

Authors:  A G Ziegler; M Hummel; M Schenker; E Bonifacio
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 9.461

7.  Timing of initial cereal exposure in infancy and risk of islet autoimmunity.

Authors:  Jill M Norris; Katherine Barriga; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Michelle Hoffman; George S Eisenbarth; Henry A Erlich; Marian Rewers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The first signs of beta-cell autoimmunity appear in infancy in genetically susceptible children from the general population: the Finnish Type 1 Diabetes Prediction and Prevention Study.

Authors:  T Kimpimäki; A Kupila; A M Hämäläinen; M Kukko; P Kulmala; K Savola; T Simell; P Keskinen; J Ilonen; O Simell; M Knip
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.958

9.  Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation.

Authors:  K G Alberti; P Z Zimmet
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Seroconversion to multiple islet autoantibodies and risk of progression to diabetes in children.

Authors:  Anette G Ziegler; Marian Rewers; Olli Simell; Tuula Simell; Johanna Lempainen; Andrea Steck; Christiane Winkler; Jorma Ilonen; Riitta Veijola; Mikael Knip; Ezio Bonifacio; George S Eisenbarth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Immune Mechanisms and Pathways Targeted in Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Laura M Jacobsen; Brittney N Newby; Daniel J Perry; Amanda L Posgai; Michael J Haller; Todd M Brusko
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  The Long-Term Effects of Dietary Nutrient Intakes during the First 2 Years of Life in Healthy Infants from Developed Countries: An Umbrella Review.

Authors:  Carlo Agostoni; Anat Guz-Mark; Luba Marderfeld; Gregorio P Milani; Marco Silano; Raanan Shamir
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 3.  Type 1 diabetes-early life origins and changing epidemiology.

Authors:  Jill M Norris; Randi K Johnson; Lars C Stene
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 32.069

Review 4.  Early-life factors contributing to type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Maria E Craig; Ki Wook Kim; Sonia R Isaacs; Megan A Penno; Emma E Hamilton-Williams; Jennifer J Couper; William D Rawlinson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  In vitro Digestion Characteristics of Hydrolyzed Infant Formula and Its Effects on the Growth and Development in Mice.

Authors:  Lifang Feng; Wei Ye; Kuo Zhang; Daofeng Qu; Weilin Liu; Min Wu; Jianzhong Han
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-24

Review 6.  New Frontiers in the Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Jeremy T Warshauer; Jeffrey A Bluestone; Mark S Anderson
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 27.287

7.  Yield of a Public Health Screening of Children for Islet Autoantibodies in Bavaria, Germany.

Authors:  Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Kerstin Kick; Ezio Bonifacio; Florian Haupt; Markus Hippich; Desiree Dunstheimer; Martin Lang; Otto Laub; Katharina Warncke; Karin Lange; Robin Assfalg; Manja Jolink; Christiane Winkler; Peter Achenbach
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Increasing plasma glucose before the development of type 1 diabetes-the TRIGR study.

Authors:  Johnny Ludvigsson; David Cuthbertson; Dorothy J Becker; Olga Kordonouri; Bärbel Aschemeier; Daniele Pacaud; Cheril Clarson; Jeffrey P Krischer; Mikael Knip
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 4.866

9.  Graves disease in infancy: a patient presentation and literature review.

Authors:  Kara Alex-Ann Beliard; Srinidhi Shyamkumar; Preneet Cheema Brar; Robert Rapaport
Journal:  Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep       Date:  2021-06-01

10.  Infant formulas containing hydrolysed protein for prevention of allergic disease.

Authors:  David A Osborn; John Kh Sinn; Lisa J Jones
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.