OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of a second course of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to control brain metastases as well as to document the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation with SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2001 and 2010, 37 patients with 43 retreated lesions were treated with ≥2courses of SRS to the same brain metastasis. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as follow-up data were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed to assess tumor response to treatment. Development of RN, as confirmed by pathology or imaging, was recorded. Local control, overall survival, and predictors of RN were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common histology was melanoma (n=20, 47%) followed by lung (n=9, 21%), and breast (n=8, 19%) cancer. RN was identified in 7/43 (16%) lesions. Using a competing risk model for analysis, with death as the competing risk, the incidence of RN was 11.6% and 16.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and the incidence of local failure was 16.7% and 19.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was not a statistically significant association between radiation dose, mean tumor size, number of months between SRS courses, use of WBRT, or use of surgery and the development of RN. Median survival after the second course of SRS was 8.3 months, and median survival for those with and without RN was 14.1 and 7.7 months, respectively (p=0.23). CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with SRS can lead to tumor response in the majority of patients with a low incidence of RN.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of a second course of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to control brain metastases as well as to document the incidence of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation with SRS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2001 and 2010, 37 patients with 43 retreated lesions were treated with ≥2courses of SRS to the same brain metastasis. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics as well as follow-up data were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging was reviewed to assess tumor response to treatment. Development of RN, as confirmed by pathology or imaging, was recorded. Local control, overall survival, and predictors of RN were analyzed. RESULTS: The most common histology was melanoma (n=20, 47%) followed by lung (n=9, 21%), and breast (n=8, 19%) cancer. RN was identified in 7/43 (16%) lesions. Using a competing risk model for analysis, with death as the competing risk, the incidence of RN was 11.6% and 16.5% at 6 and 12 months, respectively, and the incidence of local failure was 16.7% and 19.4% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. There was not a statistically significant association between radiation dose, mean tumor size, number of months between SRS courses, use of WBRT, or use of surgery and the development of RN. Median survival after the second course of SRS was 8.3 months, and median survival for those with and without RN was 14.1 and 7.7 months, respectively (p=0.23). CONCLUSION: Reirradiation with SRS can lead to tumor response in the majority of patients with a low incidence of RN.
Authors: E Shaw; C Scott; L Souhami; R Dinapoli; R Kline; J Loeffler; N Farnan Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2000-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Samir H Patel; Jared R Robbins; Elizabeth M Gore; Jeffrey D Bradley; Laurie E Gaspar; Isabelle Germano; Paiman Ghafoori; Mark A Henderson; Stephen T Lutz; Michael W McDermott; Roy A Patchell; H Ian Robins; Andrew D Vassil; Franz J Wippold; Gregory M Videtic Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: J S Loeffler; H M Kooy; P Y Wen; H A Fine; C W Cheng; E G Mannarino; J S Tsai; E Alexander Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1990-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Samuel T Chao; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Lilyana Angelov; Robert J Weil; Gennady Neyman; Alwyn M Reuther; John H Suh Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Eric L Chang; Jeffrey S Wefel; Kenneth R Hess; Pamela K Allen; Frederick F Lang; David G Kornguth; Rebecca B Arbuckle; J Michael Swint; Almon S Shiu; Moshe H Maor; Christina A Meyers Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-10-02 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Isabela Peña Pino; Jun Ma; Yusuke S Hori; Elena Fomchenko; Kathryn Dusenbery; Margaret Reynolds; Christopher Wilke; Jianling Yuan; Ethan Srinivasan; Matthew Grabowski; Peter Fecci; Evidio Domingo-Musibay; Naomi Fujioka; Gene H Barnett; Veronica Chang; Alireza M Mohammadi; Clark C Chen Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Maximilian J Schwendner; Nico Sollmann; Christian D Diehl; Markus Oechsner; Bernhard Meyer; Sandro M Krieg; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2018-10-02 Impact factor: 6.244