Literature DB >> 35294567

Local recurrence and cerebral progression-free survival after multiple sessions of stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases: a retrospective study of 184 patients : Statistical analysis.

Laure Kuntz1, Clara Le Fèvre1, Delphine Jarnet2, Audrey Keller1, Philippe Meyer2, Caroline Bund3, Isabelle Chambrelant1, Delphine Antoni1, Georges Noel4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Forty to sixty percent of patients treated with focal therapy for brain metastasis (BM) will have distant brain recurrence (C-LR), while 10-25% of patients will have local recurrence (LR) within 1 year after stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). The purpose of this study was to analyze cerebral progression-free survival (C-PFS) and LR of BM among patients treated with repeated courses of radiotherapy in stereotactic conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 184 patients treated for 915 BMs with at least two courses of SRT without previous WBRT. Initial patient characteristics, patient characteristics at each SRT, brain metastasis velocity (BMV), delay between SRT, MRI response, LR and C‑LR were analyzed.
RESULTS: In all, 123 (66.9%), 39 (21.2%), and 22 (12%) patients received 2, 3, or 4 or more SRT sessions, respectively. Ninety percent of BMs were irradiated without prior surgery, and 10% were irradiated after neurosurgery. The MRI response at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after SRT was stable regardless of the SRT session. At 6, 12 and 24 months, the rates of local control were 96.3, 90.1, and 85.8%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, P‑LR was statistically associated with kidney (HR = 0.08) and lung cancer (HR = 0.3), ECOG 1 (HR = 0.5), and high BMV grade (HR = 5.6). The median C‑PFS after SRT1, SRT2, SRT3 and SRT4 and more were 6.6, 5.1, 6.7, and 7.7 months, respectively. C‑PFS after SRT2 was significantly longer among patients in good general condition (HR = 0.39), patients with high KPS (HR = 0.91), patients with no extracerebral progression (HR = 1.8), and patients with a low BMV grade (low vs. high: HR = 3.8).
CONCLUSION: Objective MRI response rate after repeated SRT is stable from session to session. Patients who survive longer, such as patients with breast cancer or with low BMV grade, are at risk of local reirradiation. C‑PFS after SRT2 is better in patients in good general condition, without extracerebral progression and with low BMV grade.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain recurrence; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neoplasm metastases; Reirradiation; Repeated radiosurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35294567     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01913-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   4.033


  50 in total

1.  Neurocognitive function of patients with brain metastasis who received either whole brain radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery or radiosurgery alone.

Authors:  Hidefumi Aoyama; Masao Tago; Norio Kato; Tatsuya Toyoda; Masahiro Kenjyo; Saeko Hirota; Hiroki Shioura; Taisuke Inomata; Etsuo Kunieda; Kazushige Hayakawa; Keiichi Nakagawa; Gen Kobashi; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  [Reirradiation of brain metastasis: Review of the last five years].

Authors:  M-N Nguyen; G Noel; D Antoni
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 1.018

Review 3.  Reirradiation of Recurrent Brain Metastases: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Swathi Chidambaram; Susan C Pannullo; Theodore H Schwartz; A Gabriella Wernicke
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.104

Review 4.  [Stereotactic radiotherapy of brain metastases in complex situations].

Authors:  G Noel; A Keller; D Antoni
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 1.018

5.  Effect of Radiosurgery Alone vs Radiosurgery With Whole Brain Radiation Therapy on Cognitive Function in Patients With 1 to 3 Brain Metastases: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paul D Brown; Kurt Jaeckle; Karla V Ballman; Elana Farace; Jane H Cerhan; S Keith Anderson; Xiomara W Carrero; Fred G Barker; Richard Deming; Stuart H Burri; Cynthia Ménard; Caroline Chung; Volker W Stieber; Bruce E Pollock; Evanthia Galanis; Jan C Buckner; Anthony L Asher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus a stereotactic boost (WBRT+SRS) for one to three brain metastases.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Jan-Dirk Kueter; Dagmar Hornung; Theo Veninga; Patrick Hanssens; Steven E Schild; Juergen Dunst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 7.  Comparison of WBRT alone, SRS alone, and their combination in the treatment of one or more brain metastases: Review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Khan; Jie Lin; Guixiang Liao; Rong Li; Baiyao Wang; Guozhu Xie; Jieling Zheng; Yawei Yuan
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-07

Review 8.  [The role of whole brain radiation therapy for brain metastases].

Authors:  Delphine Antoni; Georges Noël; Françoise Mornex
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 1.276

9.  Dosimetric Study of Automatic Brain Metastases Planning in Comparison with Conventional Multi-Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Mori; Naoki Kaneda; Masahiro Hagiwara; Tuneo Ishiguchi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-11-15

10.  Dosimetric comparison of mono-isocentric and multi-isocentric plans for oligobrain metastases: A single institutional experience.

Authors:  L Kuntz; R Matthis; N Wegner; S Lutz
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 1.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.