Literature DB >> 29293802

The effects of backgrounding system on growing and finishing performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers.

J L Cox-O'Neill, K E Hales, K M Ulmer, R J Rasby, J Parsons, S D Shackelford, H C Freetly, M E Drewnoski.   

Abstract

The objective of this 2-yr study was to evaluate growing and finishing performance as well as carcass characteristics of spring-born steers backgrounded on 3 different systems, using feedstuffs readily available in the Midwest: 1) grazing corn residue and being supplemented with dried distillers plus solubles at 2.68 kg DM/steer 6 d/wk (RESIDUE), 2) grazing a late summer-planted oat-brassica forage mix (CCROP), or 3) being fed a corn silage-based diet in a drylot (DRYLOT). Steers ( = 715) were stratified by BW (278 kg ± 23 in yr 1 and 291 kg ± 91 in yr 2) and assigned to treatment and replicate (4 replications per treatment per yr). Steers assigned to DRYLOT were fed a corn silage-based diet for 54 d in yr 1 and 52 d in yr 2 before being transitioned to the finishing diet. Steers assigned to RESIDUE and those assigned to CCROP grazed 65 d in yr 1 and 66 d in yr 2 and then were fed a corn silage-based diet for 21 d in yr 1 and 33 d in yr 2 before being transitioned to the finishing diet. During backgrounding, the ADG (SEM 0.022) of steers assigned to DRYLOT (1.48 kg/d) was greater ( < 0.01) than that of steers assigned to both CCROP (1.05 kg/d) and RESIDUE (0.87 kg/d) and ADG of steers assigned to CCROP was greater ( < 0.01) than that of steers assigned to RESIDUE. At the start of the finishing period, BW of steers assigned to CCROP (381 kg) was greater ( < 0.01, SEM 2.5) than that of steers assigned to DRYLOT (361 kg) and RESIDUE (366 kg). The finishing period lasted 160 d for all treatments. Both 12th-rib fat ( = 0.89) and calculated yield grade ( = 0.39) did not differ among treatments. Finishing G:F of steers assigned to DRYLOT (0.162 kg/kg) was greater ( < 0.01, SEM 0.0015) than that of steers assigned to RESIDUE (0.153 kg/kg) and CCROP (0.153 kg/kg), which did not differ ( = 0.79). In yr 1, HCW of steers assigned to CCROP (402 kg) was greater ( < 0.01, SEM 2.1) than that of steers assigned to both RESIDUE (389 kg) and DRYLOT (391 kg), which did not differ ( = 0.40). This difference in HCW is most likely a result of differences in BW at the start of the finishing phase in yr 1. However in yr 2, HCW of steers assigned to CCROP (400 kg) and RESIDUE (397 kg) did not differ ( = 0.26, SEM 2.1) but were greater ( < 0.01) than that of steers assigned to DRYLOT (367 kg), despite the fact that steers assigned to RESIDUE entered the finishing phase at a lighter BW than steers assigned to CCROP. Marbling was greater ( = 0.01, SEM 3.9) for steers assigned to DRYLOT (429) than for steers assigned to RESIDUE (414), although steers assigned to CCROP (424) were not different ( ≥ 0.10) from steers assigned to DRYLOT or RESIDUE. When cost and price scenarios from the last 5 yr were conducted, no treatment appeared to be consistently superior in terms of cost of gain or net return. Therefore, all 3 systems appear to be viable options for producers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29293802      PMCID: PMC6292329          DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  On-line prediction of yield grade, longissimus muscle area, preliminary yield grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, and marbling score using the MARC beef carcass image analysis system.

Authors:  S D Shackelford; T L Wheeler; M Koohmaraie
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva.

Authors:  E I McDougall
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1948       Impact factor: 3.857

Review 3.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition.

Authors:  P J Van Soest; J B Robertson; B A Lewis
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 4.  Review of some aspects of growth and development of feedlot cattle.

Authors:  F N Owens; D R Gill; D S Secrist; S W Coleman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effects of winter growing programs on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, body composition, and energy requirements of beef steers.

Authors:  M P McCurdy; G W Horn; J J Wagner; P A Lancaster; C R Krehbiel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  FORAGES AND PASTURES SYMPOSIUM: Optimizing the use of fibrous residues in beef and dairy diets.

Authors:  A K Watson; J C MacDonald; G E Erickson; P J Kononoff; T J Klopfenstein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Yield and quality components of corn crop residues and utilization of these residues by grazing cattle.

Authors:  S Fernandez-Rivera; T J Klopfenstein
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  Southern Section Interdisciplinary Beef Cattle Symposium: Carryover effects of stocker cattle systems on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  R R Reuter; P A Beck
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of beef heifer development system on average daily gain, reproduction, and adaptation to corn residue during first pregnancy.

Authors:  A F Summers; S P Weber; H A Lardner; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.159

  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Forages and pastures symposium: cover crops in livestock production: whole-system approach. Can cover crops pull double duty: conservation and profitable forage production in the Midwestern United States?

Authors:  Mary Drewnoski; Jay Parsons; Humberto Blanco; Daren Redfearn; Kristin Hales; Jim MacDonald
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of yearling steer sequence grazing of perennial and annual forages in an integrated crop and livestock system on grazing performance, delayed feedlot entry, finishing performance, carcass measurements, and systems economics.

Authors:  Songul Sentürklü; Douglas G Landblom; Robert Maddock; Tim Petry; Cheryl J Wachenheim; Steve I Paisley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of feeding dry-rolled corn or whole shelled corn during the finishing phase on growth performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  Tiago B Freitas; Tara L Felix; Chris Clark; Francis L Fluharty; Alejandro E Relling
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-15

4.  Microbiome network traits in the rumen predict average daily gain in beef cattle under different backgrounding systems.

Authors:  Bobwealth O Omontese; Ashok K Sharma; Samuel Davison; Emily Jacobson; Alfredo DiConstanzo; Megan J Webb; Andres Gomez
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-28

Review 5.  Is it time to rethink our one-size-fits-all approach to nitrate toxicity thresholds in forages?

Authors:  Mary Beth Reynolds; Mary E Drewnoski
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-02-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.