Literature DB >> 24668953

Effect of beef heifer development system on average daily gain, reproduction, and adaptation to corn residue during first pregnancy.

A F Summers1, S P Weber1, H A Lardner2, R N Funston3.   

Abstract

Postweaning heifer development systems were evaluated at 2 locations in a 4-yr study for their effect on performance and subsequent adaptation to grazing corn residue as a pregnant heifer. In Exp. 1, heifers were blocked by BW and randomly assigned to graze winter range (WR) or graze winter range and corn residue (CR). In Exp. 2, heifers were assigned to graze winter range and corn residue (CR) or graze winter range and placed in a drylot (DL). Artificial insemination and natural mating were used at breeding on the basis of location. In Exp. 1, heifers developed on corn residue tended (P = 0.11) to have reduced ADG compared with WR heifers. Subsequently, BW at the end of the 82-d corn residue grazing period tended (P = 0.09) to be lower for CR compared with WR heifers. However, the proportion of heifers attaining puberty before the breeding season and pregnancy rates were similar (P ≥ 0.29) for CR and WR heifers. Developing heifers on winter range tended (P = 0.09) to reduce heifer development costs $36/pregnant heifer compared with CR heifers. In Exp. 2, DL heifers had greater (P < 0.01) overall ADG during development compared with CR heifers, resulting in greater (P < 0.01) prebreeding BW for DL heifers compared with CR heifers (355 vs. 322 ± 9 kg). At pregnancy diagnosis BW remained greater (P = 0.02) for DL compared with CR heifers (423 vs. 406 ± 7 kg). Corn-residue-developed heifers had increased (P = 0.03) AI conception rates compared with DL heifers (78% vs. 67% ± 6%). However, there was no difference (P ≥ 0.21) in percent pubertal before the breeding season or final pregnancy rates for CR and DL heifers. Developing heifers on corn residue reduced (P = 0.02) heifer development costs $38/pregnant heifer compared with DL-developed heifers. A subset of pregnant heifers from both experiments grazed corn residue fields in late gestation. As pregnant heifers grazing corn residue, WR heifers (Exp. 1) tended to have reduced ADG compared with CR heifers (0.34 vs. 0.43 ± 0.08 kg/d, P = 0.07). Furthermore, in Exp. 2 CR heifers had greater (0.41 vs. 0.30 ± 0.22 kg/d) ADG grazing corn residue as pregnant heifers compared with DL-developed heifers. Calving date, dystocia score, and calf birth BW were similar (P ≥ 0.15) between development systems in both experiments. There appears to be a potential learned grazing behavior for heifers developed on corn residue allowing them to better adapt to grazing corn residue as pregnant heifers compared with WR and DL heifers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  grazing behavior; heifer development; winter grazing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24668953     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-7225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

1.  Winter grazing of stockpiled native forages during heifer development delays body weight gain without influencing final pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Zachary D McFarlane; Emily R Cope; Jeremy D Hobbs; Renata N Oakes; Ky G Pohler; J Travis Mulliniks
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of postweaning heifer development system on average daily gain, pregnancy rates, and subsequent feed efficiency as a pregnant heifer.

Authors:  S A Springman; H R Nielson; T L Meyer; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The effects of backgrounding system on growing and finishing performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers.

Authors:  J L Cox-O'Neill; K E Hales; K M Ulmer; R J Rasby; J Parsons; S D Shackelford; H C Freetly; M E Drewnoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by pubertal status at time of first breeding.

Authors:  A J Roberts; A Gomes da Silva; A F Summers; T W Geary; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 5.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity1.

Authors:  Adam F Summers; Shelby L Rosasco; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of management system on beef heifer growth and reproductive performance.

Authors:  Parker A Henley; Frank A Ireland; Igor F Canisso; J Lannett Edwards; Daniel W Shike
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  Microbiome network traits in the rumen predict average daily gain in beef cattle under different backgrounding systems.

Authors:  Bobwealth O Omontese; Ashok K Sharma; Samuel Davison; Emily Jacobson; Alfredo DiConstanzo; Megan J Webb; Andres Gomez
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2022-03-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.