Literature DB >> 30060232

Forages and pastures symposium: cover crops in livestock production: whole-system approach. Can cover crops pull double duty: conservation and profitable forage production in the Midwestern United States?

Mary Drewnoski1, Jay Parsons2, Humberto Blanco3, Daren Redfearn3, Kristin Hales4, Jim MacDonald1.   

Abstract

Data from a recent survey suggest that the major reasons Nebraska farmers plant cover crops are to improve soil organic matter, reduce erosion, improve soil water holding capacity, produce forage, and increase soil microbial biomass. Many of these benefits appear to be positively correlated with production of above-ground biomass. Thus, selecting species that will produce the greatest biomass should be beneficial for both soil conservation and forage production. Furthermore, the limited data available suggest that grazing of cover crops does not have large negative crop production, soil, or environmental impact. In the Midwestern United States, the production window following wheat harvest, male row destruction in seed corn, and to a lesser extent following corn silage harvest is long enough to produce 2,500 to 4,500 kg DM per hectare of high-nutritive value, fall forage. In the past 4 yr, we have conducted eight trials using predominantly oats and brassicas planted in mid- to late-August. Forage nutritive value of oats and brassicas is extremely high in early November (70% to 80% IVDMD; 14% to 23% CP) and remains high through December with only a 4% to 7% unit decrease in IVDMD and no change in CP concentration. Thus, it appears that delayed grazing could be an option to maximize potential forage yield. Fall-weaned calves (200 to 290 kg BW) grazing oats with or without brassicas in November and December (48 to 64 d) at stocking rates of 2.5 to 4.0 calves per hectare have ADG between 0.60 and 1.10 kg. The cost of gain has ranged from $0.53 to $2.08/kg when accounting for seed costs plus establishment ($60 to 117/ha), N plus application ($0 to 58/ha), fencing ($11/ha) and yardage ($0.10 calf-1 d-1). Although soybeans and corn harvested for grain do not provide a large enough growing window to accomplish fall grazing, similar dual purpose cover crop practices are often accomplished by planting winter-hardy small grain cereal grasses, such as cereal rye or winter triticale in the fall and grazing in the spring. However, traditional planting dates for corn and soybean result in a 30 to 45 d grazing period prior to corn and a 45 to 60 d period prior to soybean planting. Planting cover crops to provide late fall or early spring grazing has potential. However, incorporating forage production from cover crops into current cropping systems greatly increases the need for timeliness of management since the window of opportunity for forage production is quite narrow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30060232      PMCID: PMC6095385          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  The microbial engines that drive Earth's biogeochemical cycles.

Authors:  Paul G Falkowski; Tom Fenchel; Edward F Delong
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The effects of backgrounding system on growing and finishing performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers.

Authors:  J L Cox-O'Neill; K E Hales; K M Ulmer; R J Rasby; J Parsons; S D Shackelford; H C Freetly; M E Drewnoski
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  Sulfur-associated polioencephalomalacia in cattle grazing plants in the Family Brassicaceae.

Authors:  R A McKenzie; A M Carmichael; M L Schibrowski; S A Duigan; J A Gibson; J D Taylor
Journal:  Aust Vet J       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.281

4.  Cover cropping to reduce nitrate loss through subsurface drainage in the northern U.S. corn belt.

Authors:  J S Strock; P M Porter; M P Russelle
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.751

5.  Effect of hay substitution on intake and digestibility of forage rape (brassica napus) fed to lambs.

Authors:  M G Lambert; S M Abrams; H W Harpster; G A Jung
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Feed intake and apparent digestibility of hay-supplemented brassica diets for lambs.

Authors:  K A Cassida; B A Barton; R L Hough; M H Wiedenhoeft; K Guillard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Fall growth, nutritive value, and estimation of total digestible nutrients for cereal-grain forages in the north-central United States.

Authors:  W K Coblentz; R P Walgenbach
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 3.159

  7 in total
  2 in total

1.  Grazing Cattle, Sheep, and Goats Are Important Parts of a Sustainable Agricultural Future.

Authors:  Temple Grandin
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Production cow-calf responses from perennial forage-based and integrated beef-cropping systems.

Authors:  Zac E Carlson; Levi J McPhillips; Galen E Erickson; Mary E Drewnoski; Jim C MacDonald
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.