| Literature DB >> 29291718 |
Ryosuke Fujii1, Jun Ueyama1, Arisa Aoi1, Naohiro Ichino2, Keisuke Osakabe2, Keiko Sugimoto2, Koji Suzuki3, Nobuyuki Hamajima4, Kenji Wakai5, Takaaki Kondo6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of the redox state of human serum albumin (HSA) on the antioxidant properties of the entire body has been a focus of recent research. The usefulness of HSA redox state as a biomarker for reducing oxidative stress has been investigated in clinical settings; however, evidence for its significance as a health index in non-clinical settings is yet to be established. This study aimed to examine the associations between HSA redox state and the atherosclerotic indices of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and plaque formation in a rural Japanese population.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Carotid intima-media thickness; Carotid plaque formation; Human serum albumin; Oxidative stress; Redox state
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29291718 PMCID: PMC5748967 DOI: 10.1186/s12199-017-0690-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med ISSN: 1342-078X Impact factor: 3.674
Main characteristics of the subjects (n = 281)
| Characteristics | Representative valuesa | |
| Age (years) | 65.3 ± 9.2 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 24.2 ± 3.7 | |
| Mean blood pressure (mmHg)b | 90.5 ± 13.5 | |
| Triacylglycerides (mmol/L) | 0.96 (0.72–1.35) | |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.15 (2.56–3.62) | |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.55 (1.32–1.84) | |
| Blood glucose (mmol/L) | 5.07 ± 0.85 | |
| Max IMT (mm)c | 0.90 (0.75–1.20) | |
| f(HMA) (%)d | 64.0 ± 6.8 | |
| Frequency | % | |
| Sex | ||
| Male | 124 | 44.1 |
| Smoking status | ||
| Never | 151 | 53.7 |
| Ever | 96 | 34.2 |
| Current | 34 | 12.1 |
| Alcohol consumption | ||
| Never | 163 | 58.0 |
| Ever | 13 | 4.6 |
| Current | 105 | 37.4 |
| Exercise habits | ||
| Almost none | 146 | 52.0 |
| 1–2 h/week | 68 | 24.2 |
| 3–4 h/week | 32 | 11.4 |
| ≥ 5 h/week | 35 | 12.5 |
| Medication for non-communicable diseases | ||
| Cerebral stroke | 7 | 2.5 |
| Hypertension | 91 | 32.4 |
| Angina | 5 | 1.8 |
| Diabetes | 24 | 8.6 |
aValues are expressed as arithmetic means ± standard deviations or medians (25th–75th percentiles)
bCalculated as (2 × diastolic pressure + systolic pressure)/3
cIMT denotes intima-media thickness. Max IMT = (right carotid max IMT + left carotid max IMT)/2
dFraction of human mercaptalbumin
Linear regression analysis of the association between selected variables and max IMT
| Independent variables | Unadjusted model | Age- and sex-adjusted model | Fully adjusted model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| f(HMA)a | − 0.25 (− 0.018) | < 0.01 | − 0.10 (− 0.007) | 0.09 | − 0.13 (− 0.010) | 0.03 | |
| Sex (male) | − 0.28 (− 0.277) | < 0.01 | − 0.24 (− 0.230) | < 0.01 | − 0.15 (− 0.151) | 0.04 | |
| Age | 0.42 (0.023) | < 0.01 | 0.35 (0.019) | < 0.01 | 0.32 (0.017) | < 0.01 | |
| Body mass index | − 0.01 (− 0.002) | 0.84 | − 0.12 (− 0.016) | 0.04 | |||
| Mean blood pressureb | 0.26 (0.009) | < 0.01 | 0.13 (0.005) | 0.03 | |||
| Blood glucose | 0.16 (0.005) | 0.01 | 0.07 (0.002) | 0.27 | |||
| Triacylglycerides | 0.01 (0.000) | 0.82 | − 0.02 (0.000) | 0.68 | |||
| HDL cholesterol | − 0.14 (− 0.005) | 0.02 | − 0.02 (− 0.001) | 0.80 | |||
| LDL cholesterol | 0.02 (0.000) | 0.72 | 0.11 (0.002) | 0.04 | |||
| Smoking status | Ever | 0.09 (0.097) | 0.13 | 0.07 (0.075) | 0.28 | ||
| Current | 0.00 (− 0.006) | 0.95 | 0.05 (0.074) | 0.42 | |||
| Alcohol consumption | Ever | 0.14 (0.329) | 0.02 | 0.10 (0.235) | 0.07 | ||
| Current | 0.11 (0.112) | 0.07 | 0.03 (0.026) | 0.69 | |||
| Exercise habits | 1–2 h/week | 0.09 (0.098) | 0.17 | 0.07 (0.082) | 0.21 | ||
| 3–4 h/week | 0.07 (0.107) | 0.26 | 0.05 (0.072) | 0.40 | |||
| ≥ 5 h/week | 0.16 (0.238) | 0.01 | 0.08 (0.118) | 0.17 | |||
| Medication for non-communicable diseases (present) | 0.17 (0.176) | < 0.01 | 0.04 (0.043) | 0.49 | |||
IMT denotes intima-media thickness, βS denotes standardized β, βU denotes unstandardized β, and CI denotes confidence interval
aFraction of human mercaptalbumin
bCalculated as (2 × diastolic pressure + systolic pressure)/3
Logistic regression analysis for the association between selected variables and plaque formation
| Independent variables | Unit | Unadjusted model | Age- and sex-adjusted model | Fully adjusted model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||
| f(HMA)a | % | 0.87 (0.80, 0.94) | < 0.01 | 0.92 (0.85, 1.01) | 0.07 | 0.89 (0.81, 0.97) | < 0.01 | |
| Sex (male) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.95) | < 0.01 | 0.87 (0.78, 0.97) | < 0.01 | 0.91 (0.79, 1.06) | 0.23 | ||
| Age | Year | 1.14 (1.08, 1.21) | < 0.01 | 1.10 (1.03, 1.17) | < 0.01 | 1.07 (0.99, 1.15) | 0.09 | |
| Body mass index | kg/m2 | 1.00 (0.86, 1.16) | 0.98 | 0.88 (0.75, 1.04) | 0.13 | |||
| Mean blood pressureb | mmHg | 1.05 (1.01, 1.09) | 0.02 | 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) | 0.58 | |||
| Blood glucose | mmol/L | 2.60 (1.37, 4.91) | < 0.01 | 2.10 (1.06, 4.14) | 0.03 | |||
| Triacylglycerides | mmol/L | 1.10 (0.56, 2.15) | 0.79 | 0.88 (0.44, 1.79) | 0.73 | |||
| HDL cholesterol | mmol/L | 0.32 (0.08, 1.31) | 0.12 | 0.91 (0.18, 14.8) | 0.92 | |||
| LDL cholesterol | mmol/L | 0.87 (0.45, 1.71) | 0.70 | 1.10 (0.56, 2.18) | 0.79 | |||
| Smoking statusc | Ever | 1.09 (0.97, 1.23) | 0.15 | 1.03 (0.93, 1.19) | 0.67 | |||
| Current | 0.94 (0.79, 1.12) | 0.48 | 0.96 (0.88, 1.16) | 0.70 | ||||
| Alcohol consumptionc | Ever | 1.65 (1.27, 2.13) | < 0.01 | 1.59 (1.22, 2.07) | < 0.01 | |||
| Current | 1.08 (0.96, 1.20) | 0.20 | 1.01 (0.89, 1.15) | 0.83 | ||||
| Exercise habitsd | 1–2 h/week | 1.08 (0.95, 1.24) | 0.25 | 1.07 (0.93, 1.22) | 0.34 | |||
| 3–4 h/week | 1.07 (0.90, 1.28) | 0.44 | 1.04 (0.88, 1.24) | 0.62 | ||||
| ≥ 5 h/week | 1.17 (0.98, 1.39) | 0.08 | 1.10 (0.92, 1.30) | 0.30 | ||||
| Medication for non-communicable diseases (present) | 1.14 (1.02, 1.28) | 0.02 | 1.02 (0.90, 1.16) | 0.73 | ||||
The number of participants with/without plaque formation was 90/191
OR denotes odds ratio. For continuous variables, the OR indicates the risk elevation per every 10-unit increment. CI denotes confidence interval
aFraction of human mercaptalbumin
bCalculated as (2 × diastolic pressure + systolic pressure)/3
c“Never” was used as the reference
d“Almost none” was used as the reference