| Literature DB >> 29286429 |
Jean-Baptiste Guy1, Sophie Espenel1, Alexis Vallard1, Priscillia Battiston-Montagne2, Anne-Sophie Wozny3, Dominique Ardail3, Gersende Alphonse3, Chloé Rancoule1, Claire Rodriguez-Lafrasse3, Nicolas Magne4.
Abstract
The invasion and migration abilities of tumor cells are main contributors to cancer progression and recurrence. Many studies have explored the migration and invasion abilities to understand how cancer cells disseminate, with the aim of developing new treatment strategies. Analysis of the cellular and molecular basis of these abilities has led to the characterization of cell mobility and the physicochemical properties of the cytoskeleton and cellular microenvironment. For many years, the Boyden chamber assay and the scratch wound assay have been the standard techniques to study cell invasion and migration. However, these two techniques have limitations. The Boyden chamber assay is difficult and time consuming, and the scratch wound assay has low reproducibility. Development of modern technologies, especially in microscopy, has increased the reproducibility of the scratch wound assay. Using powerful analysis systems, an "in-incubator" video microscope can be used to provide automatic and real-time analysis of cell migration and invasion. The aim of this paper is to report and compare the two assays used to study cell invasion and migration: the Boyden chamber assay and an optimized in vitro video microscope-based scratch wound assay.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29286429 PMCID: PMC5755419 DOI: 10.3791/56337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vis Exp ISSN: 1940-087X Impact factor: 1.355