Literature DB >> 16086220

A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study.

N Y Wong1, K W Eu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Defunctioning ileostomy or colostomy is still routinely performed after low anterior resection in the belief that diverting the fecal stream will prevent anastomotic dehiscence. However, an ileostomy is not without morbidity for the patient. This study aims to determine if a diverting stoma is really necessary after a low anastomosis.
METHODS: All low or ultralow anterior resections done in this department were performed by consultant-grade surgeons in a standardized manner. The patients were all monitored closely after surgery for clinical signs of an anastomotic leak. There were 1078 patients who underwent elective low or ultralow anterior resections in a ten-year period between 1994 and 2004. Twelve of them were irradiated before surgery; they were excluded from the study. During a seven-month period from February 2004 through August 2004, 324 patients who underwent such procedures were not defunctioned. These were compared with 742 patients who were previously defunctioned with a proximal stoma. The results were analyzed using the Pearson chi-squared test.
RESULTS: Thirteen (4 percent) patients who were not defunctioned developed a clinical anastomotic leak, whereas the leak rate for those who were defunctioned was 3.8 percent. There was no statistical difference demonstrated. Ninety-five percent of patients who developed a leak required surgical intervention; the remaining 5 percent could be dealt with by radiologic drainage. The overall mortality rate for anastomotic leak in this department is 7.3 percent.
CONCLUSION: A diverting stoma does not reduce postoperative anastomotic leak rate. Rather, it reduces the otherwise catastrophic effects of an anastomotic leak such as fecal peritonitis and septicemia. An ileostomy carries certain morbidity and also adds to the cost of the entire operation. Therefore, it should not be performed routinely. Instead, it should be performed selectively in patients with poorly prepared bowels, coupled with a distal limb washout, and in patients with significant comorbidities who can ill afford the complications of a leak.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086220     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0146-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  67 in total

1.  Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection.

Authors:  Elyamani Fouda; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Enas A Hammad; Gamal Othman; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Incidence, consequences, and risk factors for anastomotic dehiscence after colorectal surgery: a prospective monocentric study.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Pascal Gervaz; Michelle Secic; Pascal Bucher; Béatrice Mugnier-Konrad; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Predictive score for anastomotic leakage after elective colorectal cancer surgery: a decision making tool for choice of protective measures.

Authors:  Fuad Pasic; Nermin N Salkic
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Outcome of Bowel Resection in Women with Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ajit Sebastian; Anitha Thomas; Gigi Varghese; Bijesh Yadav; Rachel Chandy; Abraham Peedicayil
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-20

Review 5.  Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  In Ja Park
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  What is the risk of clinical anastomotic leak in the diverted colorectal anastomosis?

Authors:  Jennifer Leahy; David Schoetz; Peter Marcello; Thomas Read; Jason Hall; Patricia Roberts; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Ghost ileostomy after anterior resection for rectal cancer: a preliminary experience.

Authors:  Nino Gullà; Stefano Trastulli; Carlo Boselli; Roberto Cirocchi; Davide Cavaliere; Giorgio Maria Verdecchia; Umberto Morelli; Daniele Gentile; Emilio Eugeni; Daniela Caracappa; Chiara Listorti; Francesco Sciannameo; Giuseppe Noya
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Reconstruction techniques after proctectomy: what's the best?

Authors:  Sebastian G de la Fuente; Christopher R Mantyh
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2007-08

9.  Standardized algorithms for management of anastomotic leaks and related abdominal and pelvic abscesses after colorectal surgery.

Authors:  R Phitayakorn; C P Delaney; H L Reynolds; B J Champagne; A G Heriot; P Neary; A J Senagore
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Anastomotic leak rate and outcome for laparoscopic intra-corporeal stapled anastomosis.

Authors:  Vitali Goriainov; Andrew J Miles
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.