Literature DB >> 29285654

Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.

Monica Hagan Vetter1, Marilly Palettas2, Erinn Hade2, Jeffrey Fowler3, Ritu Salani3.   

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to describe robotic-assisted surgery training programs currently being used by ACGME-accredited obstetrics and gynecology (OB/Gyn) residency programs and to explore residents' attitudes towards their robotic surgery training curricula to evaluate resident desire for robotics training. We conducted a cross-sectional study of OB/Gyn residents for the 2015-2016 academic year. Participants completed a 31-item online questionnaire regarding their robotic-assisted surgical training and associated perspectives. Analyses of these data were primarily descriptive. In total, 98.9% of included respondents (N = 177) reported availability of a surgical robot at their training institution, and 35.0% of participants reported not having any structured robotics training program at their institution. The most commonly used training modalities included online modules (62.2%), dual-assist console (55.1%) and virtual reality simulation (50.3%). The most commonly reported barriers to completing a robots training were a lack of personal time (56.2%) and availability of the virtual reality simulator or access to the robotic equipment (29.2%). OB/Gyn residents desire robotics training and are exposed to a wide variety of training modalities. The ACGME should consider recommending the incorporation of a standardized formal robotics training program as part of the OB/Gyn residency curriculum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Gynecology; Residents; Robotics training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29285654     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0775-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  15 in total

1.  Are you ready to become a robo-surgeon?

Authors:  Yatin R Patel; Harry W Donias; Douglas W Boyd; Ravi U Pande; Jeffery L Amodeo; Raffy L Karamanoukian; Giuseppe D'Ancona; Hratch L Karamanoukian
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Survey of robotic surgery training in obstetrics and gynecology residency.

Authors:  Joseph M Gobern; Christopher M Novak; Ernest G Lockrow
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Comprehensive proficiency-based inanimate training for robotic surgery: reliability, feasibility, and educational benefit.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Genevieve Dulan; Deborah C Hogg; Robert V Rege; Cathryn E Powers; Seifu T Tesfay; Linda S Hynan; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Training and learning robotic surgery, time for a more structured approach: a systematic review.

Authors:  H W R Schreuder; R Wolswijk; R P Zweemer; M P Schijven; R H M Verheijen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Impact of a robotic simulation program on resident surgical performance.

Authors:  Alison Vogell; Harneet Gujral; Kelly N Wright; Valena W Wright; Robin Ruthazer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Assessment of robotic simulation by trainees in residency programs of the Southeastern Section of the American Urologic Association.

Authors:  David D Thiel; Vipul R Patel; Todd Larson; Amy Lannen; Raymond J Leveillee
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training.

Authors:  Behzad S Farivar; Molly Flannagan; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents' training and opinions on robotic surgery.

Authors:  Aimee L Smith; Karen M Schneider; Pamela D Berens
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

9.  Virtual reality robotic surgical simulation: an analysis of gynecology trainees.

Authors:  Sangini S Sheth; Amanda N Fader; Ana I Tergas; Christina L Kushnir; Isabel C Green
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Committee opinion no. 628: robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  6 in total

1.  Making the Jump: A Qualitative Analysis on the Transition From Bedside Assistant to Console Surgeon in Robotic Surgery Training.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Hannah M Hollandsworth; Arielle M Lee; Jenny Lam; Nicole E Lopez; Benjamin Abbadessa; Samuel Eisenstein; Bard C Cosman; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Lisa A Parry
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.891

2.  Low confidence levels with the robotic platform among senior surgical residents: simulation training is needed.

Authors:  Francisco Schlottmann; Jason M Long; Sean Brown; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-08-11

3.  Re: Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program.

Authors:  Noah E Canvasser; Jeffrey Gahan; Igor Sorokin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-06

4.  Integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  General surgery training in the era of robotic surgery: a qualitative analysis of perceptions from resident and attending surgeons.

Authors:  Beiqun Zhao; Jenny Lam; Hannah M Hollandsworth; Arielle M Lee; Nicole E Lopez; Benjamin Abbadessa; Samuel Eisenstein; Bard C Cosman; Sonia L Ramamoorthy; Lisa A Parry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Residency Training in Robotic General Surgery: A Survey of Program Directors.

Authors:  Lea C George; Rebecca O'Neill; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.