Literature DB >> 12889624

Are you ready to become a robo-surgeon?

Yatin R Patel1, Harry W Donias, Douglas W Boyd, Ravi U Pande, Jeffery L Amodeo, Raffy L Karamanoukian, Giuseppe D'Ancona, Hratch L Karamanoukian.   

Abstract

Robotic and minimally invasive surgery represents the future of modern surgical care. However, its role during the training of surgical residents has yet to be investigated. A previous study conducted by our group surveyed program directors at accredited general surgery training programs in the United States to determine the prevalence and application of robotics in their residency programs. This current study is a follow-up survey sent to residents across the United States to see whether they were being adequately trained and exposed to robotic surgery during their training. A survey was sent to 1800 general surgery residents, and their responses were tabulated and analyzed. Twenty-three per cent of the 1800 residents responded to our survey. An overwhelming 57 per cent of the responders indicated a high interest in robotic surgery. However, 80 per cent of the responders indicated not having a robotic training program. Robotic surgery has led to many promising advancements within the surgical subspecialties. With this emerging technology comes the need for a greater emphasis on the training of surgeons in robotics during their residency.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12889624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Status of robotic-assisted surgery among Canadian urology residents.

Authors:  Michael Robinson; Andrew Macneily; Larry Goldenberg; Peter Black
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Training and outcome monitoring in robotic urologic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Liberman; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Claudio Jeldres; Luc Valiquette; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Robotic surgery: applications, limitations, and impact on surgical education.

Authors:  Bishoy Morris
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-09-27

4.  Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Survey of minimally invasive general surgery fellows training in robotic surgery.

Authors:  Abhijit Shaligram; Avishai Meyer; Anton Simorov; Pradeep Pallati; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-05-13

6.  Survey of obstetrics and gynecology residents' training and opinions on robotic surgery.

Authors:  Aimee L Smith; Karen M Schneider; Pamela D Berens
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2010-03-18

7.  Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.

Authors:  Monica Hagan Vetter; Marilly Palettas; Erinn Hade; Jeffrey Fowler; Ritu Salani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-28

8.  The impact of fellowship surgical training on operative time and patient morbidity during robotics-assisted sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Charelle M Carter-Brooks; Angela L Du; Michael J Bonidie; Jonathan P Shepherd
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Residency Training in Robotic General Surgery: A Survey of Program Directors.

Authors:  Lea C George; Rebecca O'Neill; Aziz M Merchant
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-05-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.