Literature DB >> 25730256

Committee opinion no. 628: robotic surgery in gynecology.

.   

Abstract

The field of robotic surgery has developed rapidly, and its use for gynecologic conditions has grown exponentially. Surgeons should be skilled at abdominal and laparoscopic approaches for a specific procedure before undertaking robotic approaches. Surgeon training, competency guidelines, and quality metrics should be developed at the institutional level. Robot-assisted cases should be appropriately selected based on the available data and expert opinion. As with any surgical procedure, repetition drives competency. Ongoing quality assurance is essential to ensure appropriate use of the technology and, most importantly, patient safety. Adoption of new surgical techniques should be driven by what is best for the patient, as determined by evidence-based medicine rather than external pressures. Well-designed randomized controlled trials or comparably rigorous nonrandomized prospective trials are needed to determine which patients are likely to benefit from robot-assisted surgery and to establish the potential risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25730256     DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000461761.47981.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Benjamin B Albright; Tilman Witte; Alena N Tofte; Jeremy Chou; Jonathan D Black; Vrunda B Desai; Elisabeth A Erekson
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Randomized controlled trial comparing operative times between standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Timothy A Deimling; Jennifer L Eldridge; Kristin A Riley; Allen R Kunselman; Gerald J Harkins
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 3.  The current state and the future of robotic surgery in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Rachael D Sussman; Benoit Peyronnet; Benjamin M Brucker
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2019-09-01

4.  Time to consider integration of a formal robotic-assisted surgical training program into obstetrics/gynecology residency curricula.

Authors:  Monica Hagan Vetter; Marilly Palettas; Erinn Hade; Jeffrey Fowler; Ritu Salani
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-12-28

5.  Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  W J van Weelden; B B M Gordon; E A Roovers; A A Kraayenbrink; C I M Aalders; F Hartog; F P H L J Dijkhuizen
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2017-04-25

6.  Delayed Presentation of Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence after Robotic Hysterectomy for Gynecologic Cancer: A Case Series and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Pamela A Escobar; Gregory M Gressel; Gary L Goldberg; Dennis Yi-Shin Kuo
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-03-27

Review 7.  Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.

Authors:  Jean Bouquet de Joliniere; Armando Librino; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Fathi Khomsi; Nordine Ben Ali; Anis Fadhlaoui; J M Ayoubi; Anis Feki
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-05-02

8.  Best Practices for Robotic Surgery Programs.

Authors:  Stephanie J Estes; David Goldenberg; Joshua S Winder; Ryan M Juza; Jerome R Lyn-Sue
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Setting Benchmarks for the New User: Training on the Robotic Simulator.

Authors:  Shayan M Dioun; Nicole D Fleming; Mark F Munsell; Joseph Lee; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 10.  The age of robotic surgery - Is laparoscopy dead?

Authors:  Hartwig Schwaibold; Felix Wiesend; Christian Bach
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2018-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.