Literature DB >> 29282642

Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans.

Megan N Siemens1, Debbie M Kelly2,3.   

Abstract

This study examined whether differences in the amount of information provided to men and women, in the form of verbal instruction, influenced their encoding during a reorientation task. When a navigator needs to orient, featural (e.g., colour or texture) and geometry (e.g., metric information) are used to determine which direction to begin traveling. The current study used a spatial reorientation task to examine how men and women use featural and geometric cues and whether the content of the task's instructions influenced how these cues were used. Participants were trained to find a target location in a rectangular room with distinctive objects situated at each corner. Once the participants were accurately locating the target, various tests manipulating the spatial information were conducted. We found both men and women encoded the featural cues, and even though the features provided reliable information, participants generally showed an encoding of geometry. However, when participants were not provided with any information about the spatial aspects of the task in the instructions, they failed to encode geometry. We also found that women used distant featural cues as landmarks when the featural cue closest to the target was removed, whereas men did not. Yet, when the two types of cues were placed in conflict, both sexes weighed featural cues more heavily than geometric cues. The content of the task instructions also influenced how cues were relied upon in this conflict situation. Our results have important implications for our understanding of how spatial cues are used for reorientation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Feature; Geometry; Human; Reorientation; Sex differences; Task instructions

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29282642     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-017-0783-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  27 in total

1.  Is language necessary for human spatial reorientation? Reconsidering evidence from dual task paradigms.

Authors:  Kristin R Ratliff; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Early sex differences in weighting geometric cues.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Dede Addy; Janellen Huttenlocher; Lydia Fabian
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-09-09

3.  How do young children determine location? Evidence from disorientation tasks.

Authors:  Stella F Lourenco; Janellen Huttenlocher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-09-26

4.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.

Authors:  N J Sandstrom; J Kaufman; S A Huettel
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1998-04

5.  Modularity and development: the case of spatial reorientation.

Authors:  L Hermer; E Spelke
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1996-12

6.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies?

Authors:  Deborah M Saucier; Sheryl M Green; Jennifer Leason; Alastair MacFadden; Scott Bell; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Reorientation in a two-dimensional environment: I. Do adults encode the featural and geometric properties of a two-dimensional schematic of a room?

Authors:  Debbie M Kelly; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children.

Authors:  L Hermer; E S Spelke
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Orienting in virtual environments: How are surface features and environmental geometry weighted in an orientation task?

Authors:  Debbie M Kelly; Walter F Bischof
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-10-02

10.  Sex differences in directional cue use in a virtual landscape.

Authors:  Xiaoqian J Chai; Lucia F Jacobs
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.