Gabriel Lozano-Berges1,2,3,4, Ángel Matute-Llorente1,2,3,4, Alejandro González-Agüero1,2,3,4, Alejandro Gómez-Bruton1,2,3,4, Alba Gómez-Cabello1,3,4,5, Germán Vicente-Rodríguez1,2,3,4, José A Casajús6,7,8,9. 1. GENUD "Growth, Exercise, NUtrition, and Development", Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. 2. Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain. 3. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2-(Universidad de Zaragoza -CITA), Zaragoza, Spain. 4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Madrid, Spain. 5. Centro Universitario de la Defensa, Zaragoza, Spain. 6. GENUD "Growth, Exercise, NUtrition, and Development", Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. joseant@unizar.es. 7. Faculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing, Universidad de Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain. joseant@unizar.es. 8. Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón-IA2-(Universidad de Zaragoza -CITA), Zaragoza, Spain. joseant@unizar.es. 9. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERObn), Madrid, Spain. joseant@unizar.es.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of soccer practice on bone in male and female children and adolescents. MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases were searched for scientific articles published up to and including October 2016. Twenty-seven studies were included in this systematic review (13 in the meta-analysis). The meta-analysis was performed by using OpenMeta[Analyst] software. It is well documented that soccer practice during childhood provides positive effects on bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) compared to sedentary behaviors and other sports, such as tennis, weightlifting, or swimming. Furthermore, soccer players present higher BMC and BMD in most weight-bearing sites such as the whole body, lumbar spine, hip, and legs. Moreover, bone differences were minimized between groups during prepuberty. Therefore, the maturity status should be considered when evaluating bone. According to meta-analysis results, soccer practice was positively associated with whole-body BMD either in males (mean difference 0.061; 95%CI, 0.042-0.079) or in females (mean difference 0.063; 95%CI, 0.026-0.099). CONCLUSION: Soccer may be considered a sport that positively affects bone mass during growth. Pubertal soccer players presented increased bone mass compared to controls or other athletes; however, these bone differences are minimized during the prepubertal stage. What is known: • It has been described that childhood and adolescence are important periods for bone mass and structure. • Previous studies have demonstrated that soccer participation improves bone mass in male and female children and adolescents. What is new: • The differences between soccer players and controls are more marked during puberty than prepuberty. • Weight-bearing sites such as lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanteric region and both legs are particularly sensitive to soccer actions.
The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of soccer practice on bone in male and female children and adolescents. MEDLINE, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases were searched for scientific articles published up to and including October 2016. Twenty-seven studies were included in this systematic review (13 in the meta-analysis). The meta-analysis was performed by using OpenMeta[Analyst] software. It is well documented that soccer practice during childhood provides positive effects on bone mineral content (BMC) and density (BMD) compared to sedentary behaviors and other sports, such as tennis, weightlifting, or swimming. Furthermore, soccer players present higher BMC and BMD in most weight-bearing sites such as the whole body, lumbar spine, hip, and legs. Moreover, bone differences were minimized between groups during prepuberty. Therefore, the maturity status should be considered when evaluating bone. According to meta-analysis results, soccer practice was positively associated with whole-body BMD either in males (mean difference 0.061; 95%CI, 0.042-0.079) or in females (mean difference 0.063; 95%CI, 0.026-0.099). CONCLUSION: Soccer may be considered a sport that positively affects bone mass during growth. Pubertal soccer players presented increased bone mass compared to controls or other athletes; however, these bone differences are minimized during the prepubertal stage. What is known: • It has been described that childhood and adolescence are important periods for bone mass and structure. • Previous studies have demonstrated that soccer participation improves bone mass in male and female children and adolescents. What is new: • The differences between soccer players and controls are more marked during puberty than prepuberty. • Weight-bearing sites such as lumbar spine, hip, femoral neck, trochanter, intertrochanteric region and both legs are particularly sensitive to soccer actions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone mass; Bone tissue; Football; Sports
Authors: Béatrice Ferry; Eric Lespessailles; Pierre Rochcongar; Martine Duclos; Daniel Courteix Journal: Joint Bone Spine Date: 2012-03-09 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Dimitris Vlachopoulos; Alan R Barker; Craig A Williams; SIGURBJöRN A ARNGRíMSSON; Karen M Knapp; Brad S Metcalf; Ioannis G Fatouros; Luis A Moreno; Luis Gracia-Marco Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Ricardo R Agostinete; Kyle R Lynch; Luís A Gobbo; Manoel Carlos Spiguel Lima; Igor H Ito; Rafael Luiz-de-Marco; Mario A Rodrigues-Junior; Romulo A Fernandes Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Bareket Falk; Sarah Braid; Michael Moore; Matthew Yao; Phil Sullivan; Nota Klentrou Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: A Gomez-Bruton; A Gonzalez-Aguero; A Matute-Llorente; G Lozano-Berges; A Gomez-Cabello; L A Moreno; J A Casajus; G Vicente-Rodríguez Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Breanne S Baker; Zhaojing Chen; Rebecca D Larson; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2020-03-03 Impact factor: 2.041
Authors: P Ferrer; I Iglesia; B Muniz-Pardos; M L Miguel-Berges; P Flores-Barrantes; A Gomez-Bruton; L A Moreno; G Rodríguez Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Ricardo R Agostinete; André O Werneck; Santiago Maillane-Vanegas; Luis Gracia-Marco; Esther Ubago-Guisado; Annie M Constable; Romulo A Fernandes; Dimitris Vlachopoulos Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 3.390