| Literature DB >> 29282103 |
Danesh Moradigaravand1, Theodore Gouliouris2,3,4, Beth Blane5, Plamena Naydenova5, Catherine Ludden6, Charles Crawley7, Nicholas M Brown7,8, M Estée Török5,7,8, Julian Parkhill9, Sharon J Peacock9,5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecium is a leading cause of hospital-acquired infection, particularly in the immunocompromised. Here, we use whole genome sequencing of E. faecium to study within-host evolution and the transition from gut carriage to invasive disease.Entities:
Keywords: Enterococcus faecium; Genome sequencing; Within-host evolution
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29282103 PMCID: PMC5744393 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-017-0507-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Med ISSN: 1756-994X Impact factor: 11.117
Fig. 1a Neighbour-joining tree of 180 E. faecium genomes used in this study. BAPS clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 are inferred BAPS groups that all contained invasive isolates. The pie charts for BAPS groups 1, 2, 3 and 4 contain 13, 87, 26 and 26 isolates, respectively. The BAPS groups were on average 4797.97 SNPs apart. The average pairwise SNP distance for isolates within BAPS1, 2, 3 and 4 were 3.97, 2.13, 2.86 and 1.30, respectively. The BAPS run columns correspond to clustering results with five and ten values for the estimated numbers of clusters in the hierBAPS analysis. Each colour signifies one group. BAPS groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, which contained invasive isolates, were inferred with both parameter sets. The root of the tree is the midpoint of the two most distant taxa in the collection. Frequency of isolates based on patient (b) and source of isolation (c) across four BAPS groups
Fig. 2Bayesian phylogenetic tree for patient B/BAPS2 group. Branches and nodes are coloured based on the inferred origin of ancestral strains. The size of the diamond signs shows the posterior probability values for the inferred status. The bars on the nodes denote 95% confidence intervals, i.e. the credible set that contains 95% of the sampled values
Fig. 3Transmission tree of BAPS2 isolates from three patients reconstructed based on genetic distance and isolate dates. The edge numbers denote the number of mutations. Arrows model potential transmissions from ancestors
Fig. 4Phylogenetic distribution of genes encoding antibiotic resistance and virulence factors. Note that only virulence factors that were variably present in the population are shown, meaning that some of the well-known virulence factors, e.g. sagA and atlAEfm, present in every isolate are not shown. The sequence file for the virulence factors studied here is provided in Additional file 1. Note that the vanB-containing isolate was phenotypically susceptible to vancomycin due to lack of vanR and vanS
Fig. 5Frequency of resistant and susceptible isolates across the phylogenetic tree for antibiotics tested in this study