| Literature DB >> 15963275 |
Rob J L Willems1, Janetta Top, Marga van Santen, D Ashley Robinson, Teresa M Coque, Fernando Baquero, Hajo Grundmann, Marc J M Bonten.
Abstract
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) have caused hospital outbreaks worldwide, and the vancomycin-resistance gene (vanA) has crossed genus boundaries to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Spread of VRE, therefore, represents an immediate threat for patient care and creates a reservoir of mobile resistance genes for other, more virulent pathogens. Evolutionary genetics, population structure, and geographic distribution of 411 VRE and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus faecium isolates, recovered from human and nonhuman sources and community and hospital reservoirs in 5 continents, identified a genetic lineage of E. faecium (complex-17) that has spread globally. This lineage is characterized by 1) ampicillin resistance, 2) a pathogenicity island, and 3) an association with hospital outbreaks. Complex-17 is an example of cumulative evolutionary processes that improved the relative fitness of bacteria in hospital environments. Preventing further spread of this epidemic E. faecium subpopulation is critical, and efforts should focus on the early disclosure of ampicillin-resistant complex-17 strains.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15963275 PMCID: PMC3367597 DOI: 10.3201/1106.041204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Clustering of 175 sequence types representing 411 isolates with eBURST (25). This algorithm identifies the founder of a complex or genogroup of related sequence types (ST) and subsequent patterns of evolutionary descent. The primary founder, indicated in blue, of a complex is defined as the ST with the largest number of single locus variants (SLVs). Larger complexes may contain secondary founders of additional lineages that have a number of SLVs of their own. These secondary founders are indicated in yellow. Numbers correspond to ST numbers. The area of each circle corresponds to the number of isolates of the ST. All complexes (major and minor) are shown. In addition, 57 STs did not group into any of the complexes and were considered singletons (STs 13, 15, 30, 31, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 51, 52, 58, 59, 62, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 73, 74, 83, 84, 86, 89, 95, 96, 98, 99, 100, 102, 105, 107, 108, 110, 112, 114, 116, 118, 126, 129, 131, 142, 144, 145, 152, 153, 155, 162, 163, 164, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172). The "epidemic" genetic complex-17 derived from secondary founder ST-17 is indicated. A measurement of statistical confidence in each of the assigned primary founders is made by a bootstrap resampling procedure (25).The predicted primary founders of the complexes 22, 94, 1, and 69 have a bootstrap value of 73%, 84%, 85%, and 59%, respectively.
Frequency of ampicillin and glycopeptide resistance, the presence of the pathogenicity island (PAI), and log odds of all complex-17 and non–complex-17
| Epidemiologic source | Genetic and phenotypic features* | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complex-17 | Other† | Complex-17 | Other† | Complex-17 | Other† | Complex-17‡ | Other†‡ | Log odds§ | |||||||
| AmR | AmS | AmR | AmS | PAI+ | PAI– | PAI+ | PAI– | VanR | VanS | VanR | VanS | ||||
| Animal surveillance (n = 96), % | 1 | 0 | 2 | 93 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 1 | 43 | 52 | 1 [1] | 95 [99] | –4.55 |
| Community surveillance (n = 57), % | 0 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 37 | 3 [5] | 54 [95] | –2.89 |
| Hospital surveillance (n = 64), % | 14 | 0 | 7 | 40 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 49 | 13 | 2 | 32 | 17 | 15 [23] | 49 [77] | –1.18 |
| Clinical (n = 162), % | 85 | 2 | 13 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 4 | 57 | 21 | 73 | 22 | 45 | 95 [59] | 67 [51 | 0.35 |
| Hospital outbreak (n = 32), % | 26 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 28 [88] | 4 [12] | 1.95 |
*Ampicillin resistant (AmR) or susceptible (AmS) not determined in 30 isolates, PAI present (PAI+) or absent (PA–) not determined in 17 isolates, vancomycin resistant (VanR) or susceptible (VanS) not determined in 1 isolate. †Not belonging to complex-17. ‡Numbers in brackets refer to the percentage of isolates that belong to the complex. §The natural logarithm of the proportion of samples from an epidemiologic source belonging to complex-17.
Parameter estimates by using a logistic regression model*
| Regression lines | Parameter estimates | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| b0 | bamp | bPAI | bgly | bepi | p value | |
| Complex-17 crude | –4.44 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 | 0.000 |
| Corrected for amp | –6.61 | 5.38 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 |
| Corrected for PAI | –6.29 | 5.08 | 1.06 | 0 | 0.84 | 0.038 |
| Corrected for gly | –6.07 | 5.12 | 1.01 | –0.45 | 0.83 | 0.316 |
*Amp, ampicillin resistance; PAI, presence of the Enterococcus faecium pathogenicity island; gly, glycopeptide resistance; epi, epidemiologic source (animal surveillance, community surveillance, hospital surveillance, clinical sample, hospital outbreak).
Figure 2Relative abundance of complex-17 in various sampled categories and proportion increase explained by combined effect of 3 parameters. 0, animal surveillance samples; 1, human community surveillance samples; 2, human hospitalized patient samples; 3, human clinical samples; 4, hospital outbreak samples; amp, ampicillin resistance; PAI, pathogenicity island; gly, glycopeptide resistance.
Variant alleles of single locus variants (SLVs) within 5 genetic complexes*
| ST of ancestor | ST of SLV | Variant locus | Ancestral allele | SLV allele | No. nucleotide differences (amino acid change) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 64 |
| 1 | 7 | 4 |
| 17 | 117 |
| 1 | 9 | 20 |
| 17 | 78 |
| 1 | 15 | 22 |
| 17 | 16 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 17 | 63 |
| 1 | 21 | 1 (C-Y)† |
| 17 | 174 |
| 1 | 29 | 1† |
| 22 | 32 |
| 2 | 3 | 2 |
| 22 | 21 |
| 2 | 9 | 18 |
| 22 | 92 |
| 2 | 5 | 19 |
| 22 | 71 |
| 2 | 15 | 20 |
| 22 | 135 |
| 2 | 27 | 18 |
| 22 | 159 |
| 2 | 30 | 1† |
| 22 | 113 |
| 2 | 26 | 19 |
| 22 | 55 |
| 3 | 1 | 6 |
| 22 | 111 |
| 1 | 6 | 1 |
| 22 | 24 |
| 2 | 7 | 3 |
| 22 | 136 |
| 2 | 26 | 1 (H-Y)† |
| 22 | 33 |
| 1 | 5 | 1 (L-V)† |
| 22 | 23 |
| 1 | 7 | 1† |
| 1 | 43 |
| 8 | 3 | 16 |
| 1 | 41 |
| 7 | 3 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 9 | 1 (Y-H)† |
| 1 | 3 |
| 1 | 12 | 1 (Y-N)† |
| 94 | 40 |
| 13 | 10 | 3 |
| 94 | 60 |
| 6 | 11 | 1 |
| 94 | 61 |
| 10 | 17 | 4 |
| 94 | 178 |
| 10 | 27 | 2 |
| 69 | 46 |
| 9 | 5 | 1 |
| 69 | 161 |
| 9 | 3 | 16 |
| 69 | 47 |
| 6 | 5 | 4 |
*Genetic complexes 1, 17, 22, 69, and 94 were included in this analysis. ST, sequence type; C, cysteine; Y, tyrosine; H, histidine; L, leucine; V, valine; N, asparagine. †Single nucleotide changes that are unique in the dataset and thus are due to mutation.
Figure 3Sequence diversity versus allelic diversity. The average number of nucleotide (nt) differences in nonidentical alleles for all pairwise comparisons of the 178 Enterococcus faecium sequence types (STs), and the 15 STs belonging to complex-17 was calculated separately for allelic profiles that differ in 1–7 alleles. This computation shows no positive correlation between the number of nucleotide differences and allelic differences, which suggests that recombination has played an important role in the genetic diversification in E. faecium, including the STs that constitute complex-17.
Summary of gene congruence analysis
| Gene | No. incongruence genes by SH test* | Random trees† |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1 ( | 8 ( |
|
| 6 ( | 76 ( |
|
| 6 ( | 8 ( |
|
| 1 ( | 1 ( |
|
| 2 ( | 0 ( |
|
| 6 ( | 3 ( |
|
| 3 ( | 1 ( |
*Number of incongruent genes at the p<0.05 level based on a Shimodaira-Hasegawa (SH) test of tree topologies. The incongruent genes are in parentheses. †Number of random tree topologies out of 100 random trees that are better fit to the gene tree from the most incongruent multilocus sequence typing (MLST) gene. The most incongruent MLST gene is given in parentheses.
Figure 4Global distribution of complex-17 isolates. Red circles indicate cities where complex-17 isolates were recovered. Numbers indicate epidemiologic sources: 1, animal isolates; 2, human community surveillance isolates; 3, surveillance (feces) isolates from hospitalized patients; 4, human clinical isolates; 5, isolates from documented hospital outbreaks. Numbers of isolates are indicated in parentheses.