OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) can be associated with serious bacteraemia. The focus of this study was to characterize the molecular epidemiology of VRE from bacteraemia cases that were isolated from 1999 to 2009 as part of Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) surveillance activities. METHODS: From 1999 to 2009, enterococci were collected from across Canada in accordance with the CNISP VRE surveillance protocol. MICs were determined using broth microdilution. PCR was used to identify vanA, B, C, D, E, G and L genes. Genetic relatedness was examined using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). RESULTS: A total of 128 cases of bacteraemia were reported to CNISP from 1999 to 2009. In 2007, a significant increase in bacteraemia rates was observed in western and central Canada. Eighty-one of the 128 bacteraemia isolates were received for further characterization and were identified as Enterococcus faecium. The majority of isolates were from western Canada (60.5%), followed by central (37.0%) and eastern (2.5%) Canada. Susceptibilities were as follows: daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and chloramphenicol, 100%; quinupristin/dalfopristin, 96.3%; high-level gentamicin, 71.6%; tetracycline, 50.6%; high-level streptomycin, 44.4%; rifampicin, 21.0%; nitrofurantoin, 11.1%; clindamycin, 8.6%; ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, 1.2%; and ampicillin, 0.0%. vanA contributed to vancomycin resistance in 90.1% of isolates and vanB in 9.9%. A total of 17 sequence types (STs) were observed. Beginning in 2006 there was a shift in ST from ST16, ST17, ST154 and ST80 to ST18, ST412, ST203 and ST584. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in bacteraemia observed since 2007 in western and central Canada appears to coincide with the shift of MLST STs. All VRE isolates remained susceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol and tigecycline.
OBJECTIVES:Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) can be associated with serious bacteraemia. The focus of this study was to characterize the molecular epidemiology of VRE from bacteraemia cases that were isolated from 1999 to 2009 as part of Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP) surveillance activities. METHODS: From 1999 to 2009, enterococci were collected from across Canada in accordance with the CNISP VRE surveillance protocol. MICs were determined using broth microdilution. PCR was used to identify vanA, B, C, D, E, G and L genes. Genetic relatedness was examined using multilocus sequence typing (MLST). RESULTS: A total of 128 cases of bacteraemia were reported to CNISP from 1999 to 2009. In 2007, a significant increase in bacteraemia rates was observed in western and central Canada. Eighty-one of the 128 bacteraemia isolates were received for further characterization and were identified as Enterococcus faecium. The majority of isolates were from western Canada (60.5%), followed by central (37.0%) and eastern (2.5%) Canada. Susceptibilities were as follows: daptomycin, linezolid, tigecycline and chloramphenicol, 100%; quinupristin/dalfopristin, 96.3%; high-level gentamicin, 71.6%; tetracycline, 50.6%; high-level streptomycin, 44.4%; rifampicin, 21.0%; nitrofurantoin, 11.1%; clindamycin, 8.6%; ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, 1.2%; and ampicillin, 0.0%. vanA contributed to vancomycin resistance in 90.1% of isolates and vanB in 9.9%. A total of 17 sequence types (STs) were observed. Beginning in 2006 there was a shift in ST from ST16, ST17, ST154 and ST80 to ST18, ST412, ST203 and ST584. CONCLUSIONS: The increase in bacteraemia observed since 2007 in western and central Canada appears to coincide with the shift of MLST STs. All VRE isolates remained susceptible to daptomycin, linezolid, chloramphenicol and tigecycline.
Entities:
Keywords:
CC17; E. faecium; MLST; vanA; vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
Authors: Thamara M Wijesuriya; Peta Perry; Todd Pryce; John Boehm; Ian Kay; James Flexman; Geoffrey W Coombs; Paul R Ingram Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: P J Simner; H Adam; M Baxter; M McCracken; G Golding; J A Karlowsky; K Nichol; P Lagacé-Wiens; M W Gilmour; D J Hoban; G G Zhanel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2015-04-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kevin J Downes; Andrea Hahn; Jason Wiles; Joshua D Courter; Alexander A Vinks Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Lynn El Haddad; Blake M Hanson; Cesar A Arias; Shashank S Ghantoji; Cynthia P Harb; Mark Stibich; Roy F Chemaly Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-12-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Geoffrey Taylor; Denise Gravel; Lynora Saxinger; Kathryn Bush; Kimberley Simmonds; Anne Matlow; Joanne Embree; Nicole Le Saux; Lynn Johnston; Kathryn N Suh; John Embil; Elizabeth Henderson; Michael John; Virginia Roth; Alice Wong Journal: Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.471
Authors: Christina Forstner; Magda Diab-Elschahawi; Danijel Kivaranovic; Wolfgang Graninger; Dieter Mitteregger; Maria Macher; Thomas Wrba; Elisabeth Presterl Journal: Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Date: 2015-06-15 Impact factor: 4.887