| Literature DB >> 29282057 |
Arnold Donkor Forkuo1, Charles Ansah2, Kwesi Boadu Mensah2, Kofi Annan2, Ben Gyan3, Anjo Theron4, Dalu Mancama4, Colin W Wright5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Discovery of novel gametocytocidal molecules is a major pharmacological strategy in the elimination and eradication of malaria. The high patronage of the aqueous root extract of the popular West African anti-malarial plant Cryptolepis sanguinolenta (Periplocaceae) in traditional and hospital settings in Ghana has directed this study investigating the gametocytocidal activity of the plant and its major alkaloid, cryptolepine. This study also investigates the anti-malarial interaction of cryptolepine with standard anti-malarials, as the search for new anti-malarial combinations continues.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-malarial drug combinations; Cryptolepine; Cryptolepis sanguinolenta; Gametocytocidal; Malaria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29282057 PMCID: PMC5745596 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-2142-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Structure of anti-malarial agents used in the interaction assay. a Mefloquine, b amodiaquine, c chloroquine, d lumefantrine, e crytolepine hydrochloride
Fig. 2Gametocyte viability of CPS and CPE. Gametocytocidal activity of CPS (a), CPE (b) and DHA (c) against late stage gametocytes. Bars represent mean gametocyte activity at each compound concentration (with standard deviation [SD])
In vitro anti-malarial activity against asexual blood stages
| Drugs | Mean IC50 ± S.E.M (nM) |
|---|---|
| Amodiaquine | 12.63 ± 1.66 |
| Mefloquine | 12.98 ± 0.47 |
| Lumefantrine | 10.80 ± 0.97 |
| Chloroquine | 11.05 ± 1.79 |
| Cryptolepine | 603.82 ± 75.57 |
IC50 values of cryptolepine, lumefantrine, mefloquine, and chloroquine against Plasmodium falciparum strain 3D7 are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean of the results of at least three independent assays
In vitro interaction of cryptolepine combinations against 3D7 P. falciparum strains
| Drug combination | ΣFIC50 | Mean ΣFIC50 | Interaction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4:1 | 3:2 | 2:3 | 1:4 | |||
| Cryptolepine + amodiaquine | 0.640 ± 0.08 | 0.0234 ± 0.11 | 0.0631 ± 0.07 | 0.421 ± 0.12 | 0.287 ± 0.10 | Synergism |
| Cryptolepine + mefloquine | 3.015 ± 0.91 | 3.013 ± 1.01 | 5.106 ± 1.13 | 5.595 ± 0.91 | 4.182 ± 0.99 | Antagonism |
| Cryptolepine + lumefantrine | 2.1108 ± 0.17 | 1.6865 ± 0.01 | 0.1475 ± 0.02 | 0.1245 ± 0.04 | 1.017 ± 0.06 | Additivity |
| Cryptolepine + chloroquine | 1.95 ± 0.21 | 1.775 ± 0.36 | 1.66 ± 0.04 | 0.475 ± 0.05 | 1.465 ± 0.17 | Additivity |
The ratios 4:1, 3:2, 2:3 and 1:4 refer to fixed dosage ratios for drug A (cryptolepine) to drug B (amodiaquine, mefloquine, lumefantrine, chloroquine). Values are the means from ≥ 3 experiments
Fig. 3Effects of combinations of cryptolepine with standard anti-malarial drugs on Plasmodium falciparum growth in vitro (3D7 strain). Isobolograms illustrating the effect of combinations of cryptolepine with amodiaquine (a), mefloquine (b), and chloroquine (c). The interaction between cryptolepine and amodiaquine, mefloquine, chloroquine or lumefantrine against ring stage parasites was determined using the SYBR Green I fluorescence-based drug sensitivity assay with the fixed ratio method. Each combination was set up in triplicate for 48 h. The FIC50 concentrations were used for plotting the isobologram