| Literature DB >> 29281672 |
Lieze Oscar Rouffaer1, Diederik Strubbe2, Aimeric Teyssier2,3, Noraine Salleh Hudin2,4, Anne-Marie Van den Abeele5, Ivo Cox5, Roel Haesendonck1, Michel Delmée6, Freddy Haesebrouck1, Frank Pasmans1, Luc Lens2, An Martel1.
Abstract
Urbanization strongly affects biodiversity, altering natural communities and often leading to a reduced species richness. Yet, despite its increasingly recognized importance, how urbanization impacts on the health of individual animals, wildlife populations and on disease ecology remains poorly understood. To test whether, and how, urbanization-driven ecosystem alterations influence pathogen dynamics and avian health, we use house sparrows (Passer domesticus) and Yersinia spp. (pathogenic for passerines) as a case study. Sparrows are granivorous urban exploiters, whose western European populations have declined over the past decades, especially in highly urbanized areas. We sampled 329 house sparrows originating from 36 populations along an urbanization gradient across Flanders (Belgium), and used isolation combined with 'matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization- time of flight mass spectrometry' (MALDI-TOF MS) and PCR methods for detecting the presence of different Yersinia species. Yersinia spp. were recovered from 57.43% of the sampled house sparrows, of which 4.06%, 53.30% and 69.54% were identified as Y. pseudotuberculosis, Y. enterocolitica and other Yersinia species, respectively. Presence of Yersinia was related to the degree of urbanization, average daily temperatures and the community of granivorous birds present at sparrow capture locations. Body condition of suburban house sparrows was found to be higher compared to urban and rural house sparrows, but no relationships between sparrows' body condition and presence of Yersinia spp. were found. We conclude that two determinants of pathogen infection dynamics, body condition and pathogen occurrence, vary along an urbanization gradient, potentially mediating the impact of urbanization on avian health.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29281672 PMCID: PMC5744950 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189509
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1House sparrow populations clustered around the cities of Ghent, Antwerp and Leuven.
Best models using AIC-based model selection for Y. pseudotuberculosis, Y. enterocolitica, other Yersinia species and Scaled Mass Index as respective response variables.
| Response variable: explanatory variables | Log(L) | AIC | ΔAIC | weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| -32.21 | 78.76 | 0.00 | 0.64 | |
| -185.47 | 389.50 | 0.00 | 0.42 | |
| -218.75 | 449.75 | 0.00 | 0.60 | |
| -465.15 | 946.74 | 0.00 | 0.55 |
Variable importance after model-averaging in order to explain the presence of Y. pseudotuberculosis, Y. enterocolitica and other Yersinia species and the SMI of the host.
| Other | SMI | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Granivore-index | 0.32 | 0.49 | ||
| Urbanization (landscape level) | 0.16 | |||
| Urbanization (home range level) | 0.38 | 0.48 | ||
| Average temperature | 0.39 | 0.27 | ||
| Scaled Mass Index | 0.26 | 0.30 | 0.35 | NA |
| Sex | 0.44 | 0.26 | 0.44 | 0.38 |
| Time of Capture | NA | NA | NA | |
| NA | NA | NA | 0.26 | |
| NA | NA | NA | 0.39 | |
| Other | NA | NA | NA | 0.38 |
NA (not applicable)
Parameter estimates and standard deviation for response variables: Y. pseudotuberculosis, Y. enterocolitica, other Yersinia species and SMI (shown in Table 1).
| Parameters for | Estimate ± SE |
|---|---|
| Granivore-index | 1.18±0.59 |
| Urbanization landscape (Suburban) | 2.83±1.35 |
| Urbanization landscape (Urban) | 1.95±1.08 |
| Average temperature | -0.68±0.17 |
| Granivore-index | -0.39±0.15 |
| Urbanization home range | -0.32±0.16 |
| Urbanization landscape (Urban) | 0.96±0.48 |
| Urbanization landscape (Rural) | 0.79±0.49 |
| Average temperature | -0.31±0.12 |
| Urbanization home range | -0.21±0.12 |
| Time of capture | 0.06±0.0.3 |
| Urbanization landscape (Urban) | -0.43±0.18 |
| Urbanization landscape (Rural) | -0.27±0.17 |
a Urbanization within 1600m radius is compared to the Rural habitat
b Urbanization within 1600m radius is compared to the Suburban habitat