| Literature DB >> 27293604 |
Olga Milenkaya1, Nicole Weinstein2, Sarah Legge3, Jeffrey R Walters1.
Abstract
Body condition indices are increasingly applied in conservation to assess habitat quality, identify stressed populations before they decline, determine effects of disturbances, and understand mechanisms of declines. To employ condition indices in this manner, we need first to understand their baseline variability and sources of variation. Here, we used crimson finches (Neochmia phaeton), a tropical passerine, to describe the variation in seven commonly used condition indices by sex, age, breeding stage, time of day, and year. We found that packed cell volume, haemoglobin, total plasma protein, and scaled mass were all significantly affected by an interaction between sex and breeding stage. Furcular fat varied by sex and breeding stage and also trended by year, scaled mass showed a positive trend with age and varied by time of day, and haemoglobin additionally varied by year. Pectoral muscle scores varied and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio trended only by year. Year effects might reflect a response to annual variation in environmental conditions; therefore, those indices showing year effects may be especially worthy of further investigation of their potential for conservation applications. Pectoral muscle scores and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio may be particularly useful due to the lack of influence of other variables on them. For the other indices, the large variation that can be attributed to individual covariates, such as sex and breeding stage, suggests that one should not interpret the physiological condition of an individual as measured by these indices from their absolute value. Instead, the condition of an individual should be interpreted relative to conspecifics by sex, breeding stage, and possibly age.Entities:
Keywords: Body condition; Neochmia phaeton; crimson finch; habitat quality; haematocrit; heterophil to lymphocyte ratio
Year: 2013 PMID: 27293604 PMCID: PMC4806621 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/cot020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Conserv Physiol ISSN: 2051-1434 Impact factor: 3.079
Examples of body condition indices being applied in conservation, including those that reflect resource (e.g. food) acquisition and allocation, such as body mass and measures of fat reserves, as well as haematological, biochemical, and endocrine indices that assess other aspects of physiological condition
| Conservation application | Condition index | Species | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Assessing habitat quality | Corticosterone | American redstart ( | |
| Fat score, mass, stored fat, haematocrit, H/L ratio, WBC counts, non-estrified fatty acids, glucose, glycerol, uric acid, β-hydroxybutyrate, and triglycerides | Southwestern willow flycatcher ( | ||
| Assessing habitat requirements | H/L ratio | Eastern yellow robin ( | |
| Assessing nutritional requirements | Mass, WBC counts, packed cell volume, total plasma protein, serum calcium, albumin, serum phosphorus, uric acid, creatine kinase, and aspartate aminotrasferase | Greater sage grouse ( | |
| Assessing effects of habitat fragmentation | Corticosterone and mass adjusted for structural body size | Eurasian treecreeper ( | |
| Haematocrit | Bats: | ||
| Haemoglobin, haematocrit, N/L ratio, WBC counts, mean red blood cell volume, mean cell haemoglobin content, mean cell haemoglobin concentration, and red blood cell distribution width | Agile antechinus ( | ||
| Corticosterone and mass adjusted for structural body size | Common toad ( | ||
| Assessing effects of ecotourism | Haematocrit, leucocrit, total serum protein, WBC differentials, and total antioxidant capacity to total oxidative status ratio | Southern stingray ( | |
| Corticosterone | Magellanic penguin ( | ||
| Corticosterone and mass adjusted for structural body size | Yellow-eyed penguin ( | ||
| Assessing stress due to logging activity | Corticosterone | Northern spotted owl ( | |
| Assessing effects of oiling on wildlife | Haemoglobin | River otter ( |
For a review of body condition indices used in conservation broadly, see Stevenson and Woods (2006), and for reviews of the use of body condition indices to assess habitat quality in particular, see Johnson (2007), Ellis , and Homyack (2010). Abbreviations: H/L ratio, heterophil to lymphocyte ratio; N/L ratio, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; and WBC, white blood cell.
Scoring criteria for furcular fat and pectoral muscle
| Score | Furcular fat | Muscle |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No fat observed | No pectoralis observed |
| 1 | Fills <33% of furculum | Keel is very prominent, with minimal pectoralis |
| 2 | Fills 34–66% of furculum | Pectoralis is clear, but does not exceed the keel |
| 3 | Fills 67–99% of furculum | Pectoralis exceeds keel |
| 4 | Fat is flush with furculum | – |
The distribution of observed values for each condition index among crimson finches, including the mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, and sample size (n)
| Condition index | Mean | SD | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packed cell volume (%) | 48.5 | 2.92 | 40 | 58 | 322 |
| Haemoglobin (g/l) | 174.4 | 12.81 | 142 | 224 | 335 |
| Total plasma protein (g/dl) | 4.93 | 0.62 | 3.25 | 7.2 | 186 |
| Heterophil to lymphocyte ratio | 0.835 | 0.96 | 0.10 | 8.9 | 149 |
| Scaled mass (g) | 9.96 | 0.72 | 7.67 | 12.16 | 362 |
| Muscle score | 2.09 | 0.54 | 0.5 | 3 | 362 |
| Fat score | 2.06 | 0.93 | 0 | 4 | 362 |
Pairwise correlations between condition indices, including the correlation coefficient, the sample size in parentheses, and asterisks indicating significance after Bonferroni correction for the Pearson's correlations (**P < 0.001 and ***P < 0.0001)
| Packed cell volume | Haemoglobin | Total plasma protein | Scaled mass | Log(H/L ratio) | Muscle score | Fat score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packed cell volume | 1 | 0.74 (310)*** | −0.18 (185) | −0.07 (320) | −0.02 (144) | −0.01 (317) | −0.08 (317) |
| Haemoglobin | – | 1 | −0.10 (178) | −0.09 (331) | −0.02 (144) | −0.12 (335) | −0.14 (335) |
| Total plasma protein | – | – | 1 | 0.25 (186)** | −0.02 (144) | 0.08 (185) | 0.34 (185) |
| Scaled mass | – | – | – | 1 | 0.00 (149) | 0.11 (356) | 0.34 (356) |
| Log(H/L ratio) | – | – | – | – | 1 | −0.10 (149) | −0.01 (149) |
| Muscle score | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 0.18 (362) |
| Fat score | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
Correlations between a continuous variable [packed cell volume, haemoglobin, total plasma protein, scaled mass, and log(H/L ratio)] and either muscle score or fat score are polyserial correlations, the correlation between muscle score and fat score is a polychoral correlation, and neither are tested for significance.
The variation of each condition index by sex, year, age, breeding stage, sex by breeding stage interaction, and time of day, including the sample size (n) and r[2] for each model, and the degrees of freedom (d.f.), F-ratio (F) and P-value, with an asterisk denoting significance after Bonferroni correction for each covariate in the model
| Condition index covariates | d.f. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Packed cell volume (%) | 268 | 0.70 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 4.06 | 0.05 | ||
| Year | 3 | 1.88 | 0.13 | ||
| Age | 4 | 1.37 | 0.25 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 7.63 | <0.0001* | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 4.98 | 0.0002* | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 0.96 | 0.33 | ||
| Haemoglobin (g/l) | 273 | 0.70 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 2.84 | 0.09 | ||
| Year | 3 | 7.13 | 0.0001* | ||
| Age | 4 | 0.94 | 0.44 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 4.91 | 0.0003* | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 5.39 | 0.0001* | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 1.23 | 0.27 | ||
| Total plasma protein (g/dl) | 187 | 0.71 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 18.35 | <0.0001* | ||
| Year | 1 | 0.93 | 0.34 | ||
| Age | 4 | 1.70 | 0.15 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 12.40 | <0.0001* | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 9.75 | <0.0001* | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 0.22 | 0.64 | ||
| Log(H/L ratio) | 146 | 0.61 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 1.71 | 0.19 | ||
| Year | 1 | 9.86 | 0.002 | ||
| Age | 4 | 0.95 | 0.44 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 1.50 | 0.20 | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 0.58 | 0.72 | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 1.03 | 0.31 | ||
| Scaled mass (g) | 310 | 0.67 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 0.76 | 0.38 | ||
| Year | 3 | 1.56 | 0.20 | ||
| Age | 4 | 2.49 | 0.04 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 13.14 | <0.0001* | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 14.38 | <0.0001* | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 12.16 | 0.0006* | ||
| Muscle score | 320 | 0.55 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 4.58 | 0.03 | ||
| Year | 3 | 26.93 | <0.0001* | ||
| Age | 4 | 0.58 | 0.68 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 3.06 | 0.01 | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 2.75 | 0.02 | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 0.88 | 0.35 | ||
| Fat score | 318 | 0.29 | |||
| Sex | 1 | 29.10 | <0.0001* | ||
| Year | 3 | 4.96 | 0.002 | ||
| Age | 4 | 0.58 | 0.68 | ||
| Stage | 5 | 9.35 | <0.0001* | ||
| Sex × stage | 5 | 2.78 | 0.02 | ||
| Time of day | 1 | 2.87 | 0.09 |
Figure 1:The variation in condition indices among crimson finches by sex and breeding stage. Least-squares means (±SEM) of each condition index by sex and breeding stage, including packed cell volume (A), haemoglobin (B), total plasma protein (C), scaled mass (D), muscle score (E), fat score (F), and heterophil to lymphocyte ratio (H/L ratio; G). Sample sizes are given within each bar.
Figure 2:The variation in scaled mass among crimson finches by age. Least-squares means (±SEM) of scaled mass (in grams) by age. Scaled mass trended positively with age, but the variable age was no longer significant in the model after Bonferroni correction. Sample sizes are given within each bar. Other condition indices did not vary significantly by age and are not illustrated here.
Figure 3:Annual variation in haemoglobin, muscle, H/L ratio, and fat score among crimson finches. Least-squares means (±SEM) of haemoglobin (A), muscle score (B), H/L ratio (C), and fat score (D) by year. We include the H/L ratio and fat score here because they trended with year (both P-values = 0.002) even though these trends were not significant after Bonferroni correction. The H/L ratio values (C) were back transformed from a base e log to a linear scale. Sample sizes are given within each bar. Other condition indices did not significantly vary by year and are not illustrated here.