Literature DB >> 28403184

Low prevalence of human enteropathogenic Yersinia spp. in brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) in Flanders.

Lieze Oscar Rouffaer1, Kristof Baert2, Anne-Marie Van den Abeele3, Ivo Cox3, Gerty Vanantwerpen4, Lieven De Zutter4, Diederik Strubbe5, Katleen Vranckx6, Luc Lens7, Freddy Haesebrouck1, Michel Delmée8, Frank Pasmans1, An Martel1.   

Abstract

Brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) have been identified as potential carriers of Yersinia enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis, the etiological agents of yersiniosis, the third most reported bacterial zoonosis in Europe. Enteropathogenic Yersinia spp. are most often isolated from rats during yersiniosis cases in animals and humans, and from rats inhabiting farms and slaughterhouses. Information is however lacking regarding the extent to which rats act as carriers of these Yersinia spp.. In 2013, 1088 brown rats across Flanders, Belgium, were tested for the presence of Yersinia species by isolation method. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS, PCR on chromosomal- and plasmid-borne virulence genes, biotyping and serotyping. Yersinia spp. were isolated from 38.4% of the rats. Of these, 53.4% were designated Y. enterocolitica, 0.7% Y. pseudotuberculosis and 49.0% other Yersinia species. Two Y. enterocolitica possessing the virF-, ail- and ystA-gene were isolated. Additionally, the ystB-gene was identified in 94.1% of the other Y. enterocolitica isolates, suggestive for biotype 1A. Three of these latter isolates simultaneously possessed the ail-virulence gene. Significantly more Y. enterocolitica were isolated during winter and spring compared to summer. Based on our findings we can conclude that brown rats are frequent carriers for various Yersinia spp., including Y. pseudotuberculosis and (human pathogenic) Y. enterocolitica which are more often isolated during winter and spring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28403184      PMCID: PMC5389835          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Yersiniosis was the third most commonly reported bacterial zoonotic disease in Europe in 2013, causing illness in 1.92 out of 100 000 inhabitants [1]. The etiologic agents are human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica biotype (BT) 1B and 2–5, which possess chromosomally encoded virulence genes and carry the pYV (plasmid for Yersinia virulence), and to a minor extent Y. pseudotuberculosis [1;2]. Y. enterocolitica BT1A is most commonly regarded as non-pathogenic and often possesses the chromosomally encoded ystB-gene [3]. Wildlife has increasingly been recognized as reservoir and/or vector for various zoonotic diseases [4]. Especially rodents, such as the brown rat (Rattus norvegicus), have been appointed as potential carriers of pathogenic Yersinia spp.. Since brown rats are considered synanthropic rodents [5] they can be a possible source of infection for humans and other animals [6-9]. To evaluate food safety and human health risks, most of the studies on prevalence and epidemiology of Yersinia spp. in small mammals have therefore been conducted during yersiniosis outbreaks in animals and humans, in urban areas, in the surroundings of (pig) farms and in slaughterhouses [8-12]. Although epidemiologically important, information is lacking regarding the extent to which rats represent a potential reservoir of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis. In this study we assessed the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in brown rats across Flanders, Belgium, not specifically related to disease outbreaks or to cities, with the aim to evaluate the contribution of brown rats as carriers of these Yersinia spp..

Materials and methods

Within the framework of a rodenticide resistance study conducted by the Research Institute for Nature and Forest (INBO), in 2013, a total of 1088 brown rats were caught across Flanders, Belgium, by certified pest control operators of the Flanders Environment Agency (VMM) using wire mesh live traps measuring 50 length x 15 width x 13 height (cm). Most brown rats were captured on public land and occasionally on private land when oral permission was granted by the respective land owners. The brown rats were humanely killed by a percussive blow on the head (Directive 2010/63/EU; Annex IV) in the context of the pest control as stated by the Belgian legislation concerning animal protection and welfare (KB 14/08/86 art.15). According to the same legislation (KB 14/08/86 art.3.15) the killing of animals, only for the use of their organs and tissues, is not considered as an animal experiment. Therefore an approval of an ethical committee, as foreseen by the Belgian legislation concerning the protection of laboratory animals (KB 29/05/13), was not required. The brown rat is considered a major pest species which is legally controlled, for the trapping and killing of the rats no legal permits were required. Most individuals (71%) were captured in rural areas. The capture occasions were predominantly during the spring period (76.8%), while 18.1% of the rats were caught during summer, 2.7% during fall and 2.5% during winter. Capture dates were missing for 37 rats. All the trapped individuals were kept frozen (-20°C) until April 2014, after which 0.5g of colon content was collected for the isolation of Yersinia spp.. Cold (4°C) enrichment was performed for three weeks using a 1/10 dilution of colon content in Phosphate Buffered Saline supplemented with 0.5% Peptone, 1% Mannitol and 0.15% Bile Salts (PMB). Before plating out onto cefsulodinirgasan-novobiocin (CIN)-agar (Bio-rad, UK), an alkali treatment was performed using a 1/10 dilution of PMB-sample in KOH-solution (0.25%KOH, 0.75%NaCl) which was vortexed for 20 seconds. The CIN plates were incubated for 24 hours at 30°C, and reassessed after being kept at room temperature for 24 hours. Suspicious colonies were purified onto MacConkey agar (Oxoid, Hampshire, UK). MALDI-TOF MS (Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization- Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry), was performed using the Bruker Daltonik MALDI Biotyper, at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, Laboratory Medicine, AZ Sint-Lucas in Ghent. The samples were cultured for 24 hours at 30°C on Columbia agar with sheep blood (Oxoid, Wesel, Germany). One colony per sample was smeared upon a MALDI steel target plate, covered with 1 μl α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA) matrix and, after air drying, loaded into the MALDI-Biotyper. Mass Spectrometry detections were carried out with Maldi biotyper 3.0 RTC software in standard IVD settings, using the 5627 reference strains library. Every MALDI-TOF assigned-Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis was tested for the presence of chromosomal- (ail, inv, ystA, ystB) and pYV-plasmid-borne (virF) virulence genes [2]. Positive controls, Y. enterocolitica BT1A (FAVV208), human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3 (75.55b), and Y. pseudotuberculosis (22.36a), were provided by the Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety of Ghent University. When Y. enterocolitica harboured the ystB-gene in combination with the ail-gene, the latter was sequenced and analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [13]. Ail-positive Y. enterocolitica isolates were bioserotyped and Y. pseudotuberculosis isolates were serotyped at the National Reference Center Yersinia (IREC) and at the Department of Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety of Ghent University. The MALDI-TOF profiles were compared against the biotypes with linear discriminant analysis (LDA) to try to identify discriminating peaks [14]. To test whether Y. enterocolitica prevalence differed between seasons, we applied a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) with Y. enterocolitica presence or absence as binary dependent variable and season as independent predictor variable, using a binomial error distribution. To account for possible spatial autocorrelation in Y. enterocolitica prevalence, latitude and longitude of capture locations were forced into the model as fixed effects, fixed predictor variables [15]. To test for differences in prevalence between seasons, contrasts were set up using the general linear hypothesis test (glht)- function of the R library ‘multcomp’ (multiple comparisons), resulting in Bonferroni-corrected p-values adjusted for multiple testing [16]. All analyses were conducted in R [17].

Results and discussion

In Flanders, Yersinia spp. were isolated from 418 out of 1088 (38.4%) brown rats tested (Fig 1), which, in 13 individuals, harbored more than one Yersinia spp.. Of these Yersinia spp., 53.4% (223/418) were designated Y. enterocolitica, 0.7% (3/418) Y. pseudotuberculosis, and 49.0% (205/418) (Table 1) other Yersinia species.
Fig 1

Distribution of capture locations of brown rats across Flanders over different seasons.

Table 1

Total number of rats testing positive for Yersinia, in the respective seasons.

SpringSummerFallWinterTotal number of Yersinia isolates
Y. enterocolitica196a12b27217*
Y. pseudotuberculosis30003
Yersinia species1632565199*
Total number of brown rats examined8071902826

a Including Y. enterocolitica BT 3/O:1,2,3 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A

b Including Y. enterocolitica BT 2/O:5,27 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A

* Dates of 37 brown rats were missing, six of which were identified as Y. enterocolitica (incl. one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A) and six environmental Yersinia spp..

a Including Y. enterocolitica BT 3/O:1,2,3 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A b Including Y. enterocolitica BT 2/O:5,27 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A * Dates of 37 brown rats were missing, six of which were identified as Y. enterocolitica (incl. one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A) and six environmental Yersinia spp.. MALDI-TOF MS and PCR on the combination of chromosomal- and plasmid-borne virulence genes have previously been used for the identification of (enteropathogenic) Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis [2;18–23]. Although MALDI-TOF MS has proven to accurately perform species specific identification of Yersinia spp. [19;21], the sensitivity and specificity of the technique highly depends on the validation of the reference library used to identify the different species [19;24]. Since only Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis were accurately validated in the Bruker Daltonik MALDI Biotyper at the Department of Clinical Microbiology, resulting in high specificity and sensitivity [21;24], only these species will be further discussed. The results of the MALDI-TOF MS-identification of the Yersinia species other than Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis have been provided within the supporting information (S1 Table), although these results have to be interpreted with caution due to the lack of validation of the MALDI-TOF reference database for the other Yersinia spp. [19;24]. Due to the psychrotolerant nature of Yersinia spp., the observed prevalence could be expected to vary among seasons [25]. Indeed, our study found a significantly higher prevalence of Y. enterocolitica in brown rats during winter (26.9%) and spring (24.3%) months, compared to summer (6.3%) (P-values = 0.007 and <0.001 respectively) (Table 2). This observation is in line with previous studies in rodents and other animals [6;11;26;27], although a high prevalence of Y. enterocolitica during the summer has also been reported in rats [10].
Table 2

Seasonal comparisons of Y. enterocolitica prevalence.

EstimateStd. Errorz valuePr(>|z|)
spring—fall = = 01.43060.75711.8900.20901
summer—fall = = 0-0.17050.8005-0.2130.99611
winter—fall = = 01.62110.88831.8250.23658
summer—spring = = 0-1.60110.3164-5.060< 0.001
winter—spring = = 00.19050.45610.4180.97220
winter—summer = = 01.79160.55193.2460.00535

Tukey’s post-hoc tests for multiple contrasts were used to establish Bonferroni-corrected significant differences in Y. enterocolitica prevalence between seasons. Results show that compared to the summer period, Y. enterocolitica prevalence was higher in the spring and in the winter. Prevalence did not significantly differ between other season comparisons.

Tukey’s post-hoc tests for multiple contrasts were used to establish Bonferroni-corrected significant differences in Y. enterocolitica prevalence between seasons. Results show that compared to the summer period, Y. enterocolitica prevalence was higher in the spring and in the winter. Prevalence did not significantly differ between other season comparisons. The prevalence of Y. enterocolitica (20.5% = 223/1088) in brown rats is similar to other studies in rodents [28]. In the vast majority (93.3% = 208/223), the presence of the ystB-gene was demonstrated, which has been inferred to be restricted to BT1A [2;18;29]. Of these ystB positive isolates, three possessed an additional ail-virulence gene (100% identity with Accession number: FR847859.1). Controversy exists about the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica BT1A. Since most BT1A strains do not possess the typical virulence plasmid pYV, lack the chromosomal virulence genes such as the ail-gene and are often isolated from the environment [3;22], BT1A has been regarded as non-pathogenic. However, the increasing isolation of this biotype from clinical cases draws more attention to BT1A [3;22]. Although rare, the presence of the ail-gene has previously been demonstrated in BT1A isolates [20;27]. The presence of the enterotoxin-gene ystB in combination with the ail-virulence gene could be an indication that these BT1A strains possess virulent characteristics [30]. However, potential loss of gene function, related to horizontal gene transfer cannot be ruled out [20]. The high genotypic diversity of BT1A makes the classification in clinical and non-clinical isolates more problematic since other, yet unknown, virulence factors could be contributing to the observed virulence in some strains [3;22;31]. Although the majority of Y. enterocolitica belonged to the supposedly non-pathogenic BT1A, two human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica (bioserotype 2/O:5,27 and 3/O:1,2,3) [1;32], possessing the virF-, ail- and ystA-gene virulence gene, were isolated from rats living in the proximity of livestock farms. These results are in line with other studies, indicating that Y. enterocolitica BT1A is widespread in rodents, but human pathogenic bioserotypes are rather rare [27;28;33]. The recovery of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica from rodents could be related to the presence of farmhouses, as was hypothesized for bioserotype 4/O:3 and 3/O:3, for which the presence in rodents is presumed to be related to pig farms and pig slaughterhouses [9;10;23;27]. Despite the isolation of the two human pathogenic bioserotypes in the proximity of livestock farms, no definitive conclusion can be made from this observation, since the animals on the respective farms were not tested for the presence of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. Furthermore, bioserotype 2/O:5,27 has been isolated from a variety of animals, such as cattle, pigs, hares and wild boars, and no primary reservoir has been identified yet [34;35]. Bioserotype 3/O:1,2,3, alternatively called the “chinchilla-type” [36], has also previously been isolated from pigs [37]. No peaks discriminating between the different biotypes could be identified in the MALDI-TOF spectra (data not shown). Three (0.3%) Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype I possessing the inv- and virF-virulence gene, the most frequently isolated Y. pseudotuberculosis in Europe, were isolated. This serotype has been reported to cause disease in humans and other animals, such as birds and rats [12;38–40]. The low percentage of Y. pseudotuberculosis observed in our study is in line with the absence or sporadic detection of Y. pseudotuberculosis in rodents in other studies [8;9;27;28]. Although a large number of brown rats was screened for the presence of enteropathogenic Yersinia spp. in Flanders, the additional investigation of other wild living animals, as potential carriers or reservoirs for enteropathogenic Yersinia, could substantially improve our knowledge on the epidemiology and ecology of these pathogens and the potential risk these animals pose on farm-animals and human health. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that rats are frequent carriers for Yersinia spp. such as non-pathogenic and human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis.

MALDI-TOF results of Yersinia spp. other than Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis.

(DOCX) Click here for additional data file.
  31 in total

1.  The novel heat-stable enterotoxin subtype gene (ystB) of Yersinia enterocolitica: nucleotide sequence and distribution of the yst genes.

Authors:  T Ramamurthy; K i Yoshino; X Huang; G Balakrish Nair; E Carniel; T Maruyama; H Fukushima; T Takeda
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Survival of Yersinia enterocolitica in soil and water.

Authors:  K Tashiro; Y Kubokura; Y Kato; K Kaneko; M Ogawa
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Piseth Seng; Michel Drancourt; Frédérique Gouriet; Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Jean Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China.

Authors:  Junrong Liang; Ran Duan; Shengli Xia; Qiong Hao; Jinchuan Yang; Yuchun Xiao; Haiyan Qiu; Guoxiang Shi; Shukun Wang; Wenpeng Gu; Chunxiang Wang; Mingliu Wang; Kecheng Tian; Longze Luo; Meng Yang; Huaiyu Tian; Jiazheng Wang; Huaiqi Jing; Xin Wang
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  PCR detection of virulence genes in Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and investigation of virulence gene distribution.

Authors:  P Thoerner; C I Bin Kingombe; K Bögli-Stuber; B Bissig-Choisat; T M Wassenaar; J Frey; T Jemmi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Isolation of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica 1B/O:8 from Apodemus mice in Japan.

Authors:  Shinya Oda; Hidenori Kabeya; Shingo Sato; Ai Shimonagane; Kai Inoue; Hideki Hayashidani; Nobuhiro Takada; Hiromi Fujita; Hiroki Kawabata; Soichi Maruyama
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.535

7.  Production of Yersinia stable toxin (YST) and distribution of yst genes in biotype 1A strains of Yersinia enterocolitica.

Authors:  Itender Singh; Jugsharan S Virdi
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Occurrence of Yersinia enterocolitica in house rats.

Authors:  K I Kaneko; S Hamada; Y Kasai; E Kato
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Smouldering epidemic of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in barn rats.

Authors:  K I Kaneko; S Hamada; Y Kasai; N Hashimoto
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Yersinia enterocolitica serovar 1,2a,3 biovar 3 in chinchillas.

Authors:  H H Wuthe; S Aleksić
Journal:  Zentralbl Bakteriol       Date:  1992-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Prevalence and Diversity in Wild Boars in Northeast Germany.

Authors:  Marie Reinhardt; Jens Andre Hammerl; Katharina Kunz; Andrea Barac; Karsten Nöckler; Stefan Hertwig
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Effects of urbanization on host-pathogen interactions, using Yersinia in house sparrows as a model.

Authors:  Lieze Oscar Rouffaer; Diederik Strubbe; Aimeric Teyssier; Noraine Salleh Hudin; Anne-Marie Van den Abeele; Ivo Cox; Roel Haesendonck; Michel Delmée; Freddy Haesebrouck; Frank Pasmans; Luc Lens; An Martel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Rats as potential reservoirs for neglected zoonotic Bartonella species in Flanders, Belgium.

Authors:  Maria Krügel; Martin Pfeffer; Nina Król; Christian Imholt; Kristof Baert; Rainer G Ulrich; Anna Obiegala
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.