| Literature DB >> 28403184 |
Lieze Oscar Rouffaer1, Kristof Baert2, Anne-Marie Van den Abeele3, Ivo Cox3, Gerty Vanantwerpen4, Lieven De Zutter4, Diederik Strubbe5, Katleen Vranckx6, Luc Lens7, Freddy Haesebrouck1, Michel Delmée8, Frank Pasmans1, An Martel1.
Abstract
Brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) have been identified as potential carriers of Yersinia enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis, the etiological agents of yersiniosis, the third most reported bacterial zoonosis in Europe. Enteropathogenic Yersinia spp. are most often isolated from rats during yersiniosis cases in animals and humans, and from rats inhabiting farms and slaughterhouses. Information is however lacking regarding the extent to which rats act as carriers of these Yersinia spp.. In 2013, 1088 brown rats across Flanders, Belgium, were tested for the presence of Yersinia species by isolation method. Identification was performed using MALDI-TOF MS, PCR on chromosomal- and plasmid-borne virulence genes, biotyping and serotyping. Yersinia spp. were isolated from 38.4% of the rats. Of these, 53.4% were designated Y. enterocolitica, 0.7% Y. pseudotuberculosis and 49.0% other Yersinia species. Two Y. enterocolitica possessing the virF-, ail- and ystA-gene were isolated. Additionally, the ystB-gene was identified in 94.1% of the other Y. enterocolitica isolates, suggestive for biotype 1A. Three of these latter isolates simultaneously possessed the ail-virulence gene. Significantly more Y. enterocolitica were isolated during winter and spring compared to summer. Based on our findings we can conclude that brown rats are frequent carriers for various Yersinia spp., including Y. pseudotuberculosis and (human pathogenic) Y. enterocolitica which are more often isolated during winter and spring.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28403184 PMCID: PMC5389835 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175648
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Distribution of capture locations of brown rats across Flanders over different seasons.
Total number of rats testing positive for Yersinia, in the respective seasons.
| Spring | Summer | Fall | Winter | Total number of | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 196 | 12 | 2 | 7 | 217 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 163 | 25 | 6 | 5 | 199 | |
| Total number of brown rats examined | 807 | 190 | 28 | 26 |
a Including Y. enterocolitica BT 3/O:1,2,3 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A
b Including Y. enterocolitica BT 2/O:5,27 and one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A
* Dates of 37 brown rats were missing, six of which were identified as Y. enterocolitica (incl. one ail positive Y. enterocolitica BT 1A) and six environmental Yersinia spp..
Seasonal comparisons of Y. enterocolitica prevalence.
| Estimate | Std. Error | z value | Pr(>|z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| spring—fall = = 0 | 1.4306 | 0.7571 | 1.890 | 0.20901 |
| summer—fall = = 0 | -0.1705 | 0.8005 | -0.213 | 0.99611 |
| winter—fall = = 0 | 1.6211 | 0.8883 | 1.825 | 0.23658 |
| summer—spring = = 0 | -1.6011 | 0.3164 | -5.060 | < 0.001 |
| winter—spring = = 0 | 0.1905 | 0.4561 | 0.418 | 0.97220 |
| winter—summer = = 0 | 1.7916 | 0.5519 | 3.246 | 0.00535 |
Tukey’s post-hoc tests for multiple contrasts were used to establish Bonferroni-corrected significant differences in Y. enterocolitica prevalence between seasons. Results show that compared to the summer period, Y. enterocolitica prevalence was higher in the spring and in the winter. Prevalence did not significantly differ between other season comparisons.