Literature DB >> 29278449

Process evaluation improves delivery of a nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme in Burkina Faso.

Jennifer N Nielsen1, Deanna K Olney2, Marcellin Ouedraogo3, Abdoulaye Pedehombga3,4, Hippolyte Rouamba3,5, Fanny Yago-Wienne3.   

Abstract

Evidence is emerging from rigorous evaluations about the effectiveness of nutrition-sensitive agriculture programmes in improving nutritional outcomes. Additional evidence can elucidate how different programme components and pathways contribute and can be optimized for impact. The International Food Policy Research Institute, with Helen Keller International, designed a comprehensive framework to evaluate the delivery, utilization, and impact of Helen Keller International's enhanced homestead food production programme in Burkina Faso. After 18 months of implementation, a process evaluation was conducted to examine programme impact pathways, using key informant and semistructured interviews with implementing agents and beneficiaries, and with residents of control communities. Data were analyzed by International Food Policy Research Institute and reviewed with project managers and partners through multiple workshops to identify opportunities to strengthen implementation. Findings illuminated gaps between intended and actual delivery schemes, including input constraints, knowledge gaps among community agents in agriculture and young child nutrition practices, and lower than expected activity by community volunteers. In response, staff developed measures to overcome water constraints and expand vegetable and poultry production, retrained volunteers in certain techniques of food production and counselling for nutrition behaviour change, added small incentives to motivate volunteers, and shaped both immediate and long-term changes to the programme model. Working closely with International Food Policy Research Institute on the evaluation activities also expanded the repertoire of research methods and skills of Helen Keller International staff. Process evaluation can strengthen programme delivery, utilization, and design. Collaboration between researchers and implementers can improve programme effectiveness, project staff capacity, and advance delivery science.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behaviour change; nutrition-sensitive agriculture; process evaluation; programme theory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29278449      PMCID: PMC6865971          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  32 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation designs for adequacy, plausibility and probability of public health programme performance and impact.

Authors:  J P Habicht; C G Victora; J P Vaughan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Improving results for nutrition: a commentary on an agenda and the need for implementation research.

Authors:  James L Garrett
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  A 2-year integrated agriculture and nutrition and health behavior change communication program targeted to women in Burkina Faso reduces anemia, wasting, and diarrhea in children 3-12.9 months of age at baseline: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deanna K Olney; Abdoulaye Pedehombga; Marie T Ruel; Andrew Dillon
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  The effects of household food production strategies on the health and nutrition outcomes of women and young children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amy Webb Girard; Julie L Self; Corey McAuliffe; Olafunke Olude
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.980

5.  Nutrition-sensitive interventions and programmes: how can they help to accelerate progress in improving maternal and child nutrition?

Authors:  Marie T Ruel; Harold Alderman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Evidence-based interventions for improvement of maternal and child nutrition: what can be done and at what cost?

Authors:  Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jai K Das; Arjumand Rizvi; Michelle F Gaffey; Neff Walker; Susan Horton; Patrick Webb; Anna Lartey; Robert E Black
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  A review of the effectiveness of agriculture interventions in improving nutrition outcomes.

Authors:  Peter R Berti; Julia Krasevec; Sian FitzGerald
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.022

8.  A 2-Year Integrated Agriculture and Nutrition Program Targeted to Mothers of Young Children in Burkina Faso Reduces Underweight among Mothers and Increases Their Empowerment: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Deanna K Olney; Lilia Bliznashka; Abdoulaye Pedehombga; Andrew Dillon; Marie T Ruel; Jessica Heckert
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Assessing implementation fidelity of a community-based infant and young child feeding intervention in Ethiopia identifies delivery challenges that limit reach to communities: a mixed-method process evaluation study.

Authors:  Sunny S Kim; Disha Ali; Andrew Kennedy; Roman Tesfaye; Amare W Tadesse; Teweldebrhan H Abrha; Rahul Rawat; Purnima Menon
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Behaviour Centred Design: towards an applied science of behaviour change.

Authors:  Robert Aunger; Valerie Curtis
Journal:  Health Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-08-18
View more
  10 in total

1.  Process evaluation improves delivery of a nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme in Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Jennifer N Nielsen; Deanna K Olney; Marcellin Ouedraogo; Abdoulaye Pedehombga; Hippolyte Rouamba; Fanny Yago-Wienne
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Are home gardening programs a sustainable way to improve nutrition? Lessons from a cluster-randomized controlled trial in Rufiji, Tanzania.

Authors:  Mia M Blakstad; Dominic Mosha; Lilia Bliznashka; Alexandra L Bellows; Chelsey R Canavan; Mashavu H Yussuf; Killian Mlalama; Isabel Madzorera; Jarvis T Chen; Ramadhani A Noor; Joyce Kinabo; Honorati Masanja; Wafaie W Fawzi
Journal:  Food Policy       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.080

3.  Food and Agricultural Approaches to Reducing Malnutrition (FAARM): protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial to evaluate the impact of a Homestead Food Production programme on undernutrition in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Amanda S Wendt; Thalia M Sparling; Jillian L Waid; Anna A Mueller; Sabine Gabrysch
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Nutrition-sensitive agriculture programme impacts on time use and associations with nutrition outcomes.

Authors:  Mara van den Bold; Lilia Bliznashka; Gayathri Ramani; Deanna Olney; Agnes Quisumbing; Abdoulaye Pedehombga; Marcellin Ouedraogo
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Pathways to Diverse Diets-a Retrospective Analysis of a Participatory Nutrition-Sensitive Project in Kenya.

Authors:  Julia Boedecker; Carl Lachat; Dana Hawwash; Patrick Van Damme; Marisa Nowicki; Céline Termote
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2021-11-26

6.  Qualitative evidence for improved caring, feeding and food production practices after nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions in rural Vietnam.

Authors:  Dai Dinh Nguyen; Sabina Di Prima; Reint Huijzendveld; E Pamela Wright; Dirk Essink; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Agric Food Secur       Date:  2022-04-11

7.  Understanding the effects of nutrition-sensitive agriculture interventions with participatory videos and women's group meetings on maternal and child nutrition in rural Odisha, India: A mixed-methods process evaluation.

Authors:  Audrey Prost; Helen Harris-Fry; Satyanarayan Mohanty; Manoj Parida; Sneha Krishnan; Emily Fivian; Suchitra Rath; Nirmala Nair; Naba K Mishra; Shibanath Padhan; Ronali Pradhan; Satyapriya Sahu; Jolene Skordis; Heather Danton; Peggy Koniz-Booher; Emma Beaumont; Philip James; Elizabeth Allen; Diana Elbourne; Suneetha Kadiyala
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.660

8.  Home-Grown School Feeding: Implementation Lessons From a Pilot in a Poor Ethnic Minority Community in Vietnam.

Authors:  Sabina Di Prima; Dai Nguyen Dinh; Demi D Reurings; E Pamela Wright; Dirk Essink; Jacqueline E W Broerse
Journal:  Food Nutr Bull       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.244

9.  Beneficiary and Local Stakeholder Participation in Community-Based Nutrition Interventions.

Authors:  Rebecca C Robert; Brittany L Feijoo
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-08-29

10.  Fathers and grandmothers experiences participating in nutrition peer dialogue groups in Vihiga County, Kenya.

Authors:  Faith Thuita; Altrena Mukuria; Teresia Muhomah; Kamryn Locklear; Samantha Grounds; Stephanie L Martin
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 3.092

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.