Literature DB >> 29277969

Predicting delayed healing: The diagnostic accuracy of a venous leg ulcer risk assessment tool.

Helen E Edwards1,2,3, Christina N Parker1,2,3, Charne Miller4,5, Michelle Gibb3, Suzanne Kapp6,7, Rajna Ogrin8, Jacinta Anderson9, Kerrie Coleman10, Dianne Smith10, Kathleen J Finlayson1,2,3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate a newly developed tool that can predict the risk of failure to heal of a venous leg ulcer in 24 weeks. The risk assessment tool was validated, and performance of the tool was assessed using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) analysis. Retrospective and prospective validation was conducted through multi-site, longitudinal studies. In the retrospective study (n = 318), 30% of ulcers did not heal within 24 weeks, with the tool demonstrating an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.93, P < .001) for the total score. In the prospective study across 10 clinical sites (n = 225), 31% (n = 68) of ulcers did not heal within 24 weeks. Participants were classified with the RAT at enrolment as being at low risk (27%), moderate risk (53%) or high risk (20%) of delayed healing; the proportion of wounds unhealed at 24 weeks was 6%, 29% and 59%, respectively. Validation results of the total score indicated good discrimination and goodness of fit with an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.71-0.85, P < .001). Validation of this risk assessment tool offers assurance that realistic outcomes can be predicted for patients, and scores can guide early decisions on interventions to address specific risk factors for failing to heal, thus promoting timely healing.
© 2017 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delayed healing; non-healing; risk assessment tool; validation; venous leg ulcer

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29277969      PMCID: PMC7950125          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  26 in total

1.  Which venous leg ulcers will heal with limb compression bandages?

Authors:  D J Margolis; J A Berlin; B L Strom
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Predicting delayed healing: The diagnostic accuracy of a venous leg ulcer risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Helen E Edwards; Christina N Parker; Charne Miller; Michelle Gibb; Suzanne Kapp; Rajna Ogrin; Jacinta Anderson; Kerrie Coleman; Dianne Smith; Kathleen J Finlayson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Venous ulcer healing by four-layer compression bandaging is not influenced by the pattern of venous incompetence.

Authors:  M Guest; J J Smith; M S Sira; P Madden; R M Greenhalgh; A H Davies
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-16

5.  NF-1Score: a prediction score for internal neurofibromas in neurofibromatosis-1.

Authors:  Emilie Sbidian; Pierre Wolkenstein; Laurence Valeyrie-Allanore; Diana Rodriguez; Smail Hadj-Rabia; Salah Ferkal; Jean-Philippe Lacour; Jean-Claude Leonard; Luc Taillandier; Stéphanie Sportich; Philippe Berbis; Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Using an artificial neural network to predict healing times and risk factors for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  R J Taylor; A D Taylor; J V Smyth
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Clinical predictors of leg ulcer healing.

Authors:  C J Moffatt; D C Doherty; R Smithdale; P J Franks
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.302

8.  Design, data analysis and sampling techniques for clinical research.

Authors:  Karthik Suresh; Sanjeev V Thomas; Geetha Suresh
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.383

9.  Health service pathways for patients with chronic leg ulcers: identifying effective pathways for facilitation of evidence based wound care.

Authors:  Helen Edwards; Kathleen Finlayson; Mary Courtney; Nick Graves; Michelle Gibb; Christina Parker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 10.  A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients' quality of life.

Authors:  Oliver R Herber; Wilfried Schnepp; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  4 in total

1.  Predicting delayed healing: The diagnostic accuracy of a venous leg ulcer risk assessment tool.

Authors:  Helen E Edwards; Christina N Parker; Charne Miller; Michelle Gibb; Suzanne Kapp; Rajna Ogrin; Jacinta Anderson; Kerrie Coleman; Dianne Smith; Kathleen J Finlayson
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Potential prognostic factors for delayed healing of common, non-traumatic skin ulcers: A scoping review.

Authors:  David A Jenkins; Sundus Mohamed; Joanne K Taylor; Niels Peek; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Venous leg ulcers treated with fish collagen gel in a 12-week randomized single-centre study.

Authors:  Justyna Cwajda-Białasik; Paulina Mościcka; Maria T Szewczyk; Dorota Hojan-Jezierska; Weronika Kawałkiewicz; Anna Majewska; Marta Janus-Kubiak; Leszek Kubisz; Arkadiusz Jawieñ
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 1.664

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.