Literature DB >> 31903300

The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Caroline E Fife1, Susan D Horn2,3.   

Abstract

Objective: To develop a venous leg ulcer (VLU) risk stratification system for use in research and clinical practice. Approach: U.S. Wound Registry data were examined retrospectively and assigned an outcome. Bivariate analysis identified significant variables (p < 0.05) that were used to create a multivariable logistic regression model. Ulcers with data for wound area at the first visit before debridement were included in regression analysis, which was based on a 90% development sample. The model was validated on a hold-out 10% data sample.
Results: The original dataset included 26,713 VLUs, of which 11,773 ulcers were eligible for preliminary analysis and 10,942 ulcers were eligible for regression analysis. The 90% development model included 9,898 ulcers, of which 7,498 healed (75.8%). The 10% validation sample included 1,044 ulcers, of which 809 healed (77.5%). The following variables significantly predicted healing: number of concurrent wounds of any etiology, wound size, wound age (in days), evidence of bioburden/infection, being nonambulatory, and hospitalization for any reason. Innovation: The VLU Wound Healing Index (WHI) is a comprehensive, validated risk stratification model for predicting VLU healing that incorporates patient- and wound-specific variables. Conclusions: The WHI can identify which VLUs most likely require adjunctive therapies to heal, prioritize referral to venous experts, risk-stratify ulcers to create more generalizable clinical trials and understand the impact of clinical interventions. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services accepts this method for reporting VLU outcome under the Quality Payment Program. Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  predictive factors of healing; quality reporting; risk stratification; venous leg ulcers; wound healing index

Year:  2019        PMID: 31903300      PMCID: PMC6940587          DOI: 10.1089/wound.2019.1038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2162-1918            Impact factor:   4.730


  37 in total

Review 1.  Improving accuracy of wound measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Madeleine Flanagan
Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.629

2.  Mathematical modeling in wound healing, bone regeneration and tissue engineering.

Authors:  Liesbet Geris; Alf Gerisch; Richard C Schugart
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 1.774

3.  The Ulcerated Leg Severity Assessment score for prediction of venous leg ulcer healing.

Authors:  S R Kulkarni; M S Gohel; C Wakely; J Minor; K R Poskitt; M R Whyman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux.

Authors:  Misaki M Kiguchi; Eric S Hager; Daniel G Winger; Stanley A Hirsch; Rabih A Chaer; Ellen D Dillavou
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  The use of proteases as prognostic markers for the healing of venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  R Hoffman; J Noble; M Eagle
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.072

6.  Ulcer area reduction at 2 weeks predicts failure to heal by 24 weeks in the venous leg ulcers of patients living alone.

Authors:  C N Parker; K J Finlayson; H E Edwards
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.072

7.  Use of ulcer size and initial responses to treatment to predict the healing time of leg ulcers.

Authors:  S Prince; S R Dodds
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.072

8.  Risk factors related to the failure of venous leg ulcers to heal with compression treatment.

Authors:  Dragan J Milic; Sasa S Zivic; Dragan C Bogdanovic; Nevena D Karanovic; Zoran V Golubovic
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Early healing rates and wound area measurements are reliable predictors of later complete wound closure.

Authors:  Matthew Cardinal; David E Eisenbud; Tania Phillips; Keith Harding
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  Nonlinear modeling of venous leg ulcer healing rates.

Authors:  Matthew Cardinal; Tania Phillips; David E Eisenbud; Keith Harding; Jonathan Mansbridge; David G Armstrong
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2009-03-31
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Wound Care for Venous Ulceration.

Authors:  Sarah E Schroeppel DeBacker; Julie C Bulman; Jeffrey L Weinstein
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.780

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.