Literature DB >> 29276437

Continuous Suture Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement Shortens Cross-Clamp and Bypass Times.

Tadashi Kitamura, James Edwards, Kagami Miyaji.   

Abstract

The interrupted noneverting mattress suture technique is typically used in conventional surgical aortic valve replacement. The continuous suture technique, although faster, has been associated with a higher incidence of paravalvular leak. Using a slightly modified technique to minimize this risk, we investigated whether continuous suturing would shorten aortic cross-clamp time in aortic valve replacement in comparison with interrupted suturing. We reviewed the cases and compared the perioperative data of 60 consecutive patients in Japan and Australia (35 men and 25 women; median age, 70 yr) who had undergone aortic valve replacement with or without septal myectomy. The continuous suture technique had been used in 41 patients (Group CS) and the standard interrupted suture technique in 19 (Group IS). The groups were similar in age, sex, pathologic valvular conditions, and operative urgency. In Group CS, aortic cross-clamp time (47 vs 63 min; P=0.0001) and cardiopulmonary bypass time (76 vs 89 min; P=0.04) were significantly shorter. Neither group had early paravalvular leak. Using our continuous suture technique safely shortened aortic cross-clamp time during surgical aortic valve replacement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve/surgery; cardiac surgical procedures/methods; heart valve prosthesis implantation/adverse effects/instrumentation/methods; operative time; postoperative complications; retrospective studies; risk factors; suture techniques; time factors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29276437      PMCID: PMC5737149          DOI: 10.14503/THIJ-16-5886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  9 in total

1.  Simplified techniques of valve replacement.

Authors:  D A Cooley
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Effect of valve suture technique on incidence of paraprosthetic regurgitation and 10-year survival.

Authors:  Sukumaran K Nair; Gauraang Bhatnagar; Oswaldo Valencia; Venkatachalam Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Aortic stenosis in the elderly: disease prevalence and number of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and modeling study.

Authors:  Ruben L J Osnabrugge; Darren Mylotte; Stuart J Head; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Corinne M LeReun; Ad J J C Bogers; Nicolo Piazza; A Pieter Kappetein
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement in 1,141 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and less than high risk.

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Martin Heimeshoff; Peter Bramlage; Tanja Herbinger; Alexander Würth; Lothar Pilz; Jan S Schymik; Rainer Wondraschek; Tim Süselbeck; Jan Gerhardus; Armin Luik; Bernd-Dieter Gonska; Panagiotis Tzamalis; Herbert Posival; Claus Schmitt; Holger Schröfel
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Treating the patients in the 'grey-zone' with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Claudio Muneretto; Gianluigi Bisleri; Annalisa Moggi; Lorenzo Di Bacco; Maurizio Tespili; Alberto Repossini; Manfredo Rambaldini
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-10-15

6.  Sutureless prostheses and less invasive aortic valve replacement: just an issue of clamping time?

Authors:  Marco Vola; Salvatore Campisi; Antoine Gerbay; Jean-François Fuzellier; Iness Ayari; Jean-Pierre Favre; Michael Faure; Jerôme Morel; Amedeo Anselmi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  A need for speed? Bypass time and outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery.

Authors:  John Chalmers; Mark Pullan; Neeraj Mediratta; Michael Poullis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 8.  Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2014 : Annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Munetaka Masuda; Meinoshin Okumura; Yuichiro Doki; Shunsuke Endo; Yasutaka Hirata; Junjiro Kobayashi; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Noboru Motomura; Hiroshi Nishida; Yoshikatsu Saiki; Aya Saito; Hideyuki Shimizu; Fumihiro Tanaka; Kazuo Tanemoto; Yasushi Toh; Hiroyuki Tsukihara; Shinji Wakui; Hiroyasu Yokomise
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-11

9.  Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery in Japan during 2013: Annual report by The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Munetaka Masuda; Hiroyuki Kuwano; Meinoshin Okumura; Hirokuni Arai; Shunsuke Endo; Yuichiro Doki; Junjiro Kobayashi; Noboru Motomura; Hiroshi Nishida; Yoshikatsu Saiki; Fumihiro Tanaka; Kazuo Tanemoto; Yasushi Toh; Hiroyasu Yokomise
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12
  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Continuous Suture Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement: Technical Considerations and Controversies.

Authors:  Sotiris C Stamou; Ellie A Moeller; Marcos A Nores
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-01-28

2.  Continuous Suture Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Mi Kyung Lee; Jong Bum Choi; Nan Yeol Kim
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2018-04-07

3.  An ex vivo evaluation of two different suture techniques for the Ozaki aortic neocuspidization procedure.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Saisho; Michael Scharfschwerdt; Tim Schaller; Jan Christian Reil; Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Anas Aboud
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

4.  Partial upper sternotomy for aortic valve replacement provides similar mid-term outcomes as the full sternotomy.

Authors:  Tomas Holubec; Petr Kacer; Jan Hlavicka; David Janda; Petr Budera; Petr Tousek; Marek Maly; Richard Fojt; Hana Linkova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.895

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.