Literature DB >> 24722513

A need for speed? Bypass time and outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery.

John Chalmers1, Mark Pullan1, Neeraj Mediratta1, Michael Poullis2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine in the modern era if cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time has a significant effect on postoperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery.
METHODS: Analysis of a prospectively collected cardiac surgery database was performed. Uni- and multivariate analysis on the need of resternotomy for bleeding, mediastinal blood loss, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, hospital length of stay, in-hospital mortality and long- term survival was performed. Only patients with a cross-clamp time <90 min were analysed to exclude technical issues confounding the results.
RESULTS: A total of 1863 isolated first-time AVR procedures were analysed, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 2.4%. The rate of long-term follow-up achieved was 100%. Univariate analysis revealed that CPB time (minutes) had no significant effect on resternotomy (P = 0.5), creatinine kinase muscle-brain isoenzyme (CKMB) release (P = 0.8) and long-term survival (P = 0.06), but was significantly associated with mediastinal blood loss (P = 0.01), ICU length of stay (P = 0.02), hospital length of stay (P = 0.03) and in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified that bypass time (min) was a significant factor associated with mediastinal blood loss (P < 0.001), ICU length of stay (P = 0.01), postoperative length of stay (P < 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.04, P = 0.01), but not long-term survival. Multivariate analysis identified that era of surgery had no significant effect on CKMB release (P = 0.2), mediastinal blood loss (P = 0.4) and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.9), but the latter era of this study was significantly associated with a reduced postoperative length of stay (P < 0.001), reduced ICU length of stay (P < 0.001), reduced need for resternotomy for bleeding (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.94, P = 0.02) and improved long-term survival (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.96, P = 0.02). Adjusting for era made no difference with respect to the above study findings.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements over time with regard to morbidity, mortality and long-term survival, CPB time remains a significant factor determining mediastinal blood loss, ICU and hospital length of stay, and in-hospital mortality.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; Cardiopulmonary bypass; Mortality; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24722513     DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivu102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN: 1569-9285


  15 in total

Review 1.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

2.  Continuous Suture Technique for Aortic Valve Replacement Shortens Cross-Clamp and Bypass Times.

Authors:  Tadashi Kitamura; James Edwards; Kagami Miyaji
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2017-12-19

3.  Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for AKI after Cardiac Surgery.

Authors:  Norberto Perico; Federica Casiraghi; Giuseppe Remuzzi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  Sutureless valve and rapid deployment valves: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Campbell D Flynn; Michael L Williams; Adam Chakos; Lucy Hirst; Benjamin Muston; David H Tian
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

5.  Using machine learning to predict perfusionists' critical decision-making during cardiac surgery.

Authors:  R D Dias; M A Zenati; G Rance; Rithy Srey; D Arney; L Chen; R Paleja; L R Kennedy-Metz; M Gombolay
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 6.  Advances in the management of severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  K E O'Sullivan; S Bargenda; D Sugrue; J Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: short-term efficacy of sutureless compared with stented bioprostheses.

Authors:  Domenico Paparella; Giuseppe Santarpino; Marco Moscarelli; Pietro Guida; Adriano De Santis; Khalil Fattouch; Luigi Martinelli; Roberto Coppola; Elisa Mikus; Alberto Albertini; Mauro Del Giglio; Renato Gregorini; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

8.  Effect of aortic cross-clamp time on late survival after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ben M Swinkels; Jurriën M Ten Berg; Johannes C Kelder; Freddy E Vermeulen; Wim Jan Van Boven; Bas A de Mol
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-22

9.  Early Outcomes of Sutureless Aortic Valves.

Authors:  Muhammet Onur Hanedan; İlker Mataracı; Mehmet Ali Yürük; Tanıl Özer; Ufuk Sayar; Ali Kemal Arslan; Uğur Ziyrek; Murat Yücel
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-05

10.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures.

Authors:  Alina Zubarevich; Marcin Szczechowicz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Anja Osswald; Jef Van den Eynde; Arian Arjomandi Rad; Robert Vardanyan; Daniel Wendt; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Alexander Weymann
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.