Literature DB >> 26998304

Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2,996 breast cancer patients.

L I Ma1, Yueping Liu2, Jianxin Wang1, Yuan Chang1, Long Yu1, Cuizhi Geng1.   

Abstract

Totally implantable venous access port systems (TIVAPS) are widely used in breast cancer patients. However, complications are frequent and may necessitate device replacement or removal, resulting in additional patient stress and treatment delays. The aim of this study was to investigate possible risk factors for complications. A total of 2,996 consecutive female breast cancer patients, with a median age of 50.2 years (range, 21.2-85.5 years) were enrolled in this observational, single-centre study between December, 2008 and April, 2014. TIVAPS implantation was principally performed using local anaesthesia and the blind puncture or Seldinger technique through internal jugular or subclavian vein access. A retrospective chart review was conducted to obtain information associated with TIVAPS and patient data. Insertion performed by blind puncture and Seldinger technique had a success ratio of 96.34 and 99.80%, respectively (χ2=29.905, P<0.001). However, the success ratio of the puncture technique group was 99.76% when the TIVAPS was implanted in the right internal jugular vein. The most common complications were late complications, with an overall incidence rate of 5.41% (162/2,996) during the entire device duration. The most common late complications included fibrin formation (1.84%, 55/2,996), port-related bacteraemia (1.44%, 43/2,996) and deep vein thrombosis (0.63%, 19/2,996). No patient died during the study. Our results demonstrated that insertion of TIVAPS by blind puncture or the Seldinger technique through internal jugular or subclavian vein access is convenient, and insertion by the Seldinger technique through the right internal jugular vein is the preferred method. Therefore, TIVAPS is safe for continuous infusional chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer patients; complications; observational study; totally implantable venous access port systems

Year:  2016        PMID: 26998304      PMCID: PMC4774414          DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2049-9450


  27 in total

1.  Totally implantable venous access port systems and risk factors for complications: a one-year prospective study in a cancer centre.

Authors:  F Narducci; M Jean-Laurent; L Boulanger; S El Bédoui; Y Mallet; J L Houpeau; A Hamdani; N Penel; C Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  S Vescia; A K Baumgärtner; V R Jacobs; M Kiechle-Bahat; A Rody; S Loibl; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Cost-effectiveness of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Authors:  D L Veenstra; S Saint; S D Sullivan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Long-term central venous catheter use and risk of infection in older adults with cancer.

Authors:  Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Kent A Sepkowitz; Elena B Elkin; Laura C Pinheiro; Camelia S Sima; Crystal H Son; Coral L Atoria; Peter B Bach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Possible role of capillary action in pathogenesis of experimental catheter-associated dermal tunnel infections.

Authors:  G L Cooper; A L Schiller; C C Hopkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.

Authors:  R Biffi; F de Braud; F Orsi; S Pozzi; S Mauri; A Goldhirsch; F Nolè; B Andreoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Longterm central venous access in gynecologic cancer patients.

Authors:  V A Minassian; A K Sood; P Lowe; J I Sorosky; A S Al-Jurf; R E Buller
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer.

Authors:  J S Groeger; A B Lucas; H T Thaler; H Friedlander-Klar; A E Brown; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Management of complications related to central venous catheters in cancer patients: an update.

Authors:  Birgit Linnemann
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.180

10.  Sources and outcome of bloodstream infections in cancer patients: the role of central venous catheters.

Authors:  I Raad; R Hachem; H Hanna; P Bahna; I Chatzinikolaou; X Fang; Y Jiang; R F Chemaly; K Rolston
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  8 in total

1.  Totally Implantable Central Venous Port Catheters: Radiation Exposure as a Function of Puncture Site and Operator Experience.

Authors:  Martin Jonczyk; Bernhard Gebauer; Roman Rotzinger; Dirk Schnapauff; Bernd Hamm; Federico Collettini
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Complications and Management of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Ports in Cancer Patients at a University Hospital in Oman.

Authors:  Philomena C D'Souza; Shiyam Kumar; Annupam Kakaria; Rashid Al-Sukaiti; Khalid Al-Baimani; Rana S Hamid; Alok K Mittal; Muna Al-Balushi; Ikram A Burney; Mansour S Al-Moundhri
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-03-15

3.  Complications and management strategies of totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein.

Authors:  Yusuf Velioğlu; Ahmet Yüksel; Emrah Sınmaz
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

Review 4.  Dosage of heparin for patency of the totally implanted central venous catheter in cancer patients.

Authors:  Francisca Jane Gomes de Oliveira; Andrea Bezerra Rodrigues; Islane Costa Ramos; Joselany Áfio Caetano
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-06-19

5.  Surgical Removal of a Calcified Right Atrial Mass Related to Venous Access Port: A Case Report.

Authors:  Joseph G Brungardt; Anup K Kasi; Jeffrey B Kramer
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-31

6.  Perioperative and Postoperative Complications of Supraclavicular, Ultrasound-Guided, Totally Implantable Venous Access Port via the Brachiocephalic Vein in Adult Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Zepeng Yu; Xingwei Sun; Xuming Bai; Wei Ding; WeiDong Wang; Liang Xu; Wenming Qin; Ling Wen; Yong Jin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  A Five-Year Data Report of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Focusing on Early Complications.

Authors:  Harald Lenz; Kirsti Myre; Tomas Draegni; Elizabeth Dorph
Journal:  Anesthesiol Res Pract       Date:  2019-12-10

Review 8.  Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Elena Schembari; Emanuele Gaspare Fontana; Salomone Di Saverio; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.