| Literature DB >> 29271892 |
Di Wang1,2,3, Haiyang Xu4, Shengke Yang5,6, Wenke Wang7,8, Yanhua Wang9,10.
Abstract
To elucidate the adsorption property and the mechanism of plant residues to reduce oxytetracycline (OTC), the adsorption of OTC onto raw willow roots (WR-R), stems (WS-R), leaves (WL-R), and adsorption onto desugared willow roots (WR-D), stems (WS-D), and leaves (WL-D) were investigated. The structural characterization was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectra, and an elemental analyzer. OTC adsorption onto the different tissues of willow residues was compared and correlated with their structures. The adsorption kinetics of OTC onto willow residues was found to follow the pseudo-first-order model. The isothermal adsorption process of OTC onto the different tissues of willow residues followed the Langmuir and Freundlich model and the process was also a spontaneous endothermic reaction, which was mainly physical adsorption. After the willow residues were desugared, the polarity decreased and the aromaticity increased, which explained why the adsorption amounts of the desugared willow residues were higher than those of the unmodified residues. These observations suggest that the raw and modified willow residues have great potential as adsorbents to remove organic pollutants.Entities:
Keywords: PPCPs; adsorption; oxytetracycline; willow residues
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29271892 PMCID: PMC5800108 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15010008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Effect of contact time for oxytetracycline (OTC) adsorption onto willow residues.
Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order rate constants for OTC adsorption onto willow residues.
| Samples | Qe,exp | Pseudo-First-Order Model | Pseudo-Second-Order Model | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | k1 | Qe,cal | R2 | k2 | Qe,cal | ||
| (mg/kg) | (1/h) | (mg/kg) | (kg/mg·h) | (mg/kg) | |||
| Raw willow roots (WR-R) | 464.32 | 0.9740 | 0.2409 | 467.42 | 0.9700 | 0.0008 | 486.91 |
| Desugared willow roots (WR-D) | 1745.84 | 0.9853 | 0.7649 | 1727.43 | 0.9819 | 0.0007 | 1793.56 |
| Raw willow stems (WS-R) | 376.58 | 0.9564 | 0.5317 | 374.62 | 0.9098 | 0.0024 | 388.55 |
| Desugared willow stems (WS-D) | 1302.04 | 0.9591 | 0.7166 | 1289.20 | 0.9483 | 0.0009 | 1337.26 |
| Raw willow leaves (WL-R) | 342.69 | 0.9686 | 0.2909 | 344.65 | 0.9362 | 0.0012 | 370.24 |
| Desugared willow leaves (WL-D) | 1175.11 | 0.9881 | 0.3368 | 1163.17 | 0.9436 | 0.0004 | 1283.42 |
Isotherm parameters for OTC adsorption onto willow residues.
| Samples | Langmuir Model | Freundlich Model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qm | KL | R2 | RL | KF | n | R2 | |
| (mg/kg) | (L/mg) | (mg/kg) (L/mg)1/n | |||||
| WR-R | 20,223.57 | 0.0027 | 0.9912 | (0.93, 0.99) | 56.43 | 1.03 | 0.9906 |
| WR-D | 21,932.29 | 0.0116 | 0.9844 | (0.74, 0.95) | 301.81 | 1.15 | 0.9796 |
| WS-R | 5936.72 | 0.0087 | 0.9624 | (0.79, 0.96) | 21.04 | 1.10 | 0.9544 |
| WS-D | 12,188.92 | 0.0146 | 0.9967 | (0.70, 0.93) | 233.00 | 1.23 | 0.9965 |
| WL-R | 8216.63 | 0.0055 | 0.9687 | (0.86, 0.97) | 16.17 | 1.06 | 0.9657 |
| WL-D | 9780.79 | 0.0186 | 0.9961 | (0.64, 0.91) | 196.98 | 1.15 | 0.9689 |
Isotherm parameters for OTC adsorption onto willow residues at different temperatures.
| Samples | T/K | ΔG/kJ·mol−1 | ΔH/kJ·mol−1 | ΔS/J·mol−1·K−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR-R | 298 | −10.28 | 37.49 | 160.29 |
| 308 | −11.88 | |||
| 318 | −13.48 | |||
| WR-D | 298 | −14.35 | 39.18 | 179.63 |
| 308 | −16.15 | |||
| 318 | −17.94 | |||
| WS-R | 298 | −10.21 | 33.05 | 145.18 |
| 308 | −11.67 | |||
| 318 | −13.12 | |||
| WS-D | 298 | −11.76 | 31.68 | 145.76 |
| 308 | −13.21 | |||
| 318 | −14.67 | |||
| WL-R | 298 | −9.51 | 38.36 | 160.63 |
| 308 | −10.91 | |||
| 318 | −12.72 | |||
| WL-D | 298 | −11.95 | 20.47 | 108.79 |
| 308 | −13.04 | |||
| 318 | −14.13 |
Figure 2SEM images of the raw and desugared willow residues.
Figure 3FTIR spectra of the raw and desugared willow residues.
Elemental analysis, atomic ratios, and sugar content of willow residues.
| Samples | Sugar (%) | N (%) | C (%) | H (%) | O (%) | H/C | (N + O)/C | O/C | Kd (L/kg) | Koc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WR-R | 40.45 | 0.43 | 43.47 | 5.97 | 46.80 | 1.65 | 0.82 | 0.81 | (49.42, 55.01) | 119.46 |
| WR-D | - | 0.16 | 50.53 | 5.86 | 43.83 | 1.39 | 0.65 | 0.65 | (196.42, 234.10) | 432.91 |
| WS-R | 48.67 | 0.64 | 45.76 | 6.14 | 44.32 | 1.61 | 0.74 | 0.73 | (38.88, 49.38) | 95.15 |
| WS-D | - | 0.33 | 55.61 | 6.31 | 38.25 | 1.36 | 0.52 | 0.52 | (129.36, 176.84) | 272.09 |
| WL-R | 61.11 | 1.68 | 42.28 | 5.99 | 41.36 | 1.70 | 0.77 | 0.73 | (37.66, 46.20) | 94.39 |
| WL-D | - | 1.05 | 58.61 | 6.60 | 33.38 | 1.35 | 0.44 | 0.43 | (124.34, 153.59) | 234.04 |
Figure 4Relationship between the aromaticity index (H/C) and log Koc of willow residues in accelerated decay process.