| Literature DB >> 30314375 |
Min Zhou1,2, Tao Zhu3, Xiaohua Fei4.
Abstract
The performance of oxytetracycline adsorption by untreated reed roots, stems and leaves, as well as the desugared reed roots, stems and leaves, was investigated with scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, elemental analysis and surface area analysis to understand the adsorption mechanism. The results showed that the adsorption capacities of untreated reed were 416.35 mg/kg for roots, 341.92 mg/kg for stems and 280.21 mg/kg for leaves, and can be increased significantly by a factor of 8⁻12 after desugarization. The pseudo-first-order kinetic model was more suitable for describing the adsorption kinetics of reed residues, and the isothermal adsorption process was fitted well by both the Langmuir and Freundlich models. The thermodynamic process suggested that the adsorption was a spontaneous endothermic reaction, and mainly physical adsorption-dominated. The desugared reed tissues had a larger surface area and smaller pore area, and the aromaticity of reed residues increased; on the other hand, the polarity and hydrophilicity decreased after desugarization, thus revealing the mechanism of enhanced OTC(oxytetracycline) adsorption by desugared reed residues. This study suggests that the reed residues contribute the complex adsorption ability for both inorganic and organic contaminates. Corruption of the reed can enhance the adsorption; thus, protecting the natural reed residue and letting it naturally corrupt, rather than artificially cleaning it up, can effectively promote the adsorption of pollutants in the environment and protect environmental and public health.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; desugarization; oxytetracycline; reed residues
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30314375 PMCID: PMC6210684 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15102229
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The scheme of the experimental setup.
Figure 2The kinetic model of OTC adsorption by reed residues. (a) Pseudo-first-order model; (b) pseudo-second-order model.
Pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order model-fitted parameters for OTC adsorption by reed residue.
| Samples | Qe,exp (mg/kg) | Pseudo-First-Order | Pseudo-Second-Order | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | K1 (1/h) | Qe,cal (mg/kg) | RSS/dof | K2 (kg/mg·h) | R2 | Qe,cal (mg/kg) | RSS/dof | ||
| R-U | 416.35 | 0.9865 | 0.5392 | 416.25 | 26.50 | 0.9847 | 0.0018 | 439.09 | 29.84 |
| R-D | 1525.71 | 0.9515 | 0.6551 | 1512.88 | 359.70 | 0.9514 | 0.0007 | 1578.57 | 360.44 |
| S-U | 341.92 | 0.9855 | 0.1465 | 338.83 | 32.25 | 0.9849 | 0.0006 | 358.22 | 33.47 |
| S-D | 1043.53 | 0.9767 | 0.8094 | 1032.53 | 75.81 | 0.9757 | 0.0012 | 1085.46 | 79.00 |
| L-U | 280.21 | 0.9699 | 0.3671 | 281.25 | 29.13 | 0.9269 | 0.0017 | 306.85 | 39.06 |
| L-D | 671.94 | 0.9421 | 0.4402 | 658.52 | 145.39 | 0.9053 | 0.0010 | 705.78 | 237.96 |
Figure 3The isothermal models of OTC adsorption by reed residues. (a) Langmuir; (b) Freundlich.
The parameters of isotherm models.
| Samples | Qm (mg/kg) | Langmuir | Freundlich | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KL (L/mg) | R2 | RSS/dof | 1/n | R2 | RSS/dof | ||
| R-U | 8238.81 | 0.0069 | 0.9897 | 4717.84 | 0.91 | 0.9892 | 4937.68 |
| R-D | 22,468.68 | 0.0109 | 0.9782 | 146,622.09 | 0.89 | 0.9701 | 201,419.04 |
| S-U | 5374.83 | 0.0078 | 0.9784 | 5565.49 | 0.89 | 0.9768 | 5984.34 |
| S-D | 15,848.97 | 0.0086 | 0.9788 | 52,851.38 | 0.88 | 0.9784 | 53,796.60 |
| L-U | 3573.84 | 0.0095 | 0.9823 | 2867.64 | 0.88 | 0.9782 | 3520.16 |
| L-D | 5013.84 | 0.0202 | 0.9870 | 10,800.92 | 0.76 | 0.9866 | 11,125.39 |
Thermodynamics parameters for OTC adsorption onto reed residues.
| Samples | T/K | ∆G/kJ·mol−1 | ∆H/kJ·mol−1 | ∆S/J·mol−1·K−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-U | 298 | −10.36 | 10.20 | 69.00 |
| 308 | −11.05 | |||
| 318 | −11.74 | |||
| R-D | 298 | −13.74 | 4.23 | 60.30 |
| 308 | −14.34 | |||
| 318 | −14.95 | |||
| S-U | 298 | −9.62 | 24.25 | 113.66 |
| 308 | −10.76 | |||
| 318 | −11.89 | |||
| S-D | 298 | −12.53 | 16.46 | 97.27 |
| 308 | −13.50 | |||
| 318 | −14.46 | |||
| L-U | 298 | −9.47 | 46.97 | 189.38 |
| 308 | −11.36 | |||
| 318 | −13.25 | |||
| L-D | 298 | −11.17 | 39.62 | 170.43 |
| 308 | −12.87 | |||
| 318 | −14.58 |
Figure 4SEM images of the untreated and desugared reed roots before and after OTC adsorption. (a) R-U, (b) R-UOTC, (c) R-D, (d) R-DOTC.
Elemental composition and atomic ratio.
| Samples | C (%) | H (%) | O (%) | H/C | (N + O)/C | O/C | Kd (L/kg) | Koc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-U | 42.46 | 6.06 | 44.59 | 1.71 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 51.63 | 149.95 |
| R-D | 51.49 | 5.46 | 38.28 | 1.27 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 204.66 | 917.52 |
| S-U | 44.93 | 6.12 | 44.88 | 1.63 | 0.76 | 0.75 | 37.88 | 60.43 |
| S-D | 50.96 | 5.91 | 43.43 | 1.39 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 120.87 | 514.95 |
| L-U | 42.13 | 6.10 | 40.43 | 1.74 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 29.66 | 62.95 |
| L-D | 50.15 | 6.26 | 39.18 | 1.50 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 80.58 | 516.13 |
Figure 5FTIR spectra of the reed (a) roots, (b) stems and (c) leaves.
Figure 6Adsorption–desorption isotherm [33].
The surface area, pore area, micropore volume and pore size of the untreated and desugared roots [33].
| Samples | Surface Area (m2/g) | Pore Area (m2/g) | Micropore Volume (cm3/g) | Average Pore Size (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-U | 0.1844 | 2.2274 | 0.0009 | - |
| R-D | 2.6321 | 3.0050 | 0.0013 | 8.8610 |