| Literature DB >> 29271886 |
Pedram Shokouh1,2, Per Bendix Jeppesen3, Kjeld Hermansen4, Natalja P Nørskov5, Christoffer Laustsen6, Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit7, Haiyun Qi8, Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen9, Søren Gregersen10.
Abstract
Since coffee may help to prevent the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS), we aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of a coffee-based supplement on different features of diet-induced MetS. In this study, 24 Sprague Dawley rats were divided into control or nutraceuticals groups to receive a high-fat/high-fructose diet with or without a mixture of caffeic acid (30 mg/day), trigonelline (20 mg/day), and cafestol (1 mg/day) for 12 weeks. An additional 11 rats were assigned to an acute crossover study. In the chronic experiment, nutraceuticals did not alter body weight or glycemic control, but improved fed hyperinsulinemia (mean difference = 30.80 mU/L, p = 0.044) and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (mean difference = 15.29, p = 0.033), and plasma adiponectin levels (mean difference = -0.99 µg/mL, p = 0.048). The impact of nutraceuticals on post-prandial glycemia tended to be more pronounced after acute administration than at the end of the chronic study. Circulating (mean difference = 4.75 U/L, p = 0.014) and intrahepatocellular alanine transaminase activity was assessed by hyperpolarized-13C nuclear magnetic resonance NMR spectroscopy and found to be reduced by coffee nutraceuticals at endpoint. There was also a tendency towards lower liver triglyceride content and histological steatosis score in the intervention group. In conclusion, a mixture of coffee nutraceuticals improved insulin sensitivity and exhibited hepatoprotective effects in a rat model of MetS. Higher dosages with or without caffeine deserve to be studied in the future.Entities:
Keywords: adiponectin; coffee; dietary supplements; hyperpolarized magnetic resonance spectroscopy; metabolic syndrome X; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29271886 PMCID: PMC5793234 DOI: 10.3390/nu10010006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1(A) Body weight of high-fat/high-fructose-fed rats in both study groups; (B) food intake was measured in one day every second week from week 2 to 10, and presented as g/day. No significant difference was found between groups (error bars: standard error of the mean). Nutraceuticals combination consisted of caffeic acid, trigonelline, and cafestol.
Figure 2Insulin and glucose homeostasis indices from the chronic study. (A) The line graph presents mean fasting plasma glucose and the bar graph shows fed plasma glucose measured at mid-study; (B) Fasting and fed plasma insulin levels. HOMA-IR in fed state was calculated from fed glucose and insulin values. Asterisk indicates a significant difference between groups (t-test, p < 0.05); (C) Blood glucose measured by glucometer after a glucose load during an OGTT.
Results of plasma biochemistry tests performed before and after the intervention presented as mean (SEM). Significant p-values in the between-group analysis are in bold.
| Control Group | Nutraceuticals Group | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 12 Weeks | Baseline | 12 Weeks | ||
| | 1.87 (0.08) | 2.00 (0.08) | 2.02 (0.10) | 2.33 (0.16) | 0.428 |
| | 1.42 (0.05) | 1.58 (0.06) | 1.55 (0.07) | 1.83 (0.11) | 0.492 |
| | 0.48 (0.03) | 0.36 (0.03) | 0.47 (0.03) | 0.49 (0.07) | 0.097 |
| | 0.36 (0.02) | 0.42 (0.05) | 0.37 (0.01) | 0.39 (0.04) | 0.675 |
| | 1.01 (0.08) | 0.31 (0.03) | 0.91 (0.05) | 0.31 (0.02) | 0.268 |
| - | 23.08 (0.29) | - | 23.55 (0.55) | 0.451 | |
| - | 4.40 (0.28) | - | 5.39 (0.39) * | ||
| - | 13.65 (1.88) | - | 8.92 (2.46) | 0.139 | |
| 31.20 (0.73) | 27.72 (1.39) | 32.78 (0.71) | 22.97 (1.09) * | ||
| - | 2.00 (0.26) | - | 1.62 (0.17) | 0.223 | |
* Significantly different from the control group (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, NEFAs: non-esterified fatty acids, HbA1C: Glycated hemoglobin, IL1b: interleukin-1, ALT: alanine transaminase
Figure 3Representative histological liver sections (magnification 20×): (A) A sample from the control group with marked fatty change showing mixed small- and large-droplet macrovesicular steatosis; (B) A sample from the nutraceuticals group showing mild large-droplet macrovesicular steatosis.
Figure 4Liver 13C-MR spectroscopy: (A) Average sum spectrum of each group reconstructed from the dynamic spectra covering 120 s time span after the intravenous injection of hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Peaks from left to right are [1-13C]-lactate, -pyruvate hydrate, -alanine, -pyruvate and –bicarbonate; (B) The area under the curve of signal intensity time curves for each metabolite normalized to [1-13C]pyruvate and (C) total carbon; (D) Comparison of liver signal intensity ratios of [1-13C]pyruvate metabolites between groups. Asterisk denotes a significant difference compared to the control group (t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 5Quantitative HPLC-MS/MS data: (A) extracted ion chromatograms of caffeic acid, ferulic acid and internal standard in plasma; (B) plasma levels of total and free caffeic acid and (C) ferulic acid at different time points in both study groups calculated by an external standard calibration method. Error bars represent ± standard error of the mean.
Figure 6Results from the acute cross-over study. (A) Growth chart of the 11 rats used in the acute study; (B) Mean blood glucose levels during the OGTT (started 90 min after receiving a placebo or pellets supplemented with coffee chemicals) are plotted against time on the upper part. Under the line graph is a bar chart that displays its incremental area under the curve in each group; (C) The insulin response measured in plasma every hour after the glucose challenge.
A comparison of intervention dosage and duration of the present study and selected published studies on hydroxycinnamic acids and/or decaffeinated coffee extract. Human equivalent dosage enables the comparison between different species used in different studies. For the present study, the dosage of both caffeic acid and total compounds are presented to facilitate the comparison.
| Model Species | Intervention Duration (Weeks) | Intervention | Dosage (mg/Day) | Human Equivalent Dosage | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present study | Sprague-Dawley rat | 12 | Chemicals combination | 51 | 1428 |
| CA | 30 | 840 | |||
| Song et al., 2014 [ | C57BL/6N mouse | 11 | DCBE | 3 | 507 |
| 9 | 1521 | ||||
| 27 | 4563 | ||||
| CGA | 4.5 | 761 | |||
| Peng et al., 2015 [ | Sprague-Dawley rat | 12 | CGA | 7 | 196 |
| 32 | 896 | ||||
| Mubarak et al., 2013 [ | C57BL6 mouse | 12 | CGA | 0.3 | 51 |
| Li Kwok Cheong et al., 2014 [ | C57BL6 mouse | 12 | DCBE | 15 | 2535 |
| Ho et al., 2012 [ | C57B6SJL mouse | 20 | DCBE | 2.8 | 473 |
| Jia et al., 2014 [ | C57BL/6J mouse | 9 | DCBE | 60 | 10,140 |
| Shearer et al., 2007 [ | Sprague-Dawley rat | 4 | DCBE | 1600 | 44,800 |
Assumptions: human/mouse conversion factor = 169; human/rat conversion factor = 28; high-fat-fed mouse body weight = 35 g; mouse food intake = 3 g/day; Acronyms: CA: caffeic acid; DCBE: decaffeinated coffee bean extract; CGA: chlorogenic acids.