| Literature DB >> 29271382 |
Long-Yang Li1, Xiao-Lin Wu2, Richard J Roman1, Fan Fan1, Chen-Sheng Qiu2, Bo-Hua Chen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is a major cause of disc protrusion, likely to be associated with decrease of water content. This research aimed to evaluate IDD by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with a 7.0 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) machine.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29271382 PMCID: PMC5754960 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.221261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1(a) 7.0T Magnetic resonance imaging and (b) body position in the magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Twenty-eight images were obtained of each imaged layer. (c) The disc (including nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosis) was divided into four quadrants of equal area. (d) Due to uncertainty in differences regarding the distribution of fractional anisotropy values, regions of interests were manually determined from the outer annulus fibrosis, inner annulus fibrosis, and nucleus pulposus areas of each quadrant for the purpose of statistical analysis and image reconstruction.
Intervertebral disc ADC values of rats from A, B, C, and D groups
| Position | Group A (‰) | Group B (‰) | Group C (‰) | Group D (‰) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ID | 1.54 ± 0.08 | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 1.22 ± 0.07 | 1.07 ± 0.07 | 71.67 | <0.01 |
| NP | 1.64 ± 0.05 | 1.56 ± 0.07 | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 1.40 ± 0.07 | 20.02 | <0.01 |
| AF | 1.29 ± 0.14 | 1.10 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 27.01 | <0.01 |
Data were shown as mean ± SD. Group A: 28 days old; Group B: 42 days old; Group C: 56 days old; Group D: 70 days old; ID: Intervertebral disc; NP: Nucleus pulposus; AF: Annulus fibrosis; SD: Standard deviation; ADC: Apparent diffusion coefficient. n=6 in each group.
Nucleus pulposus and annulus fibrosis ADC values of different levels in Group A (n=6)
| Position | L1/L2 (‰) | L2/L3 (‰) | L3/L4 (‰) | L4/L5 (‰) | L5/L6 (‰) | L6/S1 (‰) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NP | 1.63 ± 0.06 | 1.54 ± 0.06 | 1.55 ± 0.05 | 1.52 ± 0.04 | 1.50 ± 0.04 | 1.39 ± 0.04 | 14.99 | <0.01 |
| AF | 1.11 ± 0.18 | 1.14 ± 0.19 | 1.36 ± 0.14 | 1.21 ± 0.13 | 1.14 ± 0.12 | 1.31 ± 0.13 | 3.17 | >0.05 |
Data were shown as mean ± SD. NP: Nucleus pulposus; AF: Annulus fibrosis; SD: Standard deviation; ADC: Apparent diffusion coefficient.
Protein content of L1 intervertebral discs among different age groups
| Target protein | Group A | Group B | Group C | Group D | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggrecan | 1.88 ± 0.16 | 1.59 ± 0.26 | 0.33 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 188.77 | <0.01 |
| Type II collagen | 2.22 ± 0.04 | 1.02 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 6240.78 | <0.01 |
Data were shown as mean ± SD. Group A: 28 days old; Group B: 42 days old; Group C: 56 days old; Group D: 70 days old; SD: Standard deviation. n=6 in each group.
Figure 2(a) Protein expression of L1 intervertebral discs between different age groups. (b) Analysis of aggrecan expression of L1 intervertebral discs among 28-, 42-, 56-, and 70-day groups (*P < 0.05 compared with the 28 days’ group). (c) Analysis of collagen II expression of L1 intervertebral discs among 28-, 42-, 56-, and 70-day-old groups (*P < 0.01 compared with 28-day-old group).
Protein content of L1–L6 intervertebral discs in Group A (n=6)
| Target protein | L1/L2 | L2/L3 | L3/L4 | L4/L5 | L5/L6 | L6/S1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aggrecan | 1.92 ± 0.16 | 1.99 ± 0.17 | 1.96 ± 0.26 | 1.83 ± 0.17 | 1.77 ± 0.09 | 1.89 ± 0.19 | 1.26 | >0.05 |
| Type II collagen | 2.24 ± 0.03 | 2.19 ± 0.05 | 2.23 ± 0.05 | 2.22 ± 0.03 | 2.21 ± 0.03 | 2.20 ± 0.02 | 1.49 | >0.05 |
Data were shown as mean ± SD. SD: Standard deviation.
Figure 3(a) Protein expression of different intervertebral discs in Group A. (b) Analysis of aggrecan expression from L1/L2 to L6/S1 level intervertebral discs in Group A (P > 0.05). (c) Analysis of collagen II expression from L1/L2 to L6/S1 level intervertebral discs in Group A (P > 0.05).