Literature DB >> 29270258

Attending Physician Remote Access of the Electronic Health Record and Implications for Resident Supervision: A Mixed Methods Study.

Shannon K Martin, Kiara Tulla, David O Meltzer, Vineet M Arora, Jeanne M Farnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advances in information technology have increased remote access to the electronic health record (EHR). Concurrently, standards defining appropriate resident supervision have evolved. How often and under what circumstances inpatient attending physicians remotely access the EHR for resident supervision is unknown.
OBJECTIVE: We described a model of attending remote EHR use for resident supervision, and quantified the frequency and magnitude of use.
METHODS: Using a mixed methods approach, general medicine inpatient attendings were surveyed and interviewed about their remote EHR use. Frequency of use and supervisory actions were quantitatively examined via survey. Transcripts from semistructured interviews were analyzed using grounded theory to identify codes and themes.
RESULTS: A total of 83% (59 of 71) of attendings participated. Fifty-seven (97%) reported using the EHR remotely, with 54 (92%) reporting they discovered new clinical information not relayed by residents via remote EHR use. A majority (93%, 55 of 59) reported that this resulted in management changes, and 54% (32 of 59) reported making immediate changes by contacting cross-covering teams. Six major factors around remote EHR use emerged: resident, clinical, educational, personal, technical, and administrative. Attendings described resident and clinical factors as facilitating "backstage" supervision via remote EHR use.
CONCLUSIONS: In our study to assess attending remote EHR use for resident supervision, attendings reported frequent remote use with resulting supervisory actions, describing a previously uncharacterized form of "backstage" oversight supervision. Future work should explore best practices in remote EHR use to provide effective supervision and ultimately improve patient safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29270258      PMCID: PMC5734323          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00847.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  25 in total

1.  The critical incident technique.

Authors:  J C FLANAGAN
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach.

Authors:  Arianne Teherani; Tina Martimianakis; Terese Stenfors-Hayes; Anupma Wadhwa; Lara Varpio
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

3.  Launching HITECH.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Resident uncertainty in clinical decision making and impact on patient care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J M Farnan; J K Johnson; D O Meltzer; H J Humphrey; V M Arora
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2008-04

5.  Resident time spent in clinical and educational activities at home: implications for duty hours.

Authors:  Roderick Corro Deaño; Allison DeKosky; Anoop Appannagari; Jacob Doll; Emily Georgitis; Steven Potts; Vineet Arora
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-06-13

6.  Faculty development in assessment: the missing link in competency-based medical education.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Denham S Ward; Richard K Reznick; Peter J Katsufrakis; Karen M Leslie; Vimla L Patel; Donna D Ray; Elizabeth A Nelson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations.

Authors:  Bridget C O'Brien; Ilene B Harris; Thomas J Beckman; Darcy A Reed; David A Cook
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Exploring entrustment: housestaff autonomy and patient readmission.

Authors:  Shannon K Martin; Jeanne M Farnan; Andrea Flores; Lianne M Kurina; David O Meltzer; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  How Residents Develop Trust in Interns: A Multi-Institutional Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  Leslie Sheu; Patricia S O'Sullivan; Eva M Aagaard; Darlene Tad-Y; Heather E Harrell; Jennifer R Kogan; James Nixon; Harry Hollander; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Clinical oversight: conceptualizing the relationship between supervision and safety.

Authors:  Tara J T Kennedy; Lorelei Lingard; G Ross Baker; Lisa Kitchen; Glenn Regehr
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  3 in total

1.  Physician stress and burnout: the impact of health information technology.

Authors:  Rebekah L Gardner; Emily Cooper; Jacqueline Haskell; Daniel A Harris; Sara Poplau; Philip J Kroth; Mark Linzer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Supervision Is Not Education: The Dark Side of Remote Access to the Electronic Health Record.

Authors:  Matthew A Fuglestad; Paul J Schenarts
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2017-12

3.  Conceptual considerations for using EHR-based activity logs to measure clinician burnout and its effects.

Authors:  Thomas Kannampallil; Joanna Abraham; Sunny S Lou; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.