Literature DB >> 6834402

A defence of medical paternalism: maximising patients' autonomy.

M S Komrad.   

Abstract

All illness represents a state of diminished autonomy and therefore the doctor-patient relationship necessarily and justifiably involves a degree of medical paternalism argues the author, an American medical student. In a broad-ranging paper he discusses the concepts of autonomy and paternalism in the context of the doctor-patient relationship. Given the necessary diminution of autonomy which illness inflicts, a limited form of medical paternalism, aimed at restoring or maximising the patient's autonomy is entirely acceptable, and indeed fundamental to the relationship he argues. However, the exercise of this paternalism should be flexible and related to the current 'level of autonomy' of the patient himself. An editorial in this issue comments briefly on this paper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Philosophical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6834402      PMCID: PMC1060849          DOI: 10.1136/jme.9.1.38

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  9 in total

1.  Paternalistic behavior.

Authors:  Bernard Gert; Charles M Culver
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1976

2.  Cooper v. Roberts: a "reasonable patient" test for informed consent.

Authors:  Patrick Sean Cassidy
Journal:  Univ Pittsbg Law Rev       Date:  1973

3.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  T S SZASZ; M H HOLLENDER
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1956-05

4.  Medical ethics and the hopelessly ill child.

Authors:  A M Waldman
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: the primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1979-03

6.  The breast cancer controversy & its implications for the informed consent doctrine.

Authors:  R B Kraft
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  1980-10

7.  Searching for moral certainty in medicine: a proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

8.  An ethical approach to paternalism in the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  F H Marsh
Journal:  Ethics Sci Med       Date:  1977

9.  Public challenge of physician authority.

Authors:  M R Haug; B Lavin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.983

  9 in total
  17 in total

1.  The question of access.

Authors:  Carol J Cohen; Joseph C d'Oronzio
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  1989

2.  A vote for no confidence.

Authors:  Sarah Jane Warwick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Too soon to give up: re-examining the value of advance directives.

Authors:  Benjamin H Levi; Michael J Green
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  Experimental ethics in sports medicine research.

Authors:  D A Brodie; K Stopani
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Reconceptualising the doctor-patient relationship: recognising the role of trust in contemporary health care.

Authors:  Zara J Bending
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  The autonomy of demented patients: interviews with caregivers.

Authors:  S L Ekman; A Norberg
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper.

Authors:  H Brody
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The battering of informed consent.

Authors:  M Kottow
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Consent for anaesthesia.

Authors:  S M White
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Paternalism and the doctor-patient relationship in general practice.

Authors:  B McKinstry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.