| Literature DB >> 29266667 |
Fenni Rusli1, Mark V Boekschoten1, Vincenzo Borelli2, Chen Sun1, Carolien Lute1, Aswin L Menke3, Joost van den Heuvel4,5, Stefano Salvioli2, Claudio Franceschi2, Michael Müller6, Wilma T Steegenga1.
Abstract
Calorie restriction (CR) is a dietary regimen that supports healthy aging. In this study, we investigated the systemic and liver-specific responses caused by a diet switch to a medium-fat (MF) diet in 24-month-old lifelong, CR-exposed mice. This study aimed to increase the knowledge base on dietary alterations of gerontological relevance. Nine-week-old C57BL/6J mice were exposed either to a control, CR, or MF diet. At the age of 24 months, a subset of mice of the CR group was transferred to ad libitumMF feeding (CR-MF). The mice were sacrificed at the age of 28 months, and then, biochemical and molecular analyses were performed. Our results showed that, despite the long-term exposure to the CR regimen, mice in the CR-MF group displayed hyperphagia, rapid weight gain, and hepatic steatosis. However, no hepatic fibrosis/injury or alteration in CR-improved survival was observed in the diet switch group. The liver transcriptomic profile of CR-MF mice largely shifted to a profile similar to the MF-fed animals but leaving ~22% of the 1,578 differentially regulated genes between the CR and MF diet groups comparable with the expression of the lifelong CR group. Therefore, although the diet switch was performed at an old age, the CR-MF-exposed mice showed plasticity in coping with the challenge of a MF diet without developing severe liver pathologies.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990NAFLDzzm321990; DNA methylation; aging; glycomics; liver; long-term CR; transcriptomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29266667 PMCID: PMC5847878 DOI: 10.1111/acel.12696
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Aging Cell ISSN: 1474-9718 Impact factor: 9.304
Figure 1Physiological changes during the CR‐MF diet switch. (a) Experimental design. (b) Body weight development from 24 to 28 months of age following the diet switch. (c) Food intake measurement at 24, 26, and 28 months. (d) eWAT and liver weight. (e) Principle component analysis of 16 plasma inflammatory cytokines. (f) Kaplan–Meier survival curve, statistical difference was assessed by log‐rank analysis. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001
Figure 2Liver transcriptomic profile of the CR‐MF diet switch largely altered toward the direction of the lifelong MF diet group. (a) Principle component analysis plot for individual animals showing the CR‐MF animals shifted to the cluster of MF diet group. The expression values of all three dietary interventions were normalized to the C group. (b) Analysis scheme for investigating the status of the CR‐differentially expressed genes after CR‐MF diet switch. A smaller proportion of differentially expressed genes remained similar to the expression of the lifelong CR, while most of the genes shifted toward the profile of MF's. (c) The fraction of the CR‐associated and not CR‐associated genes in the top 10 differentially regulated pathways between the lifelong CR and MF diet groups
Upstream regulators of the 354 CR‐associated genes
| Top 10 upstream regulator | Target genes ( |
| Activation | Predicted activation state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACOX1 | 17 | 1.32 × 10−10 | 3.153 | Activated |
| TGFβ1 | 59 | 1.40 × 10−9 | −3.581 | Inhibited |
| AHR | 19 | 1.04 × 10−6 | 2.523 | Activated |
| IL‐1β | 32 | 3.82 × 10−6 | −2.774 | Inhibited |
| COMMD1 | 5 | 1.56 × 10−5 | 2.236 | Activated |
| Alpha‐catenin | 10 | 1.94 × 10−5 | 2.618 | Activated |
| BTNL2 | 8 | 2.61 × 10−5 | −2.121 | Inhibited |
| HIF1α | 16 | 2.04 × 10−4 | −2.140 | Inhibited |
| ERK | 11 | 9.71 × 10−4 | −2.121 | Inhibited |
| CD44 | 9 | 1.06 × 10−3 | −2.449 | Inhibited |
Based on previous knowledge of expected effects between upstream regulators and their target genes in the IPA database, upstream regulator analysis was performed. Top 10 predicted upstream regulators are presented.
Another standard statistical measure in upstream regulator analysis in IPA is activation z‐score. The known effect (activation or inhibition) of an upstream regulator was compared with observed changes in gene expression. Based on the concordance between the two, an activation z‐score was determined, showing whether the predicted upstream regulator was activated (z‐score >2), inhibited (z‐score <−2) or uncertain.
Figure 3The CR‐MF diet switch group demonstrated elevated insulin and IHTG levels, but comparable plasma ALT and liver hydroxyproline compared to the CR group. (a) Fasting plasma insulin level. (b) Plasma ALT. (c) IHTG content. (d) Liver 4‐hydroxyproline content. Statistical difference was determined by one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‐test. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001. (e) Collagen staining on liver sections (original magnification 200×)
Figure 4Plasma N‐glycosylation profile and expression levels of glycosylation modifying genes Fut8, Rpn2, and Uggt1. (a) Plasma levels of three N‐glycans, NGA2F (peak 1), NA2 (peak 5), and NA2F (peak 6) had shifted following the CR‐MF diet switch. Statistical significance was assessed by one‐way ANOVA followed by Tukey post‐test analysis. (b) The expression levels of CR‐associated gene Fut8 in the CR‐MF diet switch group remained similar to those of CR and significantly differed from the expression levels of MF's. (c) Following the diet switch, gene expression levels of Rpn2 and Uggt1 in the CR‐MF group decreased. Statistical difference for the gene expression data was determined by intensity‐based moderated t‐statistic (IBMT) p‐value. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001
Figure 5The gene expression levels of fatty acid uptake‐related genes Cd36, Cav1, and Fabp4 and DNA methylation levels of Cd36. (a) The gene expression levels of CR‐associated gene Cd36. (b) The gene expression levels of Cav1 and Fabp4. Statistical significance of the gene expression data was determined by intensity‐based moderated t‐statistic (IBMT) p‐value. (c) The location of promoter and enhancer region upstream of Cd36. (d) DNA methylation levels of CR, CR‐MF, and MF in the promoter region. (e) DNA methylation levels in the intergenic enhancer region. Differences on methylation levels were analyzed using two‐way ANOVA followed by post hoc Bonferroni test. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001