Literature DB >> 29265882

Survival Forests with R-Squared Splitting Rules.

Hong Wang1, Xiaolin Chen2, Gang Li3.   

Abstract

In modeling censored data, survival forest models are a competitive nonparametric alternative to traditional parametric or semiparametric models when the function forms are possibly misspecified or the underlying assumptions are violated. In this work, we propose a survival forest approach with trees constructed using a novel pseudo R2 splitting rules. By studying the well-known benchmark data sets, we find that the proposed model generally outperforms popular survival models such as random survival forest with different splitting rules, Cox proportional hazard model, and generalized boosted model in terms of C-index metric.

Entities:  

Keywords:  R-squared; censored data; random survival forest; splitting function; time-to-event data

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29265882      PMCID: PMC5905875          DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2017.0107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.549


  16 in total

1.  Bagging survival trees.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Berthold Lausen; Axel Benner; Martin Radespiel-Tröger
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Survival ensembles.

Authors:  Torsten Hothorn; Peter Bühlmann; Sandrine Dudoit; Annette Molinaro; Mark J van der Laan
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Assessing new biomarkers and predictive models for use in clinical practice: a clinician's guide.

Authors:  Kevin McGeechan; Petra Macaskill; Les Irwig; Gerald Liew; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-24

4.  Pathway analysis using random forests with bivariate node-split for survival outcomes.

Authors:  Herbert Pang; Debayan Datta; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Approximate Statistical Tests for Comparing Supervised Classification Learning Algorithms.

Authors: 
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Statistical methods for the assessment of prognostic biomarkers (Part I): discrimination.

Authors:  Giovanni Tripepi; Kitty J Jager; Friedo W Dekker; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 7.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  A comparative study on splitting criteria of a survival tree based on the Cox proportional model.

Authors:  Asanao Shimokawa; Yohei Kawasaki; Etsuo Miyaoka
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.051

9.  A comparison of estimators to evaluate the discriminatory power of time-to-event models.

Authors:  Matthias Schmid; Sergej Potapov
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Regularized estimation for the accelerated failure time model.

Authors:  T Cai; J Huang; L Tian
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.