Literature DB >> 29263762

The challenges of a comprehensive surgical approach to Blount's disease.

T A Edwards1, R Hughes2, F Monsell3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate a surgical technique that aims to address the multi-planar deformities occurring in early onset Blount's disease.
METHODS: Seven patients (eight lower limbs) with early onset Blount's disease were treated with a surgical technique that used an external fixator to simultaneously address all aspects of deformity. Presenting radiographic parameters including mechanical axis deviation (MAD), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and medial plateau angle (MPA) were compared with final follow-up and the unaffected limb. Data was also collected on surgical complications and functional outcomes.
RESULTS: After a mean interval of 4.6 years (2.2 to 9), the MAD of the affected limb improved from 4.85 cm to 1.88 cm, MPTA from 43.58° to 75.46° and MPA from 43.41° to 20.71°. The mean time in the external fixator was 5.6 months (3.5 to 10.4). Recurrence was noted in three patients; two had evidence of nerve injury and one patient had premature fibular consolidation.
CONCLUSION: The surgical technique described in this study has attempted to address the complex multiaxial deformity that is encountered in Blount's disease. It identifies difficulties and limitations in developing a comprehensive surgical protocol and highlights complications associated with this approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blount’s disease; correction; definitive; surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 29263762      PMCID: PMC5725776          DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.11.170082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Orthop        ISSN: 1863-2521            Impact factor:   1.548


Introduction

Tibia vara is a developmental condition characterised by disordered endochondral ossification of the medial part of the proximal tibial physis.[1] The eponymous condition, described by Blount in 1937,[2] implies only a frontal plane deformity. Authors have since noted multi-planar abnormalities consisting of tibia vara, procurvatum and internal rotation.[1,3-5] These changes may lead to progressive limb-length discrepancies, gait abnormalities and premature osteoarthritis.[6-8] The aim of treatment is to achieve early correction with conventional osteotomies, stabilised with a plate, Kirschner wires or plaster cast.[9-11] In neglected or recurrent disease in older children, this approach is inadequate and a more complex method of deformity correction is required. This involves simultaneous tibial plateau elevation, correction of tibial metaphyseal deformity, lengthening and fibular epiphysiodesis.[12-14] The aim of this report is to assess the application of this technique, and to identify and discuss its limitations and complications.

Patients and methods

Patient selection

Seven patients (eight limbs) with early onset Blount’s disease were managed between 2005 and 2010 in the Bristol Royal Hospital for Children. Medical records were interrogated to determine patient demographics, operative details, complications and functional outcomes. Radiographs were evaluated to determine the accuracy of correction using standard metrics. Standard anterioposterior (AP) long leg radiographs were used to calculate the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and medial plateau angle (MPA). Radiological data was extracted and compared from pre-operative radiographs and those done at most recent follow-up.

Surgical technique

Clinical assessment and plain radiographs (AP, lateral and standing long leg alignment views) were obtained and used to determine the individual deformity characteristics (Fig. 1). Knee arthrography was initially performed to identify the orientation of the joint line in two planes and estimate the 3D deformity (Fig. 2).
Fig 1.

Standing long leg alignment radiograph of child with left sided Blount’s disease (a) and post-operative radiograph (b).

Fig 2.

Knee arthrogram to demonstrate posterior slope (a) and pathological varus joint line (b).

A proximal medial approach was used to conduct an osteotomy of the medial tibial plateau using a curved osteotome. The medial tibial plateau was elevated with a laminar spreader to reconstruct the joint line. The arthrogram demonstrated the extent of the cartilaginous anlage and the extent of elevation to produce a parallel joint line (Fig. 3).
Fig 3.

Medial approach to proximal tibia (a,b); osteotomy performed with curved osteotome (c); acute hemi-plateau elevation initially stabilised with K-wires (d).

A proximal fixator ring was used to maintain the corrected joint line, initially with two 6 mm half pins, with a third pin inserted to stabilise the proximal segment. A low energy tibial metaphyseal osteotomy was then performed with multiple drill holes and osteotome using the same incision. A proximal third, fibular osteotomy was performed using a separate incision, with a sub-periosteal approach protecting the superficial peroneal nerve. The distal segment was stabilised with three 6 mm half pins and a distal fixator ring was applied (Fig. 4). A hexapod external fixator (Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF); Smith & Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee) was used to simultaneously correct alignment, rotation and length. In five cases, distal femoral valgus deformity was present and was addressed with a medial hemi-epiphyseal staple (8 Plate; Orthofix, Verona, Italy) (Fig. 5).
Fig 4.

Definitive stabilisation of hemi-plateau with half pins (a); low energy tibial and fibular osteotomy (b).

Fig 5.

Anterioposterior (a) and lateral (b) radiographs of a right femur following insertion of 8 Plate staple. The posterior placement of the lateral staple is a technical error, but did not lead to clinical or radiological evidence of sagittal malalignment.

Results

Patient demographics

Seven patients were investigated with a mean follow-up period of 4.6 years (2.2 to 9.0). All were classified as Langenskiold stage VI.[15] The average age at surgery was 9.5 years (6.6 to 10.6) and the average weight at the time of surgery was 45.5 kg (36 to 64). The mean time in external fixator was 5.6 months (3.5 to 10.4) (Table 1).
Table 1.

Patient demographics

PatientAffected limbGenderAge at surgery (yrs)Weight at surgery (kg)Langenskiold ClassificationFollow-up (yrs)
1RightFemale6.640.5VI9.0
2RightFemale10.536.0VI3.6
3LeftFemale9.637.0VI4.6
4LeftFemale9.464.0VI2.2
5LeftMale10.552.0VI5.0
6* RightFemale10.436.0VI4.8
6* LeftFemale10.648.8VI4.6
7LeftFemale8.349.4VI2.9

patient 6 had bilateral involvement

patient 6 had bilateral involvement

Deformity characteristics

Following the acute hemi-plateau elevation, the mean pre-operative MPA of 43.41° (24.00° to 56.80°; mean normal limb: 23.46°) was corrected to a mean of 20.71° (4.18° to 37.20°) at most recent review. The mean pre-operative MAD of the affected limbs was 4.85 cm (0.47 cm to 7.95 cm; mean normal limb: 0.5 mm) corrected to a mean 1.88 cm (0.00 cm to 4.55 cm) at most recent review. The mean pre-operative MPTA of the affected limbs was 43.58° (29.90° to 76.95°; mean normal limb: 77.08°) corrected to a mean 75.46° (67.50° to 81.90°) at most recent review. The mean pre-operative LDFA of the five affected limbs was 78.66° (75.75° to 84.50°; mean normal limb: 80.17°) corrected to a mean 82.01° (78.50° to 90.15°) at most recent review (Table 2).
Table 2.

Normal, pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters

PatientParameterNormalPre-operativePost-operative
1MAD (cm)0.325.214.55
LDFA (°)81.2584.5090.15
MPTA (°)78.0055.7077.65
MPA (°)26.6036.8521.90
2MAD (cm)0.140.470.40
LDFA (°)81.1079.1080.05
MPTA (°)75.3076.9574.15
MPA (°)23.9024.0026.00
3MAD (cm)0.567.950.55
LDFA (°)80.7077.50* 82.25*
MPTA (°)75.6531.0072.50
MPA (°)24.3044.9529.10
4MAD (cm)-2.677.010.00
LDFA (°)77.7575.75* 78.50*
MPTA (°)73.3533.8581.90
MPA (°)21.9540.2022.10
5MAD (cm)0.163.153.51
LDFA (°)79.5578.5079.75
MPTA (°)80.8553.0067.50
MPA (°)16.7035.6017.45
6 (R)MAD (cm)n/a4.941.64
LDFA (°)n/a78.90* 80.85*
MPTA (°)n/a33.1077.00
MPA (°)n/a52.854.18
6 (L)MAD (cm)n/a4.153.13
LDFA (°)n/a83.65* 82.80*
MPTA (°)n/a35.1578.00
MPA (°)n/a56.807.78
7MAD (cm)1.185.941.27
LDFA (°)82.0577.50* 85.65*
MPTA (°)79.3529.9075.00
MPA (°)27.3056.0037.20
MeanMAD (cm)-0.054.851.88
LDFA (°)80.4079.4382.50
MPTA (°)77.0843.5875.46
MPA (°)23.4643.4120.71

received distal femoral 8 Plate staple

MAD, mechanical axis deviation; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; MPA, medial plateau angle

received distal femoral 8 Plate staple MAD, mechanical axis deviation; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; MPA, medial plateau angle

Surgical complications

The operative technique was generally well tolerated. Table 3 details the complications and functional outcomes of each patient. Pin site infection occurred in four patients and three resolved with a single course of oral antibiotics. One patient developed recurrent infections and required a protracted course of oral antibiotics. One patient developed temporary paraesthesia over the anterior aspect of the proximal tibia. One patient developed a complete left peroneal nerve palsy, with complete recovery after 15 months. Premature consolidation of the fibular osteotomy was seen in one patient, one month after initial surgery. This required a course of physiotherapy and had recovered at most recent review.
Table 3.

Clinical and functional outcomes following surgery

PatientTime in frame (mths)InfectionNerve injuryRoMPremature consolidationRecurrenceFunctional outcome
13.5Pin siteNoFullNoTSF reapplied twiceNo deficit
23.7Pin siteNoFullNoNoNo deficit
35.7Pin siteNoFullNoNoPlaying sports
47.1Pin siteParaesthesia proximal tibiaFullNoNoNo deficit
54.6NoNoFullPremature fibular consolidationNoPlaying rugby and badminton
6 (R)4.4NoNoFullNoTibia and fibula epiphysiodesisNo deficit
6 (L)5.1NoPeroneal palsyFullNoTibia and fibula epiphysiodesis. TSF reappliedNo deficit
710.4NoNoFullNoNoOccasionally uses crutches

RoM, range of movement; TSF, Taylor Spatial Frame

RoM, range of movement; TSF, Taylor Spatial Frame

Recurrence

Two patients (three limbs) developed recurrence of the original deformity. Patient 1 had persistent torsional asymmetry and required correction two years after the initial surgery with re-application of a hexapod external fixator for four months. This was due to failing to appreciate the extent of the pre-existing deformity and represents an error of pre-operative surgical planning. A further noticeable abnormality required the use of the TSF five years later, but this patient has since been stable. Patient 6 required bilateral tibial and fibular epiphysiodesis two years after initial surgery. There was recurrence of the varus deformity in the left knee nine months after epiphysiodesis which was corrected with five months in a TSF. One patient occasionally uses crutches to ease the pain in her left knee, the other six are enjoying various sporting activities without limitation. At most recent follow up, all patients had regained a full range of knee movement (Table 3).

Discussion

Recent studies have investigated individual aspects of the surgical management of Blount’s disease including closing wedge tibial osteotomies,[16] fibular osteotomy,[17] hemi-epiphyseal stapling[18] and different types of external fixators.[19] This study aimed to provide an evaluation of a technique required to simultaneously address all components of early onset Blount’s disease. The classical radiographic changes seen in Blount’s disease are well known.[1,5,20-22] However, plain radiographs have the potential to overestimate the apparent depression of the medial plateau.[23,24] The proposed technique advocates the use of an intra-operative arthrogram which is useful in delineating the articular surface and provides information in two planes. The arthrography is performed as a precursor to the procedure under the same anaesthetic and provides information on the geometry of the articular correction. The medial tibial plateau elevation is performed acutely and there is ongoing debate on the relative merits of iliac crest graft or gradual correction as an alternative. A prospective randomised clinical trial by Zorzi et al[25] compared high tibial opening-wedge osteotomies with and without autologous iliac crest bone grafts. Blinded investigators concluded that all osteotomies had achieved bone union and that the difference in time to union was not statistically significant. The potential complications of bone grafting include infection, pain and failure.[26,27] As patients requiring high degrees of correction often yield less than adequate bone,[28] this method is not advocated. Gradual correction has been reported to be a reliable and safe method of treating multi-planar deformities.[29,30] Following a percutaneous osteotomy with progressive opening wedge correction using a modified Wagner monolateral fixator in ten patients (20 tibias) with late-onset Blount’s disease, de Pablos et al[29] noted, apart from one case of under-correction, no major complications. Similar results were noted when Coogan et al[30] reviewed their use of a circular external fixator in eight obese adolescents (12 tibias) undergoing gradual correction. A single case of premature consolidation was noted and this required a repeat osteotomy. The low incidence of neurovascular injury is likely to be due to the avoidance of acute intra-operative traction on the neurovascular structures. Acute correction in Blount’s disease can be accomplished with a proximal tibial metaphyseal osteotomy.[1] A variety of techniques have been suggested, including closing wedge,[14] serrated,[31] inclined,[32] dome[33] and as was done in this study, an opening wedge osteotomy[34] (Fig. 3). We have used an acute opening wedge osteotomy without grafting and have observed uncomplicated union in all cases. Occasionally, like in Figure 3, this produced a medial metaphyseal prominence. This was not resected and it remodelled with time and did not produce a clinical or cosmetic abnormality. Alternative methods of stabilisation have been reported and include smooth pins and wires,[35] cast immobilisation,[35] plates and screws,[34] inter-fragmentary screws[32] and external fixators (Fig. 4).[36-38] Chotigavanichaya et al[39] conducted a retrospective review of osteotomies performed for late-onset Blount’s disease. Of these, 34 were cross-pinned while 14 were held with an external fixator. At six years follow-up, the recurrence of varus deformity was 94% in those who were pinned and 72% in those with an external fixator. Following external fixator use in this study, three of eight (37.5%) limbs had recurrence after initial complete correction. This is due to the effect of residual growth in the proximal tibial physis and the procedure has been modified to include formal drill epiphysiodesis at the time of fixator removal. An alternative approach would involve physeal ablation at the time of initial surgery, but this would potentially compromise the stability and viability of the epimetaphyseal fragment and is considered unwise, from a theoretical perspective alone. Regardless of the type of osteotomy and fixation device, there is a potential for serious adverse effects including compartment syndrome and focal neurological injury.[40,35-37] In this report, one patient had mild paraesthesia lasting weeks, while one patient had a long episode of sensory and motor deficit of the peroneal nerve. A retrospective review of 116 children with 129 tibial osteotomies performed by Payman et al[41] noted 35 cases of delayed union, two cases with transient peroneal nerve palsy, one case of nonunion and one case of malunion. More recently, Wilson et al[42] reported a complication rate of 153% following 38 high tibial osteotomies with external fixation in patients with Blount’s disease; both studies highlighted Blount’s disease and obesity as factors increasing the complication rate. The peroneal nerve is at risk at the time of fibular osteotomy and our recommendation is to perform the osteotomy through an incision that permits sub-periosteal exposure and osteotomy under direct vision. Paradoxically, this may increase the risk of neurapraxia due to a traction injury as seen in transient sensory loss in one patient. The site of the proximal fibular osteotomy is determined by the geometry of the tibial deformity and whilst a more distal division would be less likely to injure the peroneal nerve, it would produce a secondary fibular deformity that is frequently associated with local soft-tissue irritation. The fact that the complete peroneal nerve injury recovered without intervention indicates that this was also a traction injury, most likely at the time of fibular osteotomy. Application of the TSF and a metaphyseal osteotomy allows six-axis deformity correction guided by a computer-generated schedule. Following TSF use in 14 obese children, Li et al[43] noted an improved MAD from 90 mm to 10 mm 14 months post-application, a more pronounced improvement than the 30 mm seen in this study. Feldman et al[44] noted 21 of 22 tibias being corrected to within 3° of normal. This is comparable with the average MPTA improvement in this study from 44° to 75°, with the average normal limb being 77°. The complications of TSF use include pin site infections,[44] strut disengagement[43] and in this series, one case of recurrent pin site infection and three transient superficial infections. The purpose of this description is to demonstrate proof of principle and that failure of full correction is in part due to the simultaneous correction of all components. A retrospective review of 208 leg deformities corrected with either the TSF or Ilizarov ring was done by Manner et al[45] In complex multidirectional deformities with four dimensions, correction was achieved in only 66.7% of patients following TSF use. The study demonstrates the difficulty in achieving full anatomical reconstruction in complex deformity and this is a shortcoming of this approach. There was, however, a useful improvement in alignment evidenced by the level of final function in the majority at most recent follow-up. Patient 7 had a poor outcome and it is important to highlight this in a candid manner. She occasionally uses crutches to ease hip and knee pain. Subsequent MRI scans have demonstrated no structural cause for her symptoms and she in engaging in a weight reduction programme and participating in swimming and field sports. The deformity is complex, and the potential for failure and the need for further procedures should be carefully discussed as part of the consenting process. In this series, five patients required a distal femoral 8 Plate staple to address distal valgus deformity; this is a simple addition to the procedure and is recommended in cases with asymmetry of LDFA demonstrated in pre-operative standing alignment radiographs. The degree of deformity that mandates correction is controversial, and a pragmatic approach used in this series was to correct deformity > 5°. Castañeda et al[46] conducted a retrospective case series studying hemiepiphysiodesis for correction of angular deformities about the knee caused by a variety of diseases. They noted an improvement of 3° in the patients with Blount’s disease, similar to the LDFA improvement seen in the five femurs that underwent stapling in this study. Disappointing results were seen in 2012 by Oto et al[47] when tibial epiphysiodesis was used alone; the authors did not recommend this technique, highlighting the need for an all-inclusive surgical method.

Conclusion

Overall, the technique discussed is an effective way of improving the multi-dimensional deformity associated with early onset Blount’s disease. We have attempted to highlight the limitations of this surgical approach. Good functional outcomes and improved radiological measurements are produced in the majority but a significant incidence of recurrence and neurological complications have required further modifications of the surgical technique.
  42 in total

1.  Inverted arcuate osteotomy and external fixation for adolescent tibia vara.

Authors:  S Miller; T Radomisli; R Ulin
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  The utility of MR in assessing Blount disease.

Authors:  Joseph G Craig; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2002-01-30       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Adolescent Blount disease in obese children treated by eight-plate hemiepiphysiodesis.

Authors:  Murat Oto; Güney Yılmaz; J Richard Bowen; Mihir Thacker; Richard Kruse
Journal:  Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi       Date:  2012-04

4.  Proximal tibial osteotomy with compression plate fixation for tibia vara.

Authors:  S D Martin; M C Moran; T L Martin; S W Burke
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

5.  Failure of Orthofix eight-Plate for the treatment of Blount disease.

Authors:  Samuel Schroerlucke; Styles Bertrand; John Clapp; Justin Bundy; Frederick O Gregg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

6.  Complete Closing Wedge Osteotomy for Correction of Blount Disease (Tibia Vara): A Technique.

Authors:  Alex Burton; William Hennrikus
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2016-01

7.  Multiplanar deformity analysis of untreated Blount disease.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sabharwal; James Lee; Caixia Zhao
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Complications of tibial osteotomies in children with comorbidities.

Authors:  K Rad Payman; Victoria Patenall; Peter Borden; Terri Green; Norman Y Otsuka
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Dynamic axial external fixation in the surgical treatment of tibia vara.

Authors:  C T Price; D S Scott; D A Greenberg
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Accuracy of complex lower-limb deformity correction with external fixation: a comparison of the Taylor Spatial Frame with the Ilizarov ring fixator.

Authors:  Hans Michael Manner; Michael Huebl; Christof Radler; Rudolf Ganger; Gert Petje; Franz Grill
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2006-12-30       Impact factor: 1.548

View more
  8 in total

1.  Controlled Double Gradual Opening Osteotomy for the Treatment of Severe Varus of the Knee-Blount's Disease.

Authors:  Flavio Dos Santos Cerqueira; Guilherme Augusto T Araújo Motta; José Leonardo Rocha de Faria; Isabella Sandrini Pizzolatti; Diego Perez da Motta; Marcelo Mandarino; Leandro Albuquerque Lemgruber Kropf; Fernando Dos Santos Cerqueira
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2021-08-28

2.  Gradual Deformity Correction with a Computer-assisted Hexapod External Fixator in Blount's Disease.

Authors:  Pieter H Mare; Leonard C Marais
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2022 Jan-Apr

3.  Blount's disease successfully treated with intraepiphyseal osteotomy with elevation of the medial plateau of the tibia-a case report with 65 years' follow-up.

Authors:  Terje Terjesen; Darko Anticevic
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Acute Correction and Plate Fixation for the Management of Severe Infantile Blount's Disease: Short-term Results.

Authors:  Abdullah A Nada; Mostafa E Hammad; Ahmed F Eltanahy; Ahmed A Gazar; Ahmed M Khalifa; Mohamed H El-Sayed
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2021 May-Aug

5.  Comparing complications of outpatient management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis and Blount's disease: A database study.

Authors:  Achraf Jardaly; Timothy W Torrez; Gerald McGwin; Shawn R Gilbert
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 6.  Osteotomy treatments and post-operative fixations for Blount disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  Panji Sananta; Joko Santoso; Muhammad Alwy Sugiarto
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-21

7.  Do Different Tibial Osteotomy Techniques Affect Sagittal Alignment in Children with Blount Disease?

Authors:  Piyanuch Musikachart; Perajit Eamsobhana
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Tibia vara or Blount's disease: Why an early diagnosis and treatment are important?

Authors:  Angelo V Vasiliadis; Alexandros Maris; Srinivas Gadikoppula
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2020-05-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.