| Literature DB >> 35734039 |
Pieter H Mare1, Leonard C Marais2.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the results in terms of correction and complications from gradual correction with a computer-assisted hexapod circular external fixator in a mixed cohort of children with Blount's disease. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed of the correction and complications of 19 children (25 limbs) with recurrent infantile (IBD) and late-onset Blount's disease (LOBD) treated by gradual correction with a hexapod external fixator. The correction was measured by the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), anatomic posterior proximal tibial angle (aPPTA) and anatomic tibio-femoral angle (TFA). Obesity was present in 76% (19/25) of cases. Fifteen limbs were classified as infantile Blount's disease and 10 limbs as late-onset Blount's disease. The mean age was 12.5 years (range 7-17 years).Entities:
Keywords: Blount's disease; External fixation; Gradual correction; Hexapod; Tibia Vara; Tibial osteotomy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35734039 PMCID: PMC9166260 DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1549
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr ISSN: 1828-8928
Fig. 1A to D(A) Clinical picture of the lower limbs of an 11-year-old girl with recurrent Blount's disease on the left; (B) Post-operative AP radiograph of the knee with the external fixator applied and the osteotomy visible; (C) Clinical picture of the lower limbs at skeletal maturity; (D) Standing long-film AP radiograph of the lower limbs at skeletal maturity
Fig. 2A and B(A) Screen-captured image showing the planned correction during the deformity correction planning process from the HEX-ray module of the TLHEX application software (www.tlhex.com); (B) AP radiograph of the knee and proximal tibia and fibula depicting the limb after gradual correction
Summary and comparative analysis of the pre- and post-operative descriptive characteristics of our patient cohort
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Agei | 11.2 (7-14) | 14.5(11-17) | <0.001vi |
| Obesity [%( | 73% (11) | 80% (8) | 0.702vii |
| Bilateral | 87% (13) | 60% (6) | 0.126vii |
| Previous surgery | 100% (15) | 30% (3) | <0.001vii |
|
| |||
| TFAii | −30° (−4° to−53°) | −26° (−15° to −42°) | 0.482vi |
| MPTAiii | 57° (69° to 37°) | 61° (74° to 33°) | 0.544vi |
| aPPTAiv | 60° (84° to 33°) | 69° (83° to 45°) | 0.135vi |
| Internal rotationv | 15° (0° to 30°) | 14° (0° to 49°) | 0.333vii |
|
| |||
| TFAii | 1.2° (−14° to 13°) | 2.4° (−5° to 10°) | 0.761vi |
| MPTAiii | 86° (77° to 92°) | 87° (82 to 93°) | 0.956vii |
| aPPTAiv | 79° (70° to 89°) | 79° (70° to 90°) | 0.857vi |
(i) Mean age in years (range); (ii) Mean tibio-femoral angle (TFA) (range), negative values denote varus alignment; (iii) Mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) (range); (iv) Mean anatomic proximal posterior tibial angle (aPPTA) (range); (v) Median internal rotation (range); (vi) Student's t-test; (vii) Chi-squared test; (viii) Mann–Whitney U-test
Summary and comparative analysis of the correction, results and complication rate of gradual correction in our patient cohort
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Program numberi | 1 (1−5) | 2 (1−3) | 0.822vi |
| Correction daysii | 19 (11−71) | 14 (7−33) | 0.337vi |
| Total daysii | 136 (85−180) | 137 (91−201) | 0.925vii |
|
| |||
| Goodiii | 50% (5) | 60% (6) | |
| Acceptableiv | 30% (3) | 40% (4) | 0.327viii |
| Poorv | 20% (2) | 0% (0) | |
|
| |||
| Category 1 | 100% (15) | 100% (10) | |
| Category 2 | 27% (4) | 0% (0) | 0.075viii |
| Category 3A | 7% (1) | 0% (0) | 0.229viii |
| Category 3B | 7% (1) | 0% (0) |
(i) Median (range); (ii) Mean total days in external fixator (range); (iii) 1° valgus to 11° valgus tibio-femoral angle (TFA); (iv) 0–9° varus TFA; (v) >11° valgus, >9° varus; (vi) Mann–Whitney U-test; (vii) Student's t-test; (viii) Chi-squared test