| Literature DB >> 29263391 |
Bo Zhang1, Xiangyang Xu1,2, Liang Zhu3,4.
Abstract
To better understand the relationship between the environmental variables and microbial communities of activated sludge, we took winter samples from different biological treatment units (anaerobic, oxic, etc) from the WWTP's of a number of Chinese cities. Differences in influent organic components and activated sludge microbial communities were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and high-throughput sequencing technology, respectively. Liquid nitrogen grinding pretreatment of samples was found to aid in the obtaining of a more bio-diversified sample. Influent type and dissolved oxygen concentration influenced the activated sludge microbial community structure. Nitrospira, Caldilineaceae and Anaerolineaceae were highly related to domestic wastewater treatment systems, whereas Thauera was the most abundant putative refractory aromatic hydrocarbon decomposer found in industrial wastewater treatment systems. Within the influent composition, we speculate that Thauera, Macellibacteroides and Desulfomicrobium are the key functional genera of the anaerobic environment of the textile dyeing industry wastewater treatment systems, whilst Thauera and Thiobacillus are key functional microbes in fine chemical wastewater treatment systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29263391 PMCID: PMC5738398 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17743-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristic of all the WWTPs.
| Full name | The type of influent | Process | Sampling site | Code | DNA extraction method | Influent average of the month (or range) (mg/L) | Removal rate | sampling date | Temperature | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOD | COD | T-N (or NH4 + -N) | T-P | BOD | COD | TN | NH4-N | T-P | ||||||||
| Qi-ge II | Domestic sewage predominant | Inverted A2O | Oxic train | QG | Isolation Kit | 220 | 553.57 | 55 (TN); 40 (NH4 + -N) | 11 | 97% | 93.30% | 71.70% | 91.70% | 90.70% | 2015.01.24 | 10–18 °C |
| Xiang-yang | Domestic sewage predominant (20% industrial waste water) | Improved A2O | Oxic train | XY | Isolation Kit | / | 200–300 | 20 (NH4 + -N) | / | / | / | / | / | / | 2015.02.15 | 6–11 °C |
| XY_Gr | Liquid nitrogen grinding + Isolation Kit | |||||||||||||||
| Shao-xing I | Mainly dyeing wastewater (about 80%) | coagulation + A/O process (with sludge reflux) | Anaerobic train | SX_1_A | Isolation Kit | 148 | 437 | 77.5 (TN); 59.7 (NH4 + -N) | 6.74 | 94.50% | 77.80% | 65% | 98% | 97% | 2015.01.24 | 8–16 °C |
| Oxic train | SX_1_O | Isolation Kit | ||||||||||||||
| Shao-xing II | Mainly dyeing wastewater (about 85%) | Coagulation + oxidation ditch | Oxidation ditch | SX_2_O | Isolation Kit | 164 | 672 | 75.8 (TN); 65.3 (NH4 + -N) | 5.26 | 95.30% | 86% | 32.80% | 99% | 99% | 2015.01.24 | 8–16 °C |
| Shao-xing III | Same with Shao-xing I | Coagulation + anaerobic tank (oxidation ditch form) + oxidation ditch | Hydrolytic train | SX_3_A | Isolation Kit | same with I | 94.20% | 79.27% | 68% | 98.90% | 98.10% | 2015.01.24 | 8–16 °C | |||
| Oxidation ditch | SX_3_O | Isolation Kit | ||||||||||||||
| Shang-yu | Domestic sewage + Fine chemical industry waste water (about 55%) | Anaerobic hydrolyze + A/O (with sludge reflux) | Anoxic train | SY_A | Isolation Kit | 100–140 | 294 | 38.9 (NH4 + -N) | 7.47 | / | 0.42 | / | 85.19% | 14.60% | 2015.01.22 | 6–16 °C |
| Oxic train | SY_O | Isolation Kit | ||||||||||||||
BOD: biochemical oxygen demand; COD: chemical oxygen demand; T-N: total Kjeldhal nitrogen NH4+ −N: ammonia nitrogen; T-P: total phosphorus; A2O: anaerobic-anoxic-oxic; A/O: anaerobic- oxic.
Figure 1TIC chromatogram of Shang-yu, Qi-ge and Shao-xing WWTP influent and the main possibly organic compounds. R.T = Retention Time.
Values of OTUs, Chao 1 and ACE (Alpha-diversity index) in different WWTPs.
| Sample ID | Reads | OUT | ACE | Chao | Coverage | Shannon | Simpson |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 29058 | 806 | 893(867,930) | 896(863,948) | 0.995802 | 5.28(5.26,5.29) | 0.0172(0.0165,0.0178) |
|
| 33570 | 546 | 651(619,697) | 642(607,699) | 0.996425 | 4.1(4.08,4.12) | 0.0381(0.0375,0.0388) |
|
| 24803 | 655 | 855(804,923) | 854(792,944) | 0.992219 | 4.13(4.1,4.15) | 0.0582(0.0564,0.06) |
|
| 21207 | 588 | 694(662,738) | 727(677,806) | 0.993776 | 4(3.96,4.03) | 0.0991(0.0957,0.1026) |
|
| 34099 | 570 | 657(629,696) | 683(641,751) | 0.996569 | 4.19(4.17,4.21) | 0.0434(0.0424,0.0445) |
|
| 30613 | 611 | 709(679,751) | 751(700,833) | 0.995851 | 3.76(3.74,3.79) | 0.1303(0.1267,0.1338) |
|
| 32098 | 545 | 606(585,640) | 634(596,700) | 0.997321 | 4.59(4.57,4.61) | 0.0278(0.0271,0.0284) |
|
| 25636 | 478 | 525(507,553) | 533(508,578) | 0.997269 | 4.33(4.31,4.35) | 0.0379(0.0369,0.039) |
|
| 34108 | 802 | 857(839,884) | 870(843,914) | 0.997068 | 4.68(4.65,4.7) | 0.0564(0.0546,0.0582) |
|
| 28212 | 791 | 859(838,891) | 886(850,943) | 0.995824 | 4.83(4.8,4.85) | 0.046(0.0444,0.0477) |
Figure 2Bacterial community composition at phylum (A) and genus level (B).
Figure 3Similarity analysis of the 9 sludge samples. (A) Based on CA cluster analysis, according to Bray Curtis distance (the average linkage); (B) Based on PCoA (Principle co-ordinates analysis). Every dot represent a sample plotted according to their OUT composition and abundance(stress value = 0.12), a positive correlation between the distance of two dot and their similarity. Cluster the 9 samples into 3 groups. Group I contains SX-1-O, SX-2-O, SX-3-O, SY-A, SY-O; Group II contains SX-1-A, SX-3-A; Group III contains QG and XY.
The core genera distribution.
| sample code | SX-1-A | SX-3-A | SX-1-O | SX-2-O | SX-3-O | SY-A | SY-O | QG | XY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| core genus (percentage) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Totally | 62.35% | 53.79% | 47.10% | 46.39% | 50.50% | 40.37% | 46.61% | 27.99% | 40.25% |
Figure 4Heat-map of microbial community composition with cluster analysis. The color intensity in each panel shows the percentage in a sample, referring to color key at the bottom.