| Literature DB >> 25822481 |
Özge Eyice1, Motonobu Namura2, Yin Chen1, Andrew Mead1, Siva Samavedam1, Hendrik Schäfer1.
Abstract
Dimethylsulphide (DMS) has an important role in the global sulphur cycle and atmospheric chemistry. Microorganisms using DMS as sole carbon, sulphur or energy source, contribute to the cycling of DMS in a wide variety of ecosystems. The diversity of microbial populations degrading DMS in terrestrial environments is poorly understood. Based on cultivation studies, a wide range of bacteria isolated from terrestrial ecosystems were shown to be able to degrade DMS, yet it remains unknown whether any of these have important roles in situ. In this study, we identified bacteria using DMS as a carbon and energy source in terrestrial environments, an agricultural soil and a lake sediment, by DNA stable isotope probing (SIP). Microbial communities involved in DMS degradation were analysed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, high-throughput sequencing of SIP gradient fractions and metagenomic sequencing of phi29-amplified community DNA. Labelling patterns of time course SIP experiments identified members of the Methylophilaceae family, not previously implicated in DMS degradation, as dominant DMS-degrading populations in soil and lake sediment. Thiobacillus spp. were also detected in (13)C-DNA from SIP incubations. Metagenomic sequencing also suggested involvement of Methylophilaceae in DMS degradation and further indicated shifts in the functional profile of the DMS-assimilating communities in line with methylotrophy and oxidation of inorganic sulphur compounds. Overall, these data suggest that unlike in the marine environment where gammaproteobacterial populations were identified by SIP as DMS degraders, betaproteobacterial Methylophilaceae may have a key role in DMS cycling in terrestrial environments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25822481 PMCID: PMC4611497 DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISME J ISSN: 1751-7362 Impact factor: 10.302
Figure 1Genus-level taxonomic profiling of the pyrosequencing data sets of 16S rRNA genes of heavy (fraction 7; F7) and light fractions (fraction 12, F12) from [12C2]-DMS or [13C2]-DMS incubated microcosms using (a) soil sample or (b) lake sediment sample. (c, d) Ordination of canonical variates (CV1 and CV2) produced from canonical variate analysis of pyrosequencing data at family level. Sample labels include the fraction number (F7 (HF) or F12 (LF)) and type of carbon used (12C or 13C). Numbers under each plot refer to the SIP experiment time point and replicate number. i.e. 2.1: second time point, replicate 1. Numbers in (c) represent nine different SIP fractions from the soil microcosm samples. (1) Time point 1, 12C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (2) Time point 1, 13C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (3) Time point 1, 13C ‘light' fraction (F12), (4) Time point 2, 12C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (5) Time- point 2, 13C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (6) Time point 2, 13C ‘light' fraction (F12), (7) Time point 3, 12C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (8) Time point 3, 13C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (9) Time point 3, 13C ‘light' fraction (F12). Numbers in (d) represent three different treatments in the lake sediment microcosm samples. (1) 12C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (2) 13C ‘heavy' fraction (F7), (3) 13C ‘light' fraction (F12). Big dots represent the means and small dots represent the individual observations. Note that only the most predominant taxa in each fraction are colour-annotated, including Methylotenera (yellow), unclassified Methylophilaceae (green), Thiobacillus (brown), other Methylophilaceae (amber) and other Betaproteobacteria (dark green). The relative abundances of the 15 most abundant genera found in the ‘heavy' DNA fractions identified in the pyrosequencing data are shown in the Supplementary Table 2.
Figure 2Mean abundances and LSD values of Methylophilaceae (dark grey), Hydrogenophilaceae (light grey) and other Betaproteobacteria (black) in 13C-labelled ‘heavy' and ‘light' fractions from each time point. Note that only families which had significantly higher abundances in the ‘heavy' fractions were shown. F7: ‘heavy' fraction F12: ‘light' fraction. (a) Soil, (b) Lake sediment.
Assembly results of metagenomic reads from the soil and lake sediment SIP fractions
| Total number of contigs | 80 987 | 28 382 | 53 331 | 22 094 |
| Total contig length (bp) | 103 612 778 | 49 050 429 | 65 621 201 | 28 430 434 |
| Average contig length (bp) | 1279 | 1728 | 1230 | 1286 |
| N50 (bp) | 1567 | 2 708 | 1449 | 1628 |
| Median (bp) | 769 | 934 | 767 | 753 |
Raw sequences obtained by Illumina sequencing were assembled into contigs using Ray Meta (Boisvert .
Figure 3Family-level taxonomic analysis of metagenomic sequences obtained from ‘light' and ‘heavy' DNA samples from the SIP incubations using the STAMP software. Dark grey bars represent the ‘light' DNA and light grey bars represent the ‘heavy' DNA. Methylophilaceae family had the greatest proportional difference in the both ‘heavy' metagenomes. (a) Soil, (b) Lake sediment.
Figure 4Functional analysis of metagenomic sequences from the carbohydrate metabolism category (MG-RAST) obtained from ‘light' and ‘heavy' DNA samples from the SIP incubations using the STAMP software. Dark grey bars represent the ‘light' DNA and light grey bars represent the ‘heavy' DNA. (a) Soil, (b) Lake sediment.
Figure 5Relative abundance of methylotrophy- and sulphur-related functional genes relative to recA (single copy control gene) in ‘heavy' and ‘light' metagenomes. Dark grey bars represent the ‘light' DNA and light grey bars represent the ‘heavy' DNA. (a) Soil, (b) Lake sediment. Numbers are based on features identified in assembled reads of the metagenomes as shown in Supplementary Table 4.