| Literature DB >> 29263338 |
Zhuanzhuan Yan1, Fan Wu1, Kai Luo1, Yufeng Zhao1, Qi Yan1, Yufei Zhang1, Yanrong Wang1, Jiyu Zhang2.
Abstract
Melilotus is one of the most important legume forages, but the lack of molecular markers has limited the development and utilization of Melilotus germplasm resources. In the present study, 151 M clean reads were generated from various genotypes of Melilotus albus using Illumina sequencing. A total of 19,263 potential EST-SSRs were identified from 104,358 unigene sequences. Moreover, 18,182 primer pairs were successfully designed, and 550 primer pairs were selected using criteria of base repeat type, fragment length and annealing temperature. In addition, 550 primer pairs were screened by using PCR amplification products and used to assess polymorphisms in 15 M. albus accessions. A total of 114 primer pairs were detected as being highly polymorphic, and the average polymorphism information content (PIC) value was 0.79. Furthermore, those 114 polymorphic primer pairs were used to evaluate the transferability to 18 species of the genus Melilotus, and 70 EST-SSR markers were found to be transferable among the 18 Melilotus species. According to the UPGMA dendrogram and STRUCTURE analysis, the 18 Melilotus species were classified into three clusters. This study offers a valuable resource for the genetic diversity and molecular assisted breeding of germplasm resources in the genus Melilotus.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29263338 PMCID: PMC5738344 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18049-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Distribution of EST-SSRs with different repeat types.
| Repeats | Mononucleotide | Dinucleotide | Trinucleotide | Tetranucleotide | Pentanucleotide | Hexanucleotide | Total | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 0 | 0 | 2247 | 282 | 27 | 5 | 2561 | 13.29 |
| 6 | 0 | 1221 | 1002 | 34 | 2 | 3 | 2262 | 11.74 |
| 7 | 0 | 674 | 378 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1055 | 5.48 |
| 8 | 0 | 540 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 564 | 2.93 |
| 9 | 0 | 409 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 409 | 2.12 |
| 10 | 5040 | 271 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5313 | 27.58 |
| 11 | 2503 | 82 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2586 | 13.42 |
| 12 | 1397 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1400 | 7.27 |
| 13 | 952 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 952 | 4.94 |
| 14 | 685 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 685 | 3.56 |
| 15 | 456 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 456 | 2.37 |
| 16 | 340 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 340 | 1.77 |
| 17 | 238 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 238 | 1.24 |
| 18 | 181 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 181 | 0.94 |
| 19 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 0.56 |
| 20 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 0.46 |
| 21 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 0.22 |
| 22 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0.08 |
| 23 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0.03 |
| 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.01 |
| Total | 12052 | 3200 | 3654 | 319 | 29 | 9 | 19263 | |
| Percentage (%) | 62.57 | 16.61 | 18.97 | 1.66 | 0.15 | 0.05 |
Figure 1EST-SSR marker variations of 18 Melilotus species using primers 86, 170, 281 and 547. Each accession includes three individual plants; the letter ‘M’ denotes the molecular markers, which are 200 bp and 150 bp (top to bottom) with primer 86, primer 170, primer 281 and primer 547 (top to bottom).
Figure 2Comparative electropherogram analysis of four EST-SSR loci (primers 21, 31, 61 and 392) among different accessions of M. albus. The primer 21 had trinucleotide repeats of (TTC)4, (TTC)5, and (TTC)7. (TCT)4, and (TCT)7 were obtained using primer 31. Primer 61 can generate tandem repeats of (GATTA)4 and (GATTA)5. (GA)7, (GA)8 and (GA)12 were obtained by using primer 392.
Polymorphism analysis of 70 EST-SSR primers with 18 Melilotus species.
| Primer code |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.80 |
| 3 | 8 | 0.11 | 0.75 | 0.73 |
| 4 | 4 | 0.08 | 0.65 | 0.60 |
| 10 | 4 | 0.10 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| 11 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 17 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
| 21 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| 22 | 5 | 0.25 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 36 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
| 37 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.71 | 0.65 |
| 39 | 4 | 0.08 | 0.67 | 0.60 |
| 55 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.44 | 0.42 |
| 56 | 5 | 0.08 | 0.71 | 0.67 |
| 61 | 7 | 0.24 | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| 62 | 7 | 0.02 | 0.70 | 0.67 |
| 63 | 6 | 0.10 | 0.78 | 0.74 |
| 66 | 7 | 0.11 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| 72 | 7 | 0.06 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| 76 | 5 | 0.04 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 79 | 6 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 86 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 0.74 |
| 87 | 4 | 0.10 | 0.67 | 0.60 |
| 89 | 5 | 0.07 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| 97 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.46 | 0.42 |
| 99 | 5 | 0.26 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 102 | 6 | 0.11 | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| 104 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
| 109 | 7 | 0.22 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 112 | 6 | 0.06 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 117 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 127 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.74 | 0.71 |
| 132 | 5 | 0.02 | 0.69 | 0.65 |
| 134 | 6 | 0.04 | 0.76 | 0.72 |
| 137 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| 140 | 6 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 143 | 3 | 0.06 | 0.50 | 0.42 |
| 151 | 5 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| 170 | 6 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 176 | 3 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.24 |
| 196 | 7 | 0.04 | 0.79 | 0.76 |
| 213 | 4 | 1.00 | 0.63 | 0.57 |
| 214 | 5 | 0.09 | 0.72 | 0.68 |
| 217 | 7 | 0.09 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| 219 | 9 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 0.86 |
| 222 | 7 | 0.09 | 0.81 | 0.79 |
| 242 | 7 | 0.04 | 0.76 | 0.73 |
| 252 | 4 | 0.00 | 0.69 | 0.64 |
| 266 | 7 | 0.12 | 0.84 | 0.82 |
| 267 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| 278 | 6 | 0.39 | 0.80 | 0.77 |
| 281 | 9 | 0.04 | 0.87 | 0.86 |
| 293 | 6 | 0.06 | 0.78 | 0.75 |
| 294 | 8 | 0.15 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| 302 | 9 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 351 | 8 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| 357 | 11 | 0.07 | 0.87 | 0.85 |
| 377 | 6 | 0.15 | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| 383 | 2 | 0.00 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 392 | 4 | 0.93 | 0.54 | 0.43 |
| 419 | 9 | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.81 |
| 424 | 5 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.68 |
| 433 | 10 | 0.13 | 0.88 | 0.87 |
| 447 | 7 | 0.51 | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| 451 | 6 | 0.04 | 0.77 | 0.73 |
| 461 | 8 | 0.20 | 0.82 | 0.80 |
| 472 | 8 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| 508 | 5 | 0.03 | 0.72 | 0.67 |
| 545 | 5 | 0.26 | 0.74 | 0.70 |
| 547 | 8 | 0.04 | 0.84 | 0.82 |
| 548 | 5 | 0.08 | 0.73 | 0.69 |
| Mean | 5.87 | 0.11 | 0.72 | 0.69 |
Note: N , number of alleles, H , observed heterozygosity, H , expected heterozygosity, PIC, polymorphic information content.
Genetic diversity of 18 Melilotus species was detected by 70 EST-SSR markers.
| Species | NPL | PPL (%) | na | ne | h | I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 106 | 25.79% | 1.258 | 1.173 | 0.1 | 0.147 |
|
| 30 | 7.30% | 1.073 | 1.05 | 0.029 | 0.042 |
|
| 57 | 13.87% | 1.139 | 1.093 | 0.054 | 0.079 |
|
| 20 | 4.87% | 1.049 | 1.035 | 0.02 | 0.029 |
|
| 47 | 11.44% | 1.114 | 1.076 | 0.044 | 0.065 |
|
| 34 | 8.27% | 1.083 | 1.052 | 0.031 | 0.046 |
|
| 68 | 16.55% | 1.166 | 1.109 | 0.063 | 0.094 |
|
| 21 | 5.11% | 1.051 | 1.033 | 0.019 | 0.029 |
|
| 103 | 25.06% | 1.251 | 1.16 | 0.094 | 0.14 |
|
| 24 | 5.84% | 1.058 | 1.042 | 0.024 | 0.034 |
|
| 136 | 33.09% | 1.331 | 1.176 | 0.112 | 0.171 |
|
| 22 | 5.35% | 1.054 | 1.036 | 0.021 | 0.031 |
|
| 15 | 3.65% | 1.037 | 1.026 | 0.015 | 0.021 |
|
| 113 | 27.49% | 1.275 | 1.166 | 0.1 | 0.15 |
|
| 34 | 8.27% | 1.083 | 1.058 | 0.033 | 0.048 |
|
| 1 | 0.24% | 1.002 | 1.002 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
|
| 18 | 4.38% | 1.044 | 1.03 | 0.017 | 0.025 |
|
| 40 | 9.73% | 1.097 | 1.069 | 0.039 | 0.057 |
Note: NPL, the number of polymorphic loci; PPL, the percentage of polymorphic loci; na, observed number of alleles; ne, effective number of alleles; h, Nei’s (1973) gene diversity; I, Shannon’s Information index.
Figure 3Cluster analysis of 18 species of the Melilotus genus based on 70 EST-SSR markers.
Figure 4Genetic structure of 54 individuals for 18 Melilotus species as inferred by STRUCTURE with the EST-SSR marker data set. Histogram of the STRUCTURE analysis for the model with K = 3 (showing the highest ΔK). The smallest vertical barre presents one individual. The assignment proportion of each individual into Cluster I, Cluster II and Cluster III is shown along the y-axis.
M. albus accessions used for EST-SSR molecular marker validation.
| Code | Accession number | Origin | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PI 662299 | Vienna, Austria | N 48°20′ | E 16°33′ |
| 2 | PI 553075 | Poland | N 51°48′ | E 19°06′ |
| 3 | PI 366038 | Buenos Aires, Argentina | S 34°35′ | W 58°26′ |
| 4 | PI 478773 | Florida, United States | N 27°39′ | W 81°30′ |
| 5 | PI 508617 | Santa Fe | S 32°5′ | E 1°29′ |
| 6 | PI 342796 | Hungary | N 47°05′ | E 19°36′ |
| 7 | PI 662296 | Saskatchewan, Canada | — | — |
| 8 | PI 478468 | Bolivia | — | — |
| 9 | PI 342765 | France | N 46°15′ | W 2°16′ |
| 10 | PI 494706 | Romania | N 44°12′ | E 28°36′ |
| 11 | ZXY06P-1732 | Russian Federation | N 62° | W 9° |
| 12 | Zhongxu-1226 | — | — | — |
| 13 | ZXY07P-3150 | — | — | — |
| 14 | ZXY05P-983 | Russian Federation | — | — |
| 15 | HB2009-153 | Xinyang, China | N 32°10′ | E 114°07′ |
Note: “—” indicates that the information is unknown.
Accessions of 18 Melilotus species used for analysis of primer transferability.
| Species | Accession number | Origin | Latitude | Longitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PI 342739 | England, United Kingdom | N 52°26′ | W 19°06′ |
| PI 593233 | Wisconsin, United States | N 43°40′ | W 88°33′ | |
|
| PI 275975 | France | N 48°38′ | W 4°18′ |
| PI 420163 | France | N 46°13′ | E 2°12′ | |
|
| PI 108656 | Armenia | N 40°4′ | E 45°2′ |
| PI 90753 | China | N 35°51′ | E 104°11′ | |
|
| PI 260271 | Ethiopia, Shewa | N 9°9′ | E 37°48′ |
|
| Ames 22882 | Russian Federation | — | — |
| PI 129697 | Sweden | N 60°7′ | E 18°38′ | |
|
| Ames 21619 | Nebraska, United States | N 41°29′ | W 99°54′ |
| PI 107562 | Uzbekistan | N 41°23′ | E 69°4′ | |
| PI 43595 | — | — | — | |
|
| PI 306326 | Algeria | N 27°13′ | E 2°29′ |
| PI 306327 | Italy | N 41°52′ | E12°34′ | |
| PI 306328 | Hungary | N 47°9′ | E 19°30′ | |
|
| PI 317635 | Czechoslovakia | N 14°28′ | E 121°2′ |
| PI 317638 | Israel | N 31°2′ | E 34°51′ | |
|
| PI 132270 | Romania | — | — |
| PI 342889 | Germany | — | — | |
| PI 342898 | France | — | — | |
|
| PI 314386 | Former Soviet Union | N 45°5′ | E 41°50′ |
|
| PI 317633 | Algeria | N 27°13′ | E 2°29′ |
| PI 317649 | Czechoslovakia | N 48°2′ | E 18°22′ | |
| PI 43597 | — | — | — | |
|
| PI 129703 | Malta | N 35°56′ | E 14°22′ |
| PI 318508 | Greece | N 39°4′ | E 21°49′ | |
| PI 33366 | Former Soviet Union | — | — | |
|
| PI 317650 | Manitoba, Canada | N 53°45′ | W 98°48′ |
|
| Ames 18402 | Nebraska, United States | N 41°29′ | W 99°54′ |
| Ames 25647 | Krym, Ukraine | N 44°24′ | E 33°49′ | |
| PI 317644 | Algeria | N 27°13′ | E 2°29′ | |
|
| PI 593408 | South Dakota, United States | N 43°58′ | W 99°54′ |
| PI 595395 | Iowa, United States | N 41°52′ | W 93°5′ | |
|
| PI 198090 | Morocco | N 31°47′ | W 7°5′ |
| PI 227595 | Tunisia | N 33°53′ | E 9°32′ | |
|
| Ames 18446 | Nebraska, United States | N 41°29′ | W 99°54′ |
| Ames 25789 | Krym, Ukraine | N 44°24′ | E 33°49′ | |
|
| PI 317665 | Denmark | N 56°15′ | E 9°30′ |
| PI 317666 | Czechoslovakia | N 48°2′ | E 18°22′ | |
| PI 502547 | Russian Federation | N 50°45′ | E 49°19′ |
Note: “—” indicated that the information is unknown.