| Literature DB >> 33198627 |
Yumei Jiang1,2, Sheng Xu1,2, Rong Wang1,2, Jiayu Zhou1,2, Jian Dou1, Qian Yin1, Ren Wang3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Lycoris genus includes many ornamentally and medicinally important species. Polyploidization and hybridization are considered modes of speciation in this genus, implying great genetic diversity. However, the lack of effective molecular markers has limited the genetic analysis of this genus.Entities:
Keywords: EST-SSR; Genetic analysis; Lycoris; Molecular markers; Polymorphism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33198627 PMCID: PMC7670666 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-020-02727-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Frequency of di- to hexa-nucleotide repeat motifs in L. aurea
| Types | Repeat Motifs | Numbers | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dinucleotide | AC/GT | 40 | 147 |
| AG/CT | 77 | ||
| AT/AT | 26 | ||
| CG/CG | 4 | ||
| Trinucleotide | AAC/GTT | 38 | 623 |
| AAG/CTT | 116 | ||
| AAT/ATT | 20 | ||
| ACC/GGT | 36 | ||
| ACG/CGT | 32 | ||
| ACT/AGT | 35 | ||
| AGC/GCT | 41 | ||
| AGG/CCT | 47 | ||
| ATC/GAT | 37 | ||
| ATG/CAT | 26 | ||
| CTG/CAG | 45 | ||
| CCG/CGG | 39 | ||
| TGT/ACA | 7 | ||
| TCT/AGA | 33 | ||
| TAT/ATA | 5 | ||
| GAG/CTC | 41 | ||
| GCG/CGC | 12 | ||
| GTG/CAC | 13 | ||
| Tetranucleotide | AAGA | 1 | 9 |
| TTTA/AAAT | 3 | ||
| ATCA | 1 | ||
| TTAT/AATA | 2 | ||
| ACAT | 1 | ||
| CATA | 1 | ||
| Pentanucleotide | AAGAA | 1 | 13 |
| ATTTT/AAAAT | 4 | ||
| AATTC | 1 | ||
| AAAAG/TTTTC | 2 | ||
| AAATA/TATTT | 3 | ||
| AGTGC | 1 | ||
| CCTCG | 1 | ||
| Hexanucleotide | ns | ns | 47 |
Note: ns not showed
Accuracy and authenticity of EST-SSRs confirmed by sequencing
| Markers | Repeats predicted | Repeats in | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaES3 | (GCA)5 | (GCA)5 | / | / | / | / |
| LaES6 | (CTT)7 | (CTT)7 | / | / | / | / |
| LaES12 | (GA)8 | (GA)6 | / | / | / | / |
| LaES13 | (CGC)6 | (CGC)6 | (CGC)4 | / | / | / |
| LaES18 | (GAA)5 | (GAA)4 | (GAA)5 | / | / | / |
| LaES20 | (GAA)5 | (GAA)8 | / | / | – | / |
| LaES22 | (AGG)4 | (AGG)5 | (AGG)3 | / | / | / |
| LaES25 | (TTCTT)4 | (TTCTT)3 | (TTCTT)3 | / | – | – |
| LaES26 | (TAT)5 | (TAT)5 | (TAT)5 | / | / | / |
| LaES27 | (TGG)5 | (TGG)5 | (TGG)4 | / | / | / |
| LaES29 | (AAGA)5 | (AAGA)5 | / | / | / | / |
| LaES31 | (CTC)5 | (CTC)7 | / | / | – | / |
| LaES34 | (GTT)5 | (GTT)5 | (GTT)4 | / | – | / |
| LaES36 | (CT)8 | (CT)7 | (CT)7 | (CT)6 | (CT)7 | (CT)8 |
| LaES41 | (GAG)6 | (GAG)5 | / | / | – | – |
| LaES46 | (AGTGC)4 | (AGTGC)4 | / | / | / | / |
| LaES49 | (TA)7 | (TA)7 | (TA)5 | / | – | – |
| LaES53 | (CAT)6 | (CAT)7 | (CAT)8 | (CAT)8 | (CAT)5 | (CAT)5 |
| LaES55 | (AGC)5 | (AGC)5 | / | / | – | – |
| LaES58 | (ACC)5 | (ACC)5 | / | / | – | / |
Note: ‘/’ indicated that products were not sequenced, and ‘-’ indicates no products or products with improper sizes
Cross-species amplification of the 60 microsatellite loci in Lycoris species
| Markers | Amplification | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in | in | in | in | in | |
| LaES1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES2 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES3 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES4 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES5 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES6 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES7 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES8 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES9 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES10 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES11 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES12 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES13 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES14 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES15 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES16 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES17 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES18 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES19 | + | – | – | – | – |
| LaES20 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES21 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES22 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES23 | – | – | – | + | + |
| LaES24 | – | – | – | – | + |
| LaES25 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES26 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES27 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES28 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES29 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES30 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES31 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES32 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES33 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES34 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES35 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES36 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES37 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES38 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES39 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES40 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES41 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES42 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES43 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES44 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES45 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES46 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES47 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES48 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES49 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES50 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES51 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES52 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES53 | + | + | + | + | + |
| LaES54 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES55 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES56 | + | – | – | + | + |
| LaES57 | – | – | – | – | – |
| LaES58 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES59 | + | – | + | + | + |
| LaES60 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Total | 44 | 23 | 30 | 44 | 45 |
Note: ‘+’ indicates that products with proper sizes, ‘-’ indicates no products or products with improper sizes
Fig. 1Alignment of amplicons of LaES36 and LaES53 in L. aurea, L. sprengeri, L. chinensis, L. anhuiensis and L. radiata. The repeat motifs are underlined. a, Alignment for LaES36. b, Alignment for LaES53
L. radiata lines used for genetic diversity analysis
| Population Code | Individual Numbers | Karotype | Ploidy | Characters | Places of Collection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pop1 | 3 | 2n = 33 | triploid | sterile | Jiuhua, Jurong, Jiangsu (119° 13′ E, 32° 07′ N) |
| Pop2 | 3 | 2n = 22 | diploid | sterile | Nanjing Botanical Garden Mem. Sun Yat-Sen (118° 83′ E, 32° 05′ N) |
| Pop3 | 4 | 2n = 22 | diploid | sterile | Nanjing Botanical Garden Mem. Sun Yat-Sen (118° 83′ E, 32° 05′ N) |
| Pop4 | 2 | 2n = 22 | diploid | fertile | Yixing,Wuxi, Jiangsu (119° 82′ E, 31° 34′ N) |
| Pop5 | 3 | 2n = 22 | diploid | fertile | Pengze, Jiujiang, Jiangxi (116° 56′ E, 29° 09′ N) |
| Pop6 | 4 | 2n = 22 | diploid | fertile | Suxian,Chenzhou,Hunan (113° 06′ E, 25° 55′ N) |
| Pop7 | 15 | 2n = 22 | diploid | offspring | Offspring of Pop6 (118° 83′ E, 32° 05′ N) |
Parameters of genetic diversity among 15 EST-SSR markers for 7 L. radiata lines
| Markers | Na | Ne | h | I | PIC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sequence verified | LaES13 | 16 | 11.549 | 0.275 | 0.428 | 0.817 |
| LaES18 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| LaES22 | 3 | 2.371 | 0.135 | 0.221 | 0.374 | |
| LaES25 | 20 | 13.195 | 0.209 | 0.339 | 0.765 | |
| LaES26 | 7 | 5.098 | 0.155 | 0.244 | 0.447 | |
| LaES27 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| LaES34 | 9 | 7.181 | 0.238 | 0.354 | 0.615 | |
| LaES36 | 22 | 16.280 | 0.299 | 0.462 | 0.850 | |
| LaES49 | 6 | 4.868 | 0.371 | 0.554 | 0.474 | |
| LaES53 | 16 | 11.374 | 0.236 | 0.357 | 0.742 | |
| Mean | 10.1 | 7.391 | 0.192 | 0.296 | 0.636 | |
| Sequence unverified | LaES03 | 12 | 8.181 | 0.254 | 0.415 | 0.708 |
| LaES20 | 18 | 13.527 | 0.300 | 0.455 | 0.828 | |
| LaES31 | 17 | 12.168 | 0.373 | 0.390 | 0.801 | |
| LaES46 | 7 | 4.812 | 0.153 | 0.262 | 0.603 | |
| LaES58 | 13 | 8.451 | 0.130 | 0.217 | 0.466 | |
| Mean | 13.4 | 9.428 | 0.242 | 0.348 | 0.681 | |
Na Observed number of alleles, Ne Effective number of alleles, h Nei’s (1973) gene diversity, I Shannon’s Information index, PIC Polymorphism information content
Parameters of genetic differentiation among 13 EST-SSR markers for 7 L. radiata lines
| Markers | Ht | Hs | Gst | Nm | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verified | LaES13 | 0.304 | 0.033 | 0.891 | 0.061 |
| LaES22 | 0.168 | 0.036 | 0.786 | 0.136 | |
| LaES25 | 0.202 | 0.054 | 0.733 | 0.182 | |
| LaES26 | 0.133 | 0.046 | 0.654 | 0.264 | |
| LaES34 | 0.248 | 0.055 | 0.778 | 0.142 | |
| LaES36 | 0.300 | 0.061 | 0.797 | 0.128 | |
| LaES49 | 0.432 | 0.060 | 0.861 | 0.081 | |
| LaES53 | 0.220 | 0.059 | 0.732 | 0.183 | |
| Mean | 0.200 | 0.040 | 0.779 | 0.147 | |
| Unverified | LaES03 | 0.262 | 0.078 | 0.702 | 0.212 |
| LaES20 | 0.325 | 0.052 | 0.840 | 0.095 | |
| LaES31 | 0.258 | 0.102 | 0.605 | 0.327 | |
| LaES46 | 0.200 | 0.058 | 0.710 | 0.204 | |
| LaES58 | 0.106 | 0.033 | 0.689 | 0.226 | |
| Mean | 0.230 | 0.065 | 0.709 | 0.213 | |
Ht Total genetic diversity, Hs Within population genetic diversity, Gst Genetic differentiation coefficient, Nm Gene flow)
Pairwise comparison of Nei’s genetic distance among populations
| Pop ID | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pop1 | Pop2 | Pop3 | Pop4 | Pop5 | Pop6 | Pop7 | |||
| | Pop1 | 0.3988 | |||||||
| Pop2 | 0.5364 | 0.2666 | |||||||
| Pop3 | 0.5316 | 0.2499 | 0.0064 | ||||||
| Pop4 | 0.5568 | 0.4424 | 0.4327 | 0.4105 | |||||
| Pop5 | 0.5125 | 0.3483 | 0.3401 | 0.3219 | 0.2246 | ||||
| Pop6 | 0.3352 | 0.2529 | 0.2631 | 0.2397 | 0.2362 | 0.1615 | |||
| Pop7 | 0.3121 | 0.2197 | 0.2284 | 0.2085 | 0.2034 | 0.1392 | 0.0304 | ||
Fig. 2UPGMA dendrogram constructed among 34 individuals from 7 L. radiata lines with L. aurea as an outgroup based on 15 SSR markers developed in this study
Fig. 3Structure analysis of L. radiata lines. a Plot of Delta K vs K values to define the most probable number of clusters in the analysis of population structure of 34 Lycoris radiata individuals; b Q values and ancestry assignment of Lycoris radiata individuals (Q > 0.70, K = 4). Admixed or intermediate were identified with an asterisk. The Arabic numerals represented individuals
Fig. 4UPGMA dendrogram of the 34 L. radiata individuals based on 15 SSR markers. Admixed or intermediate were identified with an asterisk. Color was set consistent with structure analysis. The Arabic numerals represented individuals