Literature DB >> 29263276

Sex and genotype effects on nutrient-dependent fitness landscapes in Drosophila melanogaster.

M Florencia Camus1, Kevin Fowler2, Matthew W D Piper3, Max Reuter2.   

Abstract

The sexes perform different reproductive roles and have evolved sometimes strikingly different phenotypes. One focal point of adaptive divergence occurs in the context of diet and metabolism, and males and females of a range of species have been shown to require different nutrients to maximize their fitness. Biochemical analyses in Drosophila melanogaster have confirmed that dimorphism in dietary requirements is associated with molecular sex differences in metabolite titres. In addition, they also showed significant within-sex genetic variation in the metabolome. To date however, it is unknown whether this metabolic variation translates into differences in reproductive fitness. The answer to this question is crucial to establish whether genetic variation is selectively neutral or indicative of constraints on sex-specific physiological adaptation and optimization. Here we assay genetic variation in consumption and metabolic fitness effects by screening male and female fitness of thirty D. melanogaster genotypes across four protein-to-carbohydrate ratios. In addition to confirming sexual dimorphism in consumption and fitness, we find significant genetic variation in male and female dietary requirements. Importantly, these differences are not explained by feeding responses and probably reflect metabolic variation that, in turn, suggests the presence of genetic constraints on metabolic dimorphism.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  fitness; nutrition; reproduction; sexual dimorphism

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29263276      PMCID: PMC5745421          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  Sex-specific fitness consequences of nutrient intake and the evolvability of diet preferences.

Authors:  Adam J Reddiex; Thomas P Gosden; Russell Bonduriansky; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Fitness and its components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T Tanaka; T Yamazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Genet       Date:  1990-12

3.  MALE EFFECTS ON FECUNDITY IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Lawrence G Harshman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila.

Authors:  A K Chippindale; J R Gibson; W R Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantitative Genetics of Food Intake in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Megan E Garlapow; Wen Huang; Michael T Yarboro; Kara R Peterson; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Reproduction regulates Drosophila nutrient intake through independent effects of egg production and sex peptide: Implications for aging.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bowman; Marc Tatar
Journal:  Nutr Healthy Aging       Date:  2016-10-27

7.  Differential effects of male nutrient balance on pre- and post-copulatory traits, and consequences for female reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Juliano Morimoto; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Prevalent positive epistasis in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolic networks.

Authors:  Xionglei He; Wenfeng Qian; Zhi Wang; Ying Li; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-01-24       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 9.  Dietary restriction in Drosophila: delayed aging or experimental artefact?

Authors:  Matthew D W Piper; Linda Partridge
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Rapid evolution of the intersexual genetic correlation for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Julie M Collet; Sara Fuentes; Jack Hesketh; Mark S Hill; Paolo Innocenti; Edward H Morrow; Kevin Fowler; Max Reuter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  10 in total

1.  Nutritional geometry of mitochondrial genetic effects on male fertility.

Authors:  M F Camus; J Moore; M Reuter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Sex and genotype effects on nutrient-dependent fitness landscapes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Kevin Fowler; Matthew W D Piper; Max Reuter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Female-biased upregulation of insulin pathway activity mediates the sex difference in Drosophila body size plasticity.

Authors:  Jason W Millington; George P Brownrigg; Charlotte Chao; Ziwei Sun; Paige J Basner-Collins; Lianna W Wat; Bruno Hudry; Irene Miguel-Aliaga; Elizabeth J Rideout
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Sex-Specific Responses of Life Span and Fitness to Variation in Developmental Versus Adult Diets in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elizabeth M L Duxbury; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Sex-specific transcriptomic responses to changes in the nutritional environment.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Matthew Dw Piper; Max Reuter
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  How flies turn food into progeny.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Viral susceptibility across host species is largely independent of dietary protein to carbohydrate ratios.

Authors:  Katherine E Roberts; Ben Longdon
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.516

8.  Drosophila melanogaster as a Model Organism for Obesity and Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus by Applying High-Sugar and High-Fat Diets.

Authors:  Nieves Baenas; Anika E Wagner
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-02-14

9.  Complex community-wide consequences of consumer sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Stephen P De Lisle; Sebastian J Schrieber; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 5.606

10.  The relationship between longevity and diet is genotype dependent and sensitive to desiccation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Andrew W McCracken; Eleanor Buckle; Mirre J P Simons
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.312

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.