Literature DB >> 23778229

Sex-specific fitness consequences of nutrient intake and the evolvability of diet preferences.

Adam J Reddiex1, Thomas P Gosden, Russell Bonduriansky, Stephen F Chenoweth.   

Abstract

The acquisition of nutrients is fundamental for the maintenance of bodily functions, growth, and reproduction in animals. As a result, fitness can be maximized only when animals are able to direct their attention to foods that reflect their current nutritional needs. Despite significant literature documenting the fitness consequences of nutrient composition and preference, less is known about the underlying genetic architecture of the dietary preferences themselves, specifically, the degree to which they can respond to selection. We addressed this by integrating evolutionary quantitative genetics and nutritional geometry to examine the shape of the sex-specific fitness surfaces and the availability of genetic variance for macronutrient preferences in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Combining these analyses, we found that the microevolutionary potential of carbohydrate and protein preference was above average in this population, because the expected direction of selection was relatively well aligned with the major axis of the genetic variance-covariance matrix, G. We also found that potential exists for sexually antagonistic genetic constraint in this system; macronutrient blends maximizing fitness differed between the sexes, and cross-sex genetic correlations for their consumption were positive. However, both sexes were displaced from their feeding optima, generating similar directional selection on males and females, with the combined effect being that minimal sex-specific genetic constraints currently affect dietary preferences in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23778229     DOI: 10.1086/670649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  38 in total

1.  Dominance genetic variance for traits under directional selection in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Macronutrient intakes and the lifespan-fecundity trade-off: a geometric framework agent-based model.

Authors:  Cameron J Hosking; David Raubenheimer; Michael A Charleston; Stephen J Simpson; Alistair M Senior
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Heritable Micro-environmental Variance Covaries with Fitness in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Jacqueline L Sztepanacz; Katrina McGuigan; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Sexual conflict, life span, and aging.

Authors:  Margo I Adler; Russell Bonduriansky
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 10.005

5.  Genetic and Genomic Response to Selection for Food Consumption in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Megan E Garlapow; Logan J Everett; Shanshan Zhou; Alexander W Gearhart; Kairsten A Fay; Wen Huang; Tatiana V Morozova; Gunjan H Arya; Lavanya Turlapati; Genevieve St Armour; Yasmeen N Hussain; Sarah E McAdams; Sophia Fochler; Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Nutritional geometry of mitochondrial genetic effects on male fertility.

Authors:  M F Camus; J Moore; M Reuter
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Sex and genotype effects on nutrient-dependent fitness landscapes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  M Florencia Camus; Kevin Fowler; Matthew W D Piper; Max Reuter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Parental age influences developmental stability of the progeny in Drosophila.

Authors:  Betina Colines; Nahuel Cabrera Rodríguez; Esteban R Hasson; Valeria Carreira; Nicolás Frankel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Protein and carbohydrate intake influence sperm number and fertility in male cockroaches, but not sperm viability.

Authors:  Harriet Bunning; James Rapkin; Laurence Belcher; C Ruth Archer; Kim Jensen; John Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Genotype-by-sex-by-diet interactions for nutritional preference, dietary consumption, and lipid deposition in a field cricket.

Authors:  James Rapkin; Kim Jensen; Clarissa M House; Alastair J Wilson; John Hunt
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.