| Literature DB >> 29262808 |
Shivashankar Damodaran1, Nathan Damaschke1, Joseph Gawdzik1, Bing Yang1, Cedric Shi1, Glenn O Allen1, Wei Huang2, John Denu3,4,5, David Jarrard6,7,8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Histones undergo extensive post-translational modifications and this epigenetic regulation plays an important role in modulating transcriptional programs capable of driving cancer progression. Acetylation of histone H3K18, associated with gene activation, is enhanced by P300 and opposed by the deacetylase Sirtuin2 (SIRT2). As these enzymes represent an important target for cancer therapy, we sought to determine whether the underlying genes are altered during prostate cancer (PCa) progression.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer progression; Epigenetic modifications in PCa; Histone H3 acetylation; SIRT2 loss
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29262808 PMCID: PMC5738829 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3853-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinicopathological correlation with H3K18Ac, P300 and SIRT2 expression analyzed by immunohistochemistry
| Clinical | H3K18Ac | (p) | SIRT2 | (p) | P300 | (p) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extraprostatic Extension | No (46) | 0.371(0.316–0.434) | 0.0152(0.010–0.019) | 0.135(0.125–0.150) | |||
| Yes (24) | 0.375(0.308–0.414) | 0.71 | 0.0132(0.011–0.017) | 0.17 | 0.145(0.125–0.162) | 0.09 | |
| Seminal Vesicle Invasion | No (54) | 0.373(0.318–0.431) | 0.015(0.011–0.019) | 0.135(0.125–0.15) | |||
| Yes (17) | 0.365(0.306–0.414) | 0.41 | 0.011(0.010–0.016) | 0.12 | 0.146(0.128–0.165) |
| |
| Laterality | U/L (4) | 0.380(0.323–0.410) | 0.010(0.0085–0.013) | 0.125(0.118–0.136) | |||
| B/L (67) | 0.371(0.31–0.422) | 0.92 | 0.015(0.011–0.018) | 0.16 | 0.137(0.125–0.153) | 0.20 | |
| Margins | No (44) | 0.371(0.312–0.429) | 0.0157(0.011–0.019) | 0.139(0.126–0.158) | |||
| Yes (26) | 0.373(0.306–0.414) | 0.79 | 0.012(0.010–0.017) | 0.07 | 0.132(0.125–0.147) | 0.46 | |
| Clinical stage | II (42) | 0.371(0.316–0.439) | 0.015(0.010–0.019) | 0.134(0.125–0.150) | |||
| III (12) | 0.358(0.308–0.401) | 0.013(0.010–0.017) | 0.137(0.126–0.153) | ||||
| IV (16) | 0.396(0.311–0.414) | 0.64 | 0.016(0.010–0.018) | 0.58 | 0.146(0.126–0.163 | 0.13 | |
| PSA level (ng/ml) | 0–5 (6) | 0.343(0.296–0.456) | 0.011(0.009–0.015) | 0.136(0.124–0.146) | |||
| 5–10 (35) | 0.372(0.313–0.414) | 0.015(0.012–0.018) | 0.133(0.124–0.152) | ||||
| >10 (12) | 0.365(0.307–0.425) | 0.96 | 0.011(0.010–0.019) | 0.15 | 0.145(0.134–0.160) | 0.51 | |
| Gleason score | |||||||
| (3 + 3, 3 + 4) | Low/Int (35) | 0.371(0.321–0.441) | 0.015(0.012–0.019) | 0.128(0.121–0.142) | |||
|
| High (19) | 0.345(0.298–0.412) | 0.15 | 0.011(0.009–0.015) |
| 0.134(0.124–0.152) | 0.68 |
Relative staining intensity of H3K18Ac, SIRT2 and P300 (mean, standard deviation expressed in 0D units) compared to clinicopathological correlates
Fig. 1Concurrent immunostaining demonstrates H3K18Ac and P300 increase and SIRT2 decreases during prostate cancer progression. Mean nuclear staining intensity of H3K18Ac, P300 and SIRT2 compared between benign, primary and metastatic PCa. Immunohistochemistry was quantitated using VECTRA and inform software as described. a Nuclear levels of H3K18Ac, (b) p300 and (c) SIRT2 levels in benign, primary and metastatic PCa. (p < 0.05 indicated by * and <0.01 indicated by **). d. Staining patterns in representative benign (top) and malignant (bottom) tissues. In this triple stained image, H3K18Ac stains brown (Chromo DAB) and SIRT2 stains purple (Vector VIP), while E-cadherin used for compartmentalization stains black. (e). Increased H3K18Ac acetylation identifies patients at increased risk of PCa recurrence. Kaplan Meyer curves comparing PSA recurrence-free survival between high and low H3K18Ac staining. H3K18Ac staining on a per-core basis was measured using the Vectra platform in all tissues. Patients were stratified into high or low H3K18Ac levels based on median core expression. There was a statistically significant PSA-free survival advantage in the low H3K18Ac staining group. (1542 vs 350 days, p = 0.03)
Fig. 2a mRNA expression analysis from human genome data in Genome Expression Analysis (GEO) data repository showing differential expression of SIRT2 mRNA between benign and primary PCa (p < 0.01) and between benign and metastasis (p = 0.004). b SIRT2 copy number alterations from Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC), showing the median and interquartile range of mRNA expression for SIRT2 in prostate cancer. There were 30 patients with SIRT2 deletions in the TCGA data base, including both shallow (n = 27) and deep (n = 3), which were compared to the 452 patients with diploid SIRT2. The mRNA expression levels were greater in the diploid compared to the deletion group. (p value = 0.03). c EP300 m RNA (gene for P300) expression shows a negative correlation with the mRNA expression of SIRT2. (Courtesy – TCGA database)
SIRT2 deletion versus clinicopathological outcomes in the prostate cancer TCGA database (n = 499)
| SIRT2 Deleted ( | SIRT2 Diploid ( | P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (Median/IQR) | 64(61.75–66.75) | 61(56–66) | |
| TNM stage | |||
| T1 | 0 | 2(0.4%) | |
| T2 | 5(16.67%) | 164(40.2%) | |
| T3 | 22(73.34%) | 276(61.2%) | |
| T4 | 3(10%) | 9(2%) |
|
| N1 | 8(27%) | 79(17.4%) | 0.22 |
| M+ | 3 | ||
| Recurrence | |||
| Yes | 10(33.34%) | 81(17.9%) | |
| No | 15(50%) | 290(64%) |
|
| Bilateral | 29(96%) | 435(96%) | 1 |
| LNDa dissection | 29(96%) | 421(90%) | 0.7 |
| Nodes (Median/IQR) | 7(4–16) | 9(5–16) | |
| Positive margins | 16(53%) | 152(33.6%) |
|
| Complete remission | 9 (30%) | 164(33.6%) | 0.8 |
| Partial remission | 4 (13%) | 29(6.4%) | 0.14 |
| Biochemical relapse | 3 (20%) | 48(10.6%) | 0.13 |
aClinicopathological outcomes were compared between patients with diploid and deleted SIRT2. Patients with SIRT2 deletion had higher clinical ‘T’ stage, increased chance of recurrence and greater odds of positive surgical margins