Literature DB >> 29260130

Comparison of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag techniques: A prospective observational study.

Mehmet Aziret1, Süleyman Çetinkünar2, Hasan Erdem2, Şahin Kahramanca3, Hilmi Bozkurt2, Onur Dülgeroğlu3, Ali Cihat Yıldırım3, Oktay İrkörücü2, Emre Birzad Gölboyu4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the recent increase in the use of laparoscopic appendectomy procedures to treat acute appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy is not necessarily the best treatment modality. The aim of this study is to examine the value of laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag in terms of various parameters and in terms of reducing the costs related to laparoscopic appendectomy procedures.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy-two acute appendicitis patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy surgery were enrolled in the study and were evaluated prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: group 1 was treated with laparoscopic appendectomy using laparoscopic intracorpreal knotting and glove endobag (n=36) and group 2 was treated with open appendectomy (n=36). The two groups were statistically compared in terms of preoperative symptoms and signs, laboratory and imaging findings, operation time and technique, pain score, gas and stool outputs, duration of hospital stay, return to normal activity, and complications.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in relation to gender, age, body mass index, or pre-operation findings, which included loss of appetite, vomiting, time when pain started, displacement of pain, defense, rebound, imaging methods, and laboratory and pathology examinations (p>0.05). Moreover, there were no differences between the groups with respect to drain usage, hospital stay time, or complications (p>0.05). In contrast, a statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of operation time, pain scores, gas-stool outputs, and return to normal activity in the laparoscopic appendectomy group (p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic appendectomy can be performed in a facile, safe, and cost-effective manner with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag. By using these techniques, the use of expensive instruments can be avoided when performing laparoscopic appendectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute appendicitis; glove endobag; laparoscopic appendectomy; laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting

Year:  2017        PMID: 29260130      PMCID: PMC5731561          DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Surg        ISSN: 2564-6850


  21 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial with sequential design of laparoscopic versus conventional appendicectomy.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; S Larsen; E Trondsen; B Edwin; A E Faerden; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: where are we now?

Authors:  G Cipe; O Idiz; M Hasbahceci; S Bozkurt; H Kadioglu; H Coskun; O Karatepe; M Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug

3.  The management of patients with suspected early postoperative small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  J Pickleman; R M Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis.

Authors:  D R Flum; A Morris; T Koepsell; E P Dellinger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-10       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  The gastrointestinal tract after anaesthesia.

Authors:  A J Ogilvy; G Smith
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl       Date:  1995-05

6.  Hem-o-lok plastic clips in securing of the base of the appendix during laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Samir Delibegović; Ervin Matović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy.

Authors:  Goutaro Katsuno; Kunihiko Nagakari; Seiichiro Yoshikawa; Kazuyoshi Sugiyama; Masaki Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Authors:  Abdul Razak Shaikh; Ahmed Khan Sangrasi; Gulshan Ara Shaikh
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting technique in patients with complicated and noncomplicated acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nurettin Ay; Bulent Dinç; Vahhac Alp; Şafak Kaya; Utkan Sevük
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Laparoscopic appendectomy using a polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump.

Authors:  Andrés Hanssen; Sergio Plotnikov; Rinci Dubois
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  3 in total

1.  A systematic review on the cost evaluation of two different laparoscopic surgical techniques among 996 appendectomies from a single center.

Authors:  Noemi Zorzetti; Augusto Lauro; Samuele Vaccari; Alessandro Ussia; Manuela Brighi; Vito D'andrea; Maurizio Cervellera; Valeria Tonini
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-05-30

2.  Intraoperative hemorrhage and increased spleen volume are risk factors for conversion to open surgery in patients undergoing elective robotic and laparoscopic splenectomy.

Authors:  Mehmet Aziret; Bülent Koyun; Kerem Karaman; Cenk Sunu; Alper Karacan; Volkan Öter; Fehmi Çelebi; Metin Ercan; Erdal Birol Bostancı
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-03-18

3.  Laparoscopic appendectomy, stump closure and endoloops: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noemi Zorzetti; Augusto Lauro; Maria Irene Bellini; Samuele Vaccari; Barbara Dalla Via; Maurizio Cervellera; Roberto Cirocchi; Salvatore Sorrenti; Vito D'Andrea; Valeria Tonini
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-09-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.