Literature DB >> 25149616

Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: where are we now?

G Cipe, O Idiz, M Hasbahceci, S Bozkurt, H Kadioglu, H Coskun, O Karatepe, M Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although the advantages of laparoscopic procedures has been well studied over the last two decade, laparoscopic appendectomy could not to be a standard therapy due to some disadvantages such as longer operative time and higher cost.The objective of our study is to re-evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy with current data.
METHODS: Between January 2012 and July 2012, the data of the patients who had appendectomy were recorded prospectively. Patients' demographics, duration of procedure, length of hospital stay, need of analgesics, postoperative visual analogue scale scores and morbidity were assessed.
RESULTS: Of 241 patients, 120 (49.8%) underwent open and 121(50.2%) laparoscopic appendectomy. The operating time was similar for both groups (p=0.855). The visual analog scale scores of 1st (p=0.001), 6th (p=0.001) and 12th (p=0.028) hours were higher in open the appendectomy group. The total need of analgesics significantly was higher in open group (p=0.001).There was no statistical difference in terms of total morbidity rate between open and laparoscopic appendectomy groups (p=0.617).
CONCLUSION: Two operative techniques are similar in terms of length of hospital stay, operative time, and postoperative complications. Laparoscopic appendectomy reduces the need for analgesics and visual analog scale scores; therefore,it should be considered as the gold standard for surgical treatment of acute appendicitis. Celsius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25149616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)        ISSN: 1221-9118


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Liping Dai; Jian Shuai
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Laparoscopic vs mini-incision open appendectomy.

Authors:  Fatih Çiftçi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-10-27

3.  Comparison of open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy with laparoscopic intracorporeal knotting and glove endobag techniques: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Mehmet Aziret; Süleyman Çetinkünar; Hasan Erdem; Şahin Kahramanca; Hilmi Bozkurt; Onur Dülgeroğlu; Ali Cihat Yıldırım; Oktay İrkörücü; Emre Birzad Gölboyu
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2017-12-01

4.  Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery, conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Jian Feng; Naiqiang Cui; Zhenyu Wang; Jutao Duan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Nonclosure of the Peritoneum during Appendectomy May Cause Less Postoperative Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Authors:  Huseyin Kazim Bektasoglu; Mustafa Hasbahceci; Samet Yigman; Erkan Yardimci; Enver Kunduz; Fatma Umit Malya
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Wound Irrigation Using Wet Gauze May Reduce Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Abdullah Al-Sawat; Ji Yeon Mun; Sung Hoon Yoon; Chul Seung Lee
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis.

Authors:  Thomas Jaschinski; Christoph G Mosch; Michaela Eikermann; Edmund Am Neugebauer; Stefan Sauerland
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-28

8.  The immune impact of mimic endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy and appendectomy on rabbits of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Suqin Liu; Fenghua Pei; Xinhong Wang; Deliang Li; Lixia Zhao; Yanyan Song; Zhendong Chen; Bingrong Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-03-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.