| Literature DB >> 29259472 |
Kenji Yamatoya1,2, Kazuki Saito1,3, Takakazu Saito1, Woojin Kang1,2, Akihiro Nakamura4, Mami Miyado3, Natsuko Kawano2,4, Yoshitaka Miyamoto2, Akihiro Umezawa2, Kenji Miyado2, Hidekazu Saito1.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the use of frozen embryos on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART), a retrospective study of the Japanese Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry data during the years 2007-2012 was conducted.Entities:
Keywords: Down syndrome; assisted reproductive technology; birthweight; chromosomal abnormalities; frozen‐thawed embryo transfer
Year: 2017 PMID: 29259472 PMCID: PMC5661821 DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Med Biol ISSN: 1445-5781
Figure 1Trends in the neonatal birthweights following term gestation. The patient outcomes and treatment data were extracted from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology database during the period from 2007 to 2012. The data are expressed as the mean values
Figure 2Comparisons of the number of neonates and birthweights in 2011 and 2012. A, Changes in the number of neonates from 2011 to 2012. B, The birthweights of the neonates in 2011 and 2012. The P‐values between the fresh and the frozen‐thawed groups were <.0001. C, The birthweights of the neonates in the half‐years of 2012. The P‐value between the January‐June and July‐December fresh groups was 0.66. The P‐value between the January‐June and July‐December frozen‐thawed groups was 0.79. For each group, the line in the middle of the box represents the median. The lower and the upper edges of the box are the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively. The lower and the upper whiskers represent the 10th and 90th percentile, respectively
Figure 3Frequency of Down syndrome in the neonates from the frozen‐thawed, compared to the fresh embryo transfer, cycles. A, The number of neonates with Down syndrome. The data were retrieved from the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) database in 2012. B, The distribution in maternal age of the patients who underwent the frozen‐thawed, compared to the fresh embryo transfer, cycles in 2012. C, The number of neonates with Down syndrome. The data were retrieved from the JSOG database during the period from 2007 to 2012. D, The distribution in the maternal age of the patients who underwent the frozen‐thawed, compared to the fresh embryo transfer, cycles during the period from 2007 to 2012
Frequencies of chromosomal abnormalities. Chromosomal abnormalities in 2012. and chromosomal abnormalities during the period from 2007 to 2012
| Chromosomal abnormality | Chromosomal abnormalities in 2012 (%) | Chromosomal abnormalities from 2007‐2012 (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh (n=8230) | Frozen‐thawed (n=21 543) | OR | 95% CI |
| Fresh (n=44 286) | Frozen‐thawed (n=80 660) | OR | 95% CI |
| |
| Beckwith–Wiedemann syndrome | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.01) | – | – | – | 0 (0.00) | 4 (0.00) | – | – | – |
| Prader–Willi syndrome | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | – | – | – | 1 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | 0.55 | 0.6–5.26 | 1.00 |
| 5p‐ | 1 (0.01) | 0 (0.00) | – | – | – | 1 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | – | – | – |
| Trisomy 13 | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | – | – | – | 0 (0.00) | 2 (0.00) | – | – | – |
| Trisomy 18 | 0 (0.00) | 3 (0.00) | – | – | – | 3 (0.01) | 9 (0.01) | 1.65 | 0.48–5.36 | .56 |
| Trisomy 21 | 16 (0.19) | 32 (0.15) | 0.76 | 0.42–1.38 | .42 | 77 (0.17) | 101 (0.13) | 0.72 | 0.54–0.97 | .03 |
| XYY | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | – | – | – | 1 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | 0.55 | 0.06–5.26 | 1.00 |
| XXY | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | – | – | – | 1 (0.00) | 5 (0.01) | 2.75 | 0.43–17.72 | .43 |
| xxx | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | – | – | – | 1 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | – | – | – |
| Others (deletions, insertions, inversions, translocations) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.00) | – | – | – | 4 (0.01) | 8 (0.01) | 1.10 | 0.35–3.43 | 1.00 |
| Total | 17 (0.21) | 41 (0.19) | 0.92 | 0.53–1.61 | .77 | 89 (0.20) | 131 (0.16) | 0.81 | 0.62–1.06 | .12 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.